Environmental aesthetics at the turn of the centuries — a choice of the conceptual way

Authors

  • Вадим Викторович Прозерский St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

Abstract

The article deals with the basic positions and directions established in Russian and foreign environmental aesthetics in the late XX — early XXI century. In countries where environmental aesthetics is most fully developed, namely the U. S. and Finland, there are two directions: cognitivist and noncognitivist. We can find also intermediate positions, but most researchers, even those who claim their independence, yet tend to incline to one or the other of these poles. The first area focuses on rational factors in the aesthetic perception of nature, and the second — on the emotional. Each of these areas has its own advantages and disadvantages, as described in the article. The author draws attention to the fact that environmental aesthetics is multicultural and interdisciplinary science.

Keywords:

aesthetics, ecology, engagement, distance, environment, everyday life, aesthetic appreciation, culture, synesthesia, communication

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература / References

Эстетика природы / под ред. К. М. Долгова. М.: ИФ РАН 1994. 230 с.

Щедрина Г. К. Экологическая эстетика и универсализация эстетического // Эстетика в интерпарадигмальном пространстве: перспективы нового века. СПб.: Санкт-Петербургское философское общество 2001. С. 82–85.

Акиндинова Т. А. Об историко-культурных истоках эстетики повседневности // Эстетика в интерпарадигмальном пространстве: перспективы нового века. СПб.: Санкт-Петербургское философское общество 2001. С. 8–10.

Марков Б. В. Храм и рынок. СПб.: Алетейя 1999. 304 с.

Марков Б. В. Культура повседневности. СПб.: Питер 2008. 352 с.

Марков Б. В. Люди и знаки. СПб.: Наука 2011. 667 с.

Лелеко В. Д. Эстетика повседневности. СПб.: Санкт-Петербургская академия культуры 1994. 145 с.

Лелеко В. Д. Пространство повседневности в европейской культуре. СПб.: Санкт-Петербургский университет культуры и искусств 2002. 320 с.

Махлина С. Т. Язык искусства в контексте культуры. СПб.: Санкт-Петербургская академия культуры 1995. 218 c.

Махлина С. Т. Семиотика культуры повседневности. СПб.: Алетейя 2009. 232 с.

Махлина С. Т. Повседневность в зеркале жилого интерьера. СПб.: Алетейя 2012. 256 с.

Carlson A. Environmental Aesthetics // Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/M047 (дата обращения: 08.11.2012).

Hepburn R. W. Contemporary Aesthetics and the Neglect of Natural Beauty // British Analytical Philosophy / B. Williams A. Montefiore (ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1966. P. 328–342.

Carlson A. The Aesthetics of Environment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press 1999. 268 p.

Matthews P. Scientifi c Knowledge and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature // Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 2002. Vol. 60 No. 1. P. 37–48.

Parsons G. Nature Appreciation Science and Positive Aesthetics // British Journal of Aesthetics. 2002. Vol. 42 No. 3. P. 279–295.

Rolston H. Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia: Temple University Press 1988. 530 p.

Saito Y. The Japanese Appreciation of Nature // British Journal of Aesthetics. 1985. Vol. 25 No. 3. P. 239–251.

Berleant A. Art and Engagement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press 1992. 292 p.

Berleant A. Living in the Landscape: Toward an Aesthetics of Environment. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas 1997. 176 p.

Berleant A. Sensibility and Sense: The Aesthetic Transformation of the Human World. Exeter: Imprint Academiс 2010. 230 p.

Sepanmaa Y. Face to Face with the Landscape. URL: http://www.eki.ee/km/place/pdf/KP1_02sepanmaa.pdf(дата обращения: 18.11.2012).

Haapala A. (ed.). Aesthetics in the Human Environment. Lahti: International Institute of Applied Aesthetics1999. 308 p.28

Brady E. Imagination and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature // Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.1998. Vol. 56 Iss. 2. P. 139–147.

Brady E. Aesthetics of the Natural Environment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2003. 175 p.

Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Aesthetics Lahti 1995. Vol. II: Practical Aesthetics inPractice and Th eory / ed. by Martti Honkanen. Helsinki: University of Helsinki 1997. 142 p.

Saito Y. Everyday Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007. 275 p.

Leddy T. Defending Everyday Aesthetics and the Concept of ‘Pretty’ // Contemporary Aesthetics. 2012. Aug.

Published

2018-12-11

How to Cite

Прозерский, В. В. (2018). Environmental aesthetics at the turn of the centuries — a choice of the conceptual way. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 29(3), 22–28. Retrieved from https://philosophyjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/3228