Демаркация очевидности и конструкции как основание ответа на вопрос о бытии и истине в философии

Илья Игоревич Докучаев

doi:10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.305

Authors

Илья Игоревич Докучаев The Far Eastern Federal University; 8, Sukhanova Str., Vladivostok, 690950, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.305

Abstract

The paper attempts to reveal and identify a prerequisite for answering the two fundamental questions of philosophy: that of being and that of truth. This precondition is viewed as a problem of demarcation between evidence and construct, which is achieved in the process of doubting the being of an existent or in intuitive experiencing the former. This brings about evident (truthful) statements about this being and this existent, on the basis of which there are constructed (hypostatized) other forms of the existent. Despite the fact that construct and evidence cannot be separated and do form a specific antinomy in themselves, there is a way of building a scale for founding the distinction modification, whose ends shall be occupied by ideal types, while the centre is given to the actual status quo. This status quo is represented by four synthetic types of being. Our understanding of being as a relation between the subject and the object, each and every agent of which can be experienced with enough evidence and be constructed at the same time, leads us to shaping a regional ontology that encompasses both subjective forms (evidence of man and a construct of the society) and objective forms (evidence of nature and a construct of the culture) of being. Directness and certainty are the two key properties of evidence, whereas a breakup with them is the characteristic of a construct whose goal it is to achieve practical solution of theoretical problems. Constructs are the essential historical forms of culture such as reflection on being in the form of values, theories and imagery; and also its transformation in the course of practical activity. A special place in this praxis is given to a synthesis of reflection and transformation; i.e. performance that claims to be able to create a simulated being that is more real than reality. Human history is the story of how we rejected evidence in favour of constructs. This rejection, however, is at the same time rejection of genuine human properties in favour of ephemeral ones. The goal of modern philosophy is interpreted as that of freeing or clearing evidence from construct. Refs 12.

Keywords:

being, truth, evidence, construct, existent, existence, man, society, culture, nature, experience

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Фейерабенд П. Против методологического принуждения // Фейерабенд П. Избранные труды по методологии науки. М.: Прогресс, 1986. С. 125–467.

Аристотель. Метафизика // Аристотель. Соч.: в 4 т. М.: Мысль, 1976. Т. 1. С. 63–368.

Парменид // Фрагменты ранних греческих философов. М.: Наука, 1989. Ч. 1. С. 286–298.

Фома Аквинский. О сущем и сущности // Историко-философский ежегодник’88. М.: Наука, 1988. С. 230–252.

Декарт Р. Размышления о первой философии. // Декарт Р. Соч.: в 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1994. Т. 2. С. 3–72.

Тарский А. Семантическая концепция истины и основания семантики // Аналитическая философия: становление и развитие (антология). М.: Дом интеллектуальной книги, Прогресс-Традиция, 1998. С. 90–129.

Шопенгауэр А. Мир как воля и представление. М.: Московский Клуб, 1992. 395 с.

Гуссерль Э. Картезианские размышления. СПб.: Наука, 1998. 315 с.

Каган М. С. Метаморфозы бытия и небытия: Онтология в системно-синергетическом осмыслении. СПб.: Логос, 2006. 414 с.

Хайдеггер М. Бытие и время. М.: Ad Marginem, 1997. 451 с.

Чалмерс Д. Сознающий ум: В поисках фундаментальной теории. M.: URSS, 2015. 512 с.

Латур Б. Нового времени не было. СПб.: Европейский университет в С.-Петербурге, 2006. 296 с.

References

Feyerabend P. Protiv metodologicheskogo prinuzhdeniia [Against Method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge]. Feyerabend P. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki [Selected works on the methodology of science]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986, pp. 125–467. (In Russian)

Aristotle. Metafizika [Metaphysics]. Aristotle. Sochineniia [Works], in 4 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow, Mysl’, 1976, pp. 63–368. (In Russian)

Parmenid [Parmenides]. Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov [Fragments of the early Greek philosophers]. Part 1. Moscow, Nauka, 1989, pp. 286–298. (In Russian)

Thomas Aquinas. O sushchem i sushchnosti [On Being and Essence]. Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik’88 [Yearbook of History of Philosophy — 88]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988, pp. 230–252. (In Russian)

Descartes R. Razmyshleniia o pervoi filosofii [Meditations on First Philosophy]. Descartes R. Sochineniia [Works], in 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow, Mysl’, 1994, pp. 3–72. (In Russian)

Tarski A. Semanticheskaia kontseptsiia istiny i osnovaniia semantiki [The Semantical Concept of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics]. Analiticheskaia filosofiia: stanovlenie i razvitie [Analytical philosophy: the establishment and development]. Anthology. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1998, pp. 90–129. (In Russian)

Schopenhauer A. Mir kak volia i predstavlenie [The World as Will and Representation]. Moscow, Moskovskii Klub Publ., 1992. 395 p.

Husserl E. Kartezianskie razmyshleniia [Cartesian Meditations]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 1998. 315 p. (In Russian)

Kagan M. S. Metamorfozy bytiia i nebytiia: Ontologiia v sistemno-sinergeticheskom osmyslenii [Metamorphosis of being and nothingness: Ontology in system-synergetic understanding]. St. Petersburg, Logos Publ., 2006. 414 p. (In Russian)

Heidegger M. Bytie i vremia [Being and Time]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 1997. 451 p. (In Russian)

Chalmers D. Soznaiushchii um: V poiskakh fundamental’noi teorii [The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory]. Moscow, URSS Press, 2015. 512 p. (In Russian)

Latour B. Novogo vremeni ne bylo [We have never been modern]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg European University Press, 2006. 296 p. (In Russian)