World in Deleuze’s reconstruction of the ontology of univocity

Authors

  • Jing An Nankai University, 38, Tongyan Road, Tianjin, 300350, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.103

Abstract

Overcoming the tradition of metaphysics’ forgetting of the world and restoring the principal status of the world is the fundamental assertion of the movement of 20th century’s philosophical cosmology, and the ontology of univocity which is the centrepiece of Deleuze’s metaphysics of difference can be considered precisely as an important moment of this movement. Following the footsteps of Karl Löwith and Eugen Fink both of whom strive to surpass the traditional metaphysics in its medieval theological and modern subjectivist figures and think the World-Nature in a non-metaphysical manner, Deleuze has been well aware of the significance of Heraclitean original intuition of the world for the construction of ontology, that is to say, the ontology worthy of the name should be founded upon the World, be it cosmic or chaosmic, which is of a non-numerical unicity and of which both the divine and the human are only the modalities. Furthermore, he deepens this intuition through a reworking of Spinozism, especially the Spinozean theory of attributes as doubly infinite univocal forms and ultimately poses the Heraclito-Spinozean Nature-World as the common ontological condition of both the infinite and the finite and as the principle of individuation of all the intraworldy spatiotemporal beings. Hereby under the influence of the two German philosophers and through a deepening of their Heracliticism, Deleuze has established his own theory of World-Nature, i.e. ontology of univocity which has found its clearest and most profound expression in his creative interpretation of Spinoza’s theory of attributes.

Keywords:

world, cosmology, univocity, K. Löwith, E. Fink, J. Deleuze, Heraclitus, B. Spinoza

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References/ Литература

Villani, A. (1999), La guepe et l’orchidee [The Wasp and the Orchid], Berlin, Paris, France.

Bryant, L. (2008), Difference and Givenness: Deleuze’s Transcendental Empiricism and the Ontology of Immanence, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, USA.

Patočka, J. (2016), The Natural World as a Philosophical Problem, transl. by E. Abrams, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, USA.

Montebello, P. (2003), L’autre metaphysique. Essai sur Ravaisson, Tarde, Nietzsche et Bergson [The Other Metaphysics: On Ravaisson, Tarde, Nietzsche and Bergson], Desclee de Brouwer, Paris, France.

Montebello, P. (2007), Nature et subjectivite [Nature and Subjectivity], Jerome Millon, Grenoble, France.

Montebello, P. (2016), Metaphysiques cosmomorphes. La fin du monde humain [Cosmomorphic Metaphysics: End of the Human World], Les presses du reel, Paris, France.

Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987), A Thousand Plateaus, transl. by Massumi, B., University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Deleuze, G. (1988), Foucault, transl. by Hand, S., University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Deleuze, G. (1995), Negotiations 1972–1990, transl. Joughin, M., Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.

Lowith, K. (1981), “Welt und Menschenwelt” [World and Man’s World], in Mensch und Menschenwelt: Beitrage zur Anthropologie [Man and Man’s World: Contributions to Anthropology], Metzler, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 295–328.

Schnell, A. (2005), De l’existence ouverte au monde fini. Heidegger 1925–1930 [From the Opened Existence to the Finite World: Heidegger 1925–1930], Vrin, Paris, France.

Kahn, Ch. H. (1979), The Art and Thought of Heraclitus, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Lowith, K. (1968), Der Weltbegriff der neuzeitlichen Philosophie [The Concept of World of Modern Philosophy], Carl Winter Universitatsverlag, Heidelberg, Germany.

Fink, E. (2016), Play as Symbol of the World and Other Writings, transl. by Moore, I. A. and Turner, Ch., Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Fink, E. (1990), Welt und Endlichkeit [World and Finitude], Konigshausen und Neumann, Wurzburg, Germany.

Deleuze, G. (2003), Desert Islands and Other Texts (1953–1974), transl. by Taormina, M., Semiotexte, New York, NY, USA.

Takeuchi, D. (2011), “Zweideutigkeit des Meon und Kosmologie als Phanomenologie der Immanenz. Fink und Deleuze” [Ambiguity of Non-Being and Cosmology as Phenomenology of Immanence: Fink and Deleuze], in Nielsen, C. and Sepp, H. R., eds, Welt denken. Annaherungen an die Kosmologie Eugen Finks [Thinking the World: Approaches to the Cosmology of Eugen Fink], Verlag Karl Alber, Freiburg, Munchen, Germany, pp. 237–249.

Deleuze, G. (1994), Difference and Repetition, transl. by Patton, P., Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.

Deleuze, G. (1990), The Logic of Sense, transl. Lester, M. with Stivale, Ch., Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.

Deleuze, G. (1990), Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, transl. by Joughin, M., Zone Books, New York, NY, USA.

Lowith, K. (1967), Gott, Mensch und Welt in der Metaphysik von Descartes bis zu Nietzsche [God, Man and World in the Metaphysics from Descartes to Nietzsche], Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Gottingen, Germany.

Scotus, D. (1056), Opera Omnia Joannis Duns Scoti [Complete Works of John Duns Scotus], ed. By Balić, P. C., Civitas Vaticana, Rome, Italy.

Aquinas, Th. (1888), Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera Omnia [Complete Works of St. Thomas Aquinas], issu Leonis XIII edita cura, Typographia polyglottap, Rome, Italy.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-27

How to Cite

An, J. (2019). World in Deleuze’s reconstruction of the ontology of univocity. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 35(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.103

Issue

Vol. 35 No. 1 (2019): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.