Биология, среда и культура: от коммуникации животных к человеческому языку и познанию

Авторы

  • Татьяна Владимировна Черниговская  Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет, Российская Федерация, 199034, Санкт-Петербург, Университетская наб., 7–9

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.113

Аннотация

Противоречия в интерпретации данных различных наук, занимающихся антропогенезом и происхождением языка, невозможно преодолеть без комплексного междисциплинарного подхода. Важной задачей такой конвергенции является обеспечение комплементарности теоретических взглядов на проблему, что может быть достигнуто только при наличии общего языка ее описания. Человеческий язык — видоспецифичная способность мозга, дающая возможность не только выстраивать сложные коммуникационные сигналы, но и обеспечивать мышление. Язык характеризуется системой базисных универсальных правил, обусловленных, по всей видимости, свойствами самого мозга, с иерархически организованными уровнями — лексикон, грамматика (морфология, синтаксис, семантика и фонология) и прагматика. Многозначность — свойство любого сложного информационного потока, независимо от модальностей восприятия — особенно ярко проявляется в языке. Именно благодаря произвольности и многозначности человеческий язык является не только средством коммуникации, но и важным инструментом познания. Механизмы, обеспечивающие язык и другие высшие функции, рассматриваются в рамках то локализиционистской, то холистической моделей. Парадигмы продолжают сосуществовать или чередоваться, и основные дискуссии происходят между сторонниками идеи модульной языковой способности человека, базирующейся на лежащей в основе всех языков врожденной универсальной грамматике, и приверженцами коннекционистской модели, согласно которой основой развития языка является обучение нейронной сети, что сближает взгляд на язык с подходами к изучению иных видов коммуникаций. Эволюция привела к обретению мозгом способности к вычислению, использованию рекурсивных правил и ментальных репрезентаций, создав основу для мышления и языка в человеческом смысле. Мы сталкиваемся с оппозицией школ, сводимой к схеме детерминизм/врожденность языка против модели научения на основе частотностей, прогноза и предсказуемости. Статья разбирает свойства когнитивных процессов, характерных для человека, и их возможные предпосылки на примере других биологических видов. 

Ключевые слова:

эволюция языка и сознания, системы коммуникации у животных, происхождение и эволюция человека, обработка информации в условиях неопределенности

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки

References

1. Chomsky, N. (2002), New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

2. Bickerton, D. (2003), “Symbol and structure: a comprehensive framework for language evolution”, Christiansen, H. and Kirby, S. (eds), Language Evolution: the States of the Art, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 77–93.

3. Bickerton, D. (2007), Language evolution: A brief guide for linguists, Lingua, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 510–526.

4. Arbib, M. A. (2005), From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics, Behavioral and brain sciences, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 105–124.

5. Givón, T. (2009), The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 366 p.

6. Chernigovskaya, T., (2007), “Language Origins and Theory of Mind. Combat pour les Langues du Monde”, in Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest, M. M. (ed.), Fighting for the World’s Languages. Hommage a Claude Hagege, Editions L’Harmattan, Collection Grammaire & Cognition, Paris, pp. 105–114.

7. Chernigovskaya, T. (2009), From Communication Signals to Human Language and Thought: Evolution or Revolution?, Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 785–792.

8. Chernigovskaya, T. V. (2008), “What makes us human: why are there always recursive rules? (from the point of view of a linguist and biologist)”, in Koshelev, A. D. and Chernigovskaya, T. V. (eds), Reasonable behavior and language. Communicative systems of animals and humans. The problem of the origin of the language, Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury Publ., Moscow, pp. 395–412. (In Russian)

9. Chernigovskaya, T. V. (2010), If the mirror looks in the mirror, what will it see there (on the issue of the evolution of language and consciousness), Cognitive studies, no. 4, pp. 67–89. (In Russian)

10. Chernigovskaya, T. V. (2010), Brain and language: congenital modules or learning network? Vestnik RAN, vol. 80, no. 5–6, pp. 461–465.

11. Chernigovskaya, T. V. (2014), Before the experience acquired features… The human brain and the language that generated it, Logos, no. 1, pp. 79–96.

12. Chernigovskaya, T. V. (2015), “An Experimental Study of Language and Thinking in the 21 st Century: Traditions and Opportunities”, in Alferov, Zh. I. (ed.), Promising areas for the development of science in St. Petersburg, SPbNC RAN Publ., St. Petersburg, pp. 489–494. (In Russian)

13. Chernigovskaya, T. V. (2015), “Fuete, phoneme, formula, photon: languages of the brain and culture”, in Tishkov, V. A. (ed.), Trudy otdeleniia istoriko-filologicheskikh nauk RAN, Nauka Publ., Moscow, pp. 177–187. (In Russian)

14. Kozincev, A. G. (2013), “Origin and early history of the species HOMO SAPIENS: new biological data”, in Molodin, V. V. and Shun’kov, M. V. (eds), Fundamental’nye problemy arkheologii, antropologii, etnografii Evrazii (k 70-letiiu akad. A. P. Derevianko), IAE SO RAN Publ., Novosibirsk, pp. 538–554. (In Russian)

15. Berwick, R. C., Okanoya, K., Beckers, G. J. and Bolhuis, J. J. (2011), Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong, Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 113–121.

16. Berwick, R. C., Friederici, A. D., Chomsky, N. and Bolhuis J. J. (2013), Evolution, brain, and the nature of language, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 89–98.

17. Bolhius, J. J. and Everaert, M. (2013), Birdsong, Speech, and Language. Exploring the Evolution of Mind and Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 560 p.

18. Fitch, W. T. (2012), Evolutionary developmental biology and human language evolution: constraints on adaptation, Evolutionary biology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 613–637.

19. Fitch, W. T. (2017), Empirical approaches to the study of language evolution, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3–33.

20. Hauser, M., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. T. (2002), The language faculty: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, vol. 29, no. 5598, pp. 1569–1579.

21. Jackendoff, R. (2002), Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution, Oxford University Press, New York, 477 p.

22. Levinson, S. C. (2016), Turn-taking in human communication — origins and implications for language processing, Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 6–14.

23. Coupé, C., Oh, Y. M., Dediu, D. and Pellegrino, F. (2019), Different languages, similar encoding efficiency: Comparable information rates across the human communicative niche, Science Advances, vol. 5, no. 9, eaaw2594.

24. Evans N., Levinson, S. C. (2009), The myth of language universals: Language diversity and itsimportance for cognitive science, Behavioral and brain sciences, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 429–448.

25. Chernigovskaya, T. V. (1976), Dependence of perception of low-frequency amplitude modulation on age and training, Zhurnal evoliutsionnoi biokhimii i fiziologii, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 387–389.

26. Chernigovskaya, Т. (1977), Dependence of the perception of low-frequency amplitude modulation on age and training in man, Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, no. 4, pp. 341–343.

27. Assaneo, M. F. and Poeppel, D. (2018), The coupling between auditory and motor cortices is rate restricted: Evidence for an intrinsic speech-motor rhythm, Science advances, vol. 4, no. 2, eaao3842.

28. Chernigovskaya, T. V. (2013), Cheshire smile of Schrödinger cat: language and consciousness, Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury Publ., Moscow, 448 p.(In Russian)

29. Chernigovskaya, T. V., Alekseeva, S. V., Dubasova, A. V., Petrova, T. E., Prokopenja, V. K. and Chernova, D. A. (2018), Schrödinger cat’s view: recording eye movements in psycholinguistic research, St. Petersburg State University Press, St. Petersburg, 228 p. (In Russian)

30. Linnae, C. (1766–1768), Systema Naturae, Stockholm.

31. Vogt, K. (1867), Mikrocephalenoder Affen-Menschen, Braunschweig.

32. Häckel, E. (1899), Die Welträthsel. Gemeinvertstandliche Studienüber Monistische Philisophie, Strauss, Bonn, VIII, 473 p.

33. Fodor, J. (2001), The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology, MIT Press, Cambridge, 144 p.

34. Fodor, J. (2007), Why pigs don’t have wings, London Review of Books, vol. 29, no. 20, pp. 19–22.

35. Gardenfors, P. (2003), How Homo Became Sapiens: on the Evolution of Thinking, Oxford University Press, New York, 256 p.

36. Pagel, M., Venditti, C. and Meade, A. (2006), Large punctuational contribution of speciation to evolutionary divergence at the molecular level, Science, vol. 314, no. 5796, pp. 119–121.

37. Shmal’gauzen, I. I. (1939), Ways and patterns of the evolutionary process, AN SSSR, 232 p. (In Russian)

38. Deacon, T. (2013), Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter, W. W. Norton & Co. Ltd., New York, 627 p.

39. Pollard, K. S., Salama, S. R., Lambert, N., Lambot, M. A., Coppens, S., Pedersen, J. S., Katzman, S., King, B., Onodera, C., Siepel, A., Kern, A. D., Dehay, C., Igel, H., Ares, M., Vanderhaeghen, P. and Haussler, D.(2006), An RNA gene expressed during cortical development evolved rapidly in humans, Nature, vol. 443, no. 7108, pp. 149–150.

40. Kozincev, A. G. (2009), The evolutionary history of the species Homo sapiens in the light of new data from population genetics, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 23 (Antropologiia), no. 4, pp. 64–70.

41. Kozincev, A. G. (2013), Zoosemiotics and glottogenesis, Antropologicheskiiforum, no. 19, pp. 326–359.

42. Bunak, V. V. (1980), The genus Homo, its origin and subsequent evolution, Nauka Publ., Moscow, 329 p. (In Russian)

43. Dolukhanov, P. M. (2007), “Archeology, radiocarbon and resettlement of Homo sapiens in northern Eurasia”, in Zaitseva, G. I. and Kul’kova, M. A. (eds), Radiouglerod v arkheologicheskikh I paleoekologicheskikh issledovaniiakh, Teza Publ., St. Petersburg, pp. 135–154. (In Russian)

44. Barulin, A. N. (2007), Towards the theory of glottogenesis, Kochergina, V. A. (ed.) Linguistic comparative studies in cultural and historical aspects: Proceedings of the V International Conference on comparative historical linguistics, Moscow University Press, Moscow, pp. 9–44. (In Russian)

45. MacWhinney, B. (2002), The gradual emergence of language,Givón, T. and Malle, B. F. (eds), The evolution of language out of prelanguage, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp. 231–263.

46. Natochin, Ju. V., Menshutkin, V. V. and Chernigovskaya, T. V. (1992), General features of evolution in homeostatic and information systems, Zhurnal evoliutsionnoi biokhimii I fiziologii, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 623–637.

47. Chernigovskaya, T., Natochin, Yu. and Menshutkin, V. (2000), Principles of evolution of natural and computer languages and of physiological systems, Bichakjian, B., Chernigovskaya, T., Kendon, A. and Moeller, A. (eds), Becoming Loquens — Bochum Publications in Evolutionary Cultural Semiotics, vol. 1, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Wien, pp. 211–236.

48. Chalmers, D. J. (2002), Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Oxford University Press, New York, 688 p.

49. Penrose, R. (1994), Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness, Oxford University Press, New York, 474 p.

50. Rizzolatti, G. and Arbib, M. A. (1998), Language within our grasp, Trends in neurosciences, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 188–194.

51. Rizzolatti, G. and Craighero, L. (2004), The mirror-neuron system, Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 27, pp. 169–192.

52. Wilkins, W. K. and Wakefield, J. (1995), Brain evolution and neurolinguistic preconditions, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 18, pp. 161–182.

53. Corballis, M. C. (2003), From Hand to Mouth: The Origins of Language, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 272 p.

54. Henshilwood, C., d’Errico, F., Vanhaeren, M., Van Niekerk, K. and Jacobs, Z. (2004), Middle stone age shell beads from South Africa, Science, vol. 304, no. 5669, p. 404.

55. Wurz, S. (2002), Variability in the middle stone age lithic sequence, 115,000–60,000 years ago at Klasies river, South Africa, Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1001–1015.

56. Masataka, N. (2007), Music, evolution and language, Developmental science, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 35–39.

57. Chi, Z., Wu, W., Haga, Z., Hatsopoulos, N. G. and Margoliash, D. (2007), Template-based spike pattern identification with linear convolution and dynamic time warping, Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 1221–1235.

58. Reuland, E. (2008), “Language — symbolization and beyond”, in Knight, C. and Botha, R. (eds), The Prehistory of Language, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 201–224.

59. Yip, M. (2006), “Is there such a thing as animal phonology?” in Bakovic, E., Junko, I. and McCarthy, J. J. (eds), Wondering at the Natural Fecundity of Things: Essays in Honor of Alan Prince, Linguists Research Center, University of California, Santa Cruz, pp. 311–323.

60. Dediu, D. and Levinson, S. C. (2018), Neanderthal language revisited: not only us, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, vol. 21, pp. 49–55.

61. Pinker, S. and Jackendoff, R. S. (2005), The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition, vol. 95, pp. 201–236.

62. Reznikova, Zh. (2007), Animal Intelligence: From Individual to Social Cognition, Cambridge University Press, New York, xiv, 472 p.

63. Gentner, T. Q., Fenn, K. M., Margoliash, D. and Nusbaum, H. C. (2006), Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds, Nature, vol. 440, no. 7088, p. 1204–1207.

64. Zorina, Z. A. and Smirnova, A. A. (2006), What the “talking” monkeys talked about, Iazyki slavianskikh kul’tur Publ., Moscow, 424 p. (In Russian)

65. Ivanov, V. V. (2004), Linguistics of the Third Millennium: Questions for the Future, Iazyki slavianskikh kul’tur Publ., Moscow, 208 p. (In Russian)

66. Tattersall, I. (2004), What happened in the origin of human consciousness? The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist, vol. 276, no. 1, pp. 19–26.

67. Grodzinsky, Y. and Nelken, I. (2014), The neural code that makes us human, Science, vol. 343, no. 6174, pp. 978–979.

68. Johansson, S. (2015), Language abilities in Neanderthals, Annual Review of Linguistics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 311–332.

69. Borinskaya, S. A. and Yankovsky, N. K. (2015), Combination of genetic and humanitarian (cross-cultural) methods for the identification of human genes involved in the process of adaptation to evolutionary new environmental factors, Russian Journal of Genetics, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 397–407.

Опубликован

31.03.2020

Как цитировать

Черниговская , Т. В. (2020). Биология, среда и культура: от коммуникации животных к человеческому языку и познанию. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология, 36(1), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.113