Human brain and ambiguity of cognitive information: A convergent approach

Authors

  • Tatiana V. Chernigovskaya St. Petersburg State University
  • Viktor M. Allakhverdov St. Petersburg State University
  • Alexander D. Korotkov  N. P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Valeria A.  Gershkovich St. Petersburg State University
  • Maxim V. Kireev St. Petersburg State University
  • Veronika K. Prokopenya St. Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.406

Abstract

The article analyses the implementation of the convergent approach on the example of studying mechanisms for selecting meanings in situations of ambiguity by the methods of cognitive psychology, linguistics, and neurophysiology. We describe the rationale of the problem statement for convergent research and the necessary prerequisites for implementing an interdisciplinary approach. We consider that in case of ambiguity resolution the special mechanism provides the choice: which meaning would enter consciousness (and he / she becomes aware of it), and which — is rejected. That being said, the unselected meaning is not simply ignored, but rather actively suppressed. Such suppression results in its negative after-effect; more precisely the difficulty of retrieving the previously suppressed information. In our research the fMRI method made it possible to study brain mechanisms involved in the selection of a word’s meaning while behavioral methods allowed for the study of the after-effects of this selection. Thanks to the mutual development of a design by representatives of cognitive psychology, linguistics, and neurophysiology, it is possible to overcome the considerable methodological incompatibility of those methods. The results discovered in behavioral psychological research demonstrated negative after-effects of the rejected meaning. However, without the neurophysiological approach the data would remain unclear due to two possible interpretations. As a result of the analysis of the brain functional activity, the decrease in the localized hippocampal activity during the selection of meaning for an ambiguous word was revealed. This supports the hypothesis that the involvement of suppression processes in ambiguity resolution exists. Our work once again illustrates how important forethought and a philosophical foundation of the question posed is for interdisciplinary research regarding the processes of brain mechanisms. Unification of the efforts of representatives of various sciences provides qualitative new knowledge, which would not be possible to achieve in a different experimental situation. 

Keywords:

convergent approach, multidisciplinary research, ambiguity, meaning selection, brain mechanisms

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

1. Анохин, К. В. (2017), Мозг, сознание, интеллект: проект «когнитома», в Зиновьева, О. М., Солодухин, Ю. Н., Лепехин, В. А. и Зиновьева, К. А. (ред.), Александр Зиновьев и актуальные проблемы логики и методологии, М.: Канон+, с. 230–236.

2. Лекторский, В. А. (2011), Исследование интеллектуальных процессов в современной когнитивной науке: философские проблемы, в Дубровский, Д. И. и Лекторский, В. А. (ред.), Естественный и искусственный интеллект, М.: Канон+, с. 3–16.

3. Дубровский, Д. И. (2011), Актуальные проблемы интерсубъективности, в Дубровский, Д. И. и Лекторский, В. А. (ред.), Естественный и искусственный интеллект, М.: Канон+, с. 129–148.

4. Александров, Ю. И. (2009), От теории функциональных систем к системной психофизиологии, в Журавлева, А. Л., Сергиенко, Е. А. и Карпова, А. В. (ред.), Психология сегодня: теория, образование, практика, М.: Институт психологии РАН, с. 13–56.

5. Чалмерс, Д. (2013), Сознающий ум. В поисках фундаментальной теории, пер. Васильев, В. В., М.: URSS, Либроком.

6. Crick, F. and Koch, Ch. (2007), A neurobiological framework for consciousness, in Velmans, M. and Schneider, S. (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness, Oxford: Blackwell, p. 567–579.

7. Серл, Дж. (2002), Открывая сознание заново, пер. Грязнов, А. Ф., М.: Идея-Пресс.

8. Черниговская, Т. В. (2012), Языки сознания: кто читает тексты нейронной сети?, в Автономова, Н. С., Пружинин, Б. И. и Щедрина, Т. Г. (ред.), Человек в мире знания: К 80-летию Владислава Александровича Лекторского, М.: РОССПЭН, с. 403–415.

9. Черниговская, Т. В. (2017), Чеширская улыбка кота Шрёдингера: язык и сознание, М.: Языки славянской культуры.

10. Дубровский, Д. И. (2015), Проблема «сознание и мозг»: Теоретическое решение, М.: Канон+.

11. Велихов, Е. П., Котов, А. А., Лекторский, В. А. и Величковский, Б. М. (2018), Междисциплинарные исследования сознания: 30 лет спустя, Вопросы философии, № 12, с. 5–17.

12. Чернавский, Д. С. (2014), Синергетика и информация. Динамическая теория информации, М.: Либроком.

13. Асмолов, А. Г., Шехтер, Е. Д. и Черноризов, А. М. (2018), Родословная «жизни сообща»: еще раз о скачках эволюции, Вопросы психологии, № 4, с. 3–19.

14. Дубровский, Д. И. (2017), Сознание как «загадка» и «тайна»: к парадоксам «радикального когнитивизма», Вопросы философии, № 9, с. 151–161.

15. Зинченко, В. П. и Моргунов, Е. Б. (1994), Человек развивающийся, М.: Тривола.

16. Аллахвердов, В. М. (1993), Опыт теоретической психологии, СПб.: Печатный двор.

17. Rubin, E. (1921), Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren, Copenhagen: Gyldendalske.

18. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1991), Cognitive processes and mechanisms in language comprehension: The structure building framework, in Bower, G. H. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, New York: Academic Press, p. 217–263.

19. VanRullen, R. and Koch, C. (2003), Competition and selection during visual processing of natural scenes and objects, Journal of Vision, vol. 3 (1), p. 75–85.

20. Tipper, S. P. (1985), The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 37 (4), p. 571–590.

21. Filippova, M. G. (2011), Does Unconscious Information Affect Cognitive Activity: A Study Using Experimental Priming, The Spanish Journal of Psychology, vol. 14 (1), p. 17–33.

22. Peterson, M. A., Cacciamani, L., Mojica, A. J. and Sanguinetti, J. L. (2012), Meaning can be accessed for the ground side of a figure, Journal of Gestalt Theory, vol. 34 (3), p. 297–314.

23. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A. and Bjork, E. L. (1994), Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, vol. 20, p. 1063–1087.

References

1. Anohin, K. V. (2017), Brain, mind, intelligence: the “cognitome” project, in Zinov’eva, O. M., Soloduhin, Ju. N., Lepehin, V. A. and Zinov’eva, K. A. (eds), Aleksandr Zinov’ev i aktual’nye problemy logiki i metodologii, Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., pp. 230–236. (In Russian)

2. Lektorskii, V. A. (2011), Studies of intellectual processes in modern сognitive science: philosophical problems, in Dubrovskii, D. I. and Lektorskii, V. A. (eds), Estestvennyi i iskusstvennyi intellekt, Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., pp. 3–16. (In Russian)

3. Dubrovskii, D. I. (2011), Actual problems of intersubjectivity, in Dubrovskii, D. I. and Lektorskii, V. A. (eds), Estestvennyi i iskusstvennyi intellekt, Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., pp. 129–148. (In Russian)

4. Aleksandrov, Ju. I. (2009), From the theory of functional systems to systemic psychophysiology, in Zhuravl’eva, A. L., Sergienko, E. A. and Karpova, A. V. (eds), Psikhologiia segodnia: teoriia, obrazovanie, praktika, Moscow: IP RAN Publ., pp. 13–56. (In Russian)

5. Chalmers, D. (2013), The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, transl. by Vasil’ev, V., Moscow: URSS, Librokom Publ. (In Russian)

6. Crick, F. and Koch, Ch. (2007), A neurobiological framework for consciousness, in Velmans, M. and Schneider, S. (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 567–579.

7. Searle, J. (2002), The Rediscovery of the Mind, transl. by Griaznov, A., Moscow: Ideia-Press. (In Russian)

8. Chernigovskaia, T. V. (2012), Languages of mind: who reads texts of neural network, in Avtonomova, N. S., Pruzhinin, B. I. and Shchedrina, T. G. (eds), Chelovek v mire znaniia: K 80-letiiu Vladislava Aleksandrovicha Lektorskogo, Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., pp. 403–415. (In Russian)

9. Chernigovskaia, T. V. (2017), Cheshire Smile of Schrödinger’s Cat: Language and Mind, Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury Publ. (In Russian)

10. Dubrovskii, D. I. (2015), The problem “mind and brain”: theoretical solution, Moscow: Kanon+ Publ.(In Russian)

11. Velikhov, E. P., Kotov, A. A., Lektorskii, V. A. and Velichkovskii, B. M. (2018), Interdisciplinary Studies of Mind: 30 years later, Voprosy filosofii, no. 12, pp. 5–17. (In Russian)

12. Chernavskij, D. S. (2014), Synergetics and information. Dynamic information theory, Moscow: Librokom Publ. (In Russian)

13. Asmolov, A. G., Shekhter, E. D. and Chernorizov, A. M. (2018), Family tree of “life together”: once again about the leaps of evolution, Voprosy psikhologii, no. 4, pp. 3–19. (In Russian)

14. Dubrovskii, D. I. (2017), Mind as enigma and mystery: to the paradoxes of radical cognitivism, Voprosy filosofii, no. 9, pp. 151–161. (In Russian)

15. Zinchenko, V. P. and Morgunov, E. B. (1994), Developing human, Moscow: Trivola Publ. (In Russian)

16. Allakhverdov, V. M. (1993), Experience of theoretical psychology, St. Petersburg: Pechatnyi dvor Publ.(In Russian)

17. Rubin, E. (1921), Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren, Copenhagen: Gyldendalske.

18. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1991), Cognitive processes and mechanisms in language comprehension: The structure building framework, in Bower, G. H. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, New York: Academic Press, vol. 27, pp. 217–263.

19. VanRullen, R. and Koch, C. (2003), Competition and selection during visual processing of natural scenes and objects, Journal of Vision, vol. 3 (1), pp. 75–85.

20. Tipper, S. P. (1985), The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 37 (4), pp. 571–590.

21. Filippova, M. G. (2011), Does Unconscious Information Affect Cognitive Activity: A Study Using Experimental Priming, The Spanish Journal of Psychology, vol. 14 (1), pp. 17–33.

22. Peterson, M. A., Cacciamani, L., Mojica, A. J. and Sanguinetti, J. L. (2012), Meaning can be accessed for the ground side of a figure, Journal of Gestalt Theory, vol. 34 (3), pp. 297–314.

23. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A. and Bjork, E. L. (1994), Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, vol. 20, pp. 1063–1087.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

Chernigovskaya, T. V., Allakhverdov, V. M., Korotkov, A. D., Gershkovich, V. A., Kireev, M. V., & Prokopenya, V. K. (2020). Human brain and ambiguity of cognitive information: A convergent approach. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 36(4), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.406

Issue

Vol. 36 No. 4 (2020): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.