Plato’s Socrates and a new interpretation of the kosmos

Authors

  • Zuzana Zelinová Comenius University in Bratislava

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.105

Abstract

One of the most common problems encountered in present-day research into ancient natural philosophy is the question of when the term kosmos (κόσμος) began to be used not only for order, but also for the meaning of world order. This article attempts to argue that this new interpretation of kosmos is connected with Socratic thought and asserts that the Socratic anthropological turn can only be meaningfully discussed due to changes in the field of natural philosophy. This anthropological turn is best expressed by Roman orator and philosopher Cicero in his well-known work Tusculan Disputations. The article attempts to offer an interpretation based on the belief that the collocation world order presumes a philosophical turn towards a focus on humans and their internal world experiences. For the author’s interpretation, the specific concept of koinonia (κοινωνία) as it is found first in Empedocles’ fragments and later in Plato’s philosophy is important. The article consists of three parts: the first part deals with several traditional meanings of kosmos (Homer, Hesiod, Thales, Anaximenes, Anaximander, Heraclitus, Pythagoreans etc.), the second part with meanings that Socratic philosophy (especially Plato, partly Xenophon) assigns to the term, and the final part attempts to argue that it is explicitly Plato who first began using kosmos with the meaning of world or world order.

Keywords:

Empedocles, Socrates, Plato, kosmos, cosmology

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References

1. Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. and Schofield, M. (2004), Předsókratovští filosofové. Kritické dějiny s vybranými texty, Prague: Oikoymenh.

2. Schadewaldt, W. (1991), Homérova básnická ontologie, in Rezek, P. (ed.), Mýtus, epos a logos, Prague: Oikoymenh, pp. 27–47.

3. Gregory, A. (2011), Ancient Greek Cosmogony, Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.

4. Redding, J. (1949), Kosmos from Homer to St. John, The Asbury Seminarian, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 63–65.

5. Zhmud, L. (2012), Pythagoras and the Early Pythagoreans, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

6. Kahn, Ch. H. (1992), Užití termínu κοσμος v rané řecké filosofii, in Rezek, P. (ed.), Kosmos a živly, Prague: Oikoymenh, pp. 9–20.

7. Theodossiou, E. and Manimanis, V. N. (2010), The Cosmology of the pre-Socratic Greek Philosophers, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplement, vol. 15, pp. 204–209.

8. Dicks, D. R. (1970), Early Greek Astronomy, New York: Cornell University Press.

9. Furley, D. (1987), The Greek Cosmologist, vol. I: The Formation of the Atomic Theory and its Earlier Critics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10. Couprie, D. L. (2011), Heaven and Earth in Ancient Greek Cosmology. From Thales to Heraclides Ponticus, London: Springer Science + Business Media.

11. Jaeger, W. (1946), Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture, vol. I, transl. by Highet, G., Oxford: Oxford, Blackwell.

12. Kahn, Ch. H. (1960), Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology, Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

13. Hobza, P. (2004), Aristotelés a Theofrastos jako tvůrci mílétské filosofie, Filosofický časopis, no. 6, pp. 889–924.

14. Kratochvíl, Z. (2003), Filosofie živé přírody, Prague: H&H.

15. Finkelberg, A. (1998), On the History of the Greek κοσμος, Harvard Sudies in Classical Philology, vol. 98, pp. 103–136.

16. Huffman, C. A. (1993), Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic: A commentary on the Fragments and Testimonia with Interpretative Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

17. Mansfeld, J. (1971), The Pseudo-Hippocratic Tract Peri Hebdomadoon: Ch 1–11 and Greek Philosophy (Philosophical Texts & Studies), Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-31

How to Cite

Zelinová, Z. (2021). Plato’s Socrates and a new interpretation of the kosmos. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 37(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.105

Issue

Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.