Своеобразие философского дискурса Н.А. Бердяева

Alexandr V. Usachev

doi:10.21638/spbu17.2023.407

Authors

Alexandr V. Usachev Bunin Yelets State University, 28, ul. Communarov, Yelets, 399770, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.407

Abstract

To refute the opinion about the chaotic presentation of problems in Berdyaev’s texts, the dominant of the unconscious, means to fall into ontological dependence on them. In the literal sense, these are not conclusions drawn on the basis of an analysis of N.A. Berdyaev’s work, but quoting the philosopher’s self-assessment, to which he resorted more than once. They have no analytical and heuristic value. N.A. Berdyaev’s way of thinking simultaneously contains Christian intuitions and an oppositional structure characteristic of philosophical creativity in general. The peculiarities of the Russian philosopher’s thinking are reflected in the fact that such types of philosophical creativity as personalism, existentialism, as well as intuitive components of the Eastern Christian worldview are organically combined. In the philosophy of N.A. Berdyaev there are also cosmological components, which contain the statement that the world is entering the era of the third period, which is expressed in its structure contains the statement that the time for freedom and creativity is coming. The peculiarities of N.A. Berdyaev’s thinking can be evaluated from the point of view of aesthetics and uniqueness, which significantly distinguish his way of thinking from the typical development of philosophical thinking of Modern times. According to the Russian philosopher, analysis and splitting cannot serve as a starting point for the thought process. Without creativity and freedom, the philosophy of the non-classical period has no significance and significance, because the potential of formal and dialectical logic has already clearly and fundamentally affected the best examples of classical philosophy. The third level is binarism, which formally has generic signs of the organization of problematic thinking of logocentric sciences, but the specific differences are too striking to pass by them without specifying anything.

Keywords:

religious philosophy, existentialism, personalism, logocentrism, dichotomy, binary opposition

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Усачев, А.В. (2008), Проблема онтологического статуса религиозного компонента в русской философии конца XIX первой половины XX века: дис. … д-ра филос. наук, Тула.

Полторацкий, Н.П. (1975), Н.А. Бердяев, в: Полторацкий, Н.П. (ред.), Русская религиозно-философская мысль XX века: сб. ст., Питтсбург, с. 190–204.

Соловьев, В.С. (1988), Сочинения: в 2 т., т. 1., М.: Мысль.

Gaisin, A. (2018), Solovyov’s metaphysics between gnosis and theurgy, Religions, vol. 9, is. 11. https:// doi.org/10.3390/rel9110354

Полипчук, Д.С. (2014), Некоторые особенности философии религии И.Ильина, Вестник Тамбовского государственного университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки, № 4, с. 15–21.

Tsambassis, A. (1964), The Berdyaev’s Personalistic Philosophy, Personalist, no. 10, Los Angeles, pp. 34–45.

Франк, С. Л. (1990), Сочинения, М.: Правда.

Бердяев, Н.А. (2003), О назначении человека. Опыт парадоксальной этики, М.: Фолио.

Киейзик, Л.-Б. (2018), Критический марксизм Н.А. Бердяева — период формирования (в свете неопубликованной переписки с К.Каутским), Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология, т. 34, вып. 2, с. 177–185. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.204

Бердяев, Н.А. (2007), Я и мир объектов, М.: АСТ; Хранитель.

Bodea, R.-O. (2019), Nikolai Berdyaev’s Dialectics of Freedom, In Search for Spiritual Freedom Open Theology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0023

Маркс, К. и Энгельс, Ф. (1989), Немецкая идеология, М.: Политиздат.

Хайдеггер, М. (1993), Время и бытие, М: Республика.

Шестов, Л. (1993), Potestes clavium (Власть ключей), в: Шестов, Л., Сочинения, в 2 т., т. 1, М.: Наука, с. 15–311.

Бердяева, Л. (2002), Профессия: жена философа, М.: Молодая гвардия.

Гуссерль, Э. (2000), Логические исследования, Минск, М.: АСТ.

Rojek, P. (2019), God and Cogito: Semen Frank on the ontological argument, Studies in East European Thought, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-019-09326-5

Бердяев, Н.А. (1989), Смысл творчества, М.: Правда.

Inishev, I. (2018), Heidegger and Russian philosophizing: The productivity of the distance, Horizon. Studies in Phenomenologyv, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 546–553. https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2018-7-2-546-553

Бердяев, Н.А. (2000), Судьба России, М.: Эксмо-Пресс.

Лосский, Н.О. (1991), Избранное, М.: Правда.

Рильке, Р.М. (2003), Стихотворения, М.: Радуга.

Бердяев, Н.А. (2002), Новое Cредневековье, в: Бердяев, Н.А., Смысл творчества, М.: АСТ, с. 15–412.

Hughes, R.A. (2014), Nikolai Berdyaev’s Apophaticism, St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly, vol. 58, is. 2, pp. 441–455.

Гробер, Е.М. и Бодров, А.А. (2015), Рецепция идей Н.А. Бердяева в современной социально-экономической действительности, Научно-методический электронный журнал «Концепт», т. 13, с. 1476–1480. URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2015/85296.htm (дата обращения: 03.11.2019).

Шкода, В.В. (2000), О человеке, который ставил свободу выше Бога, в: Бердяев, Н.А., Судьба России, М.: Эксмо-Пресс, c. 5–24.

Бердяев, Н.А. (2003), О рабстве и свободе человека, в: Бердяев, Н.А., Опыт парадоксальной этики, М.: Фолио, c. 14–329.

Дендиберя, А.А. (2015), Идеи Н.А. Бердяева о государстве и праве, Философия права, № 7, с. 44–53.

References

Usachev, A.V. (2008), The problem of the ontological status of the religious component in Russian philosophy of the late 19th — first half of the 20th century: Dr. Sci. thesis in Philosophy, Tula. (In Russian)

Poltorackij, N.P. (1975), N.A.Berdyaev, in: Poltorackij, N.P. (ed.), Russkaia religiozno-filosofskaia mysl’ XX veka: sb. st., Pittsburg, pp. 190–204. (In Russian)

Solovyev, V. S. (1988), Essays, in 2 vols, vol. 1, Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Gaisin, A. (2018), Solovyov’s metaphysics between gnosis and theurgy, Religions, vol. 9, is. 11. https:// doi.org/10.3390/rel9110354

Polipchuk, D. S. (2014), Some features of I.Ilyin’s philosophy of religion, Vestnik Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye nauki, no. 4, pp. 15–21. (In Russian)

Tsambassis, A. (1964), The Berdyaev’s Personalistic Philosophy, Personalist, no. 10, Los Angeles, pp. 34–45.

Frank, S.L. (1990), Essays, Moscow: Pravda Publ. (In Russian)

Berdyaev, N.A. (2003), About the appointment of a person. The experience of paradoxical ethics, Moscow: Folio Publ. (In Russian)

Kiejzik, L. (2018), The beginnings of Berdyaev’s critical marxism (in light of his unpublished correspondence with Kautsky), Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, vol. 34, is. 2, pp. 177–185. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.204 (In Russian)

Berdyaev, N.A. (2007), I and the world of objects, Moscow: AST Publ.; Khranitel’ Publ. (In Russian)

Bodea, R.-O. (2019), Nikolai Berdyaev’s Dialectics of Freedom, In Search for Spiritual Freedom Open Theology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0023

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1989), German ideology, Moscow: Politizdat Publ. (In Russian)

Heidegger, M. (1993), Time and being, Moscow: Respublika Publ. (In Russian)

Shestov, L. (1993), Potestes clavium (The power of keys), in: Shestov, L., Sochineniia, in 2 vols, vol. 1, Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp. 15–311. (In Russian)

Berdyaeva, L. (2002), Profession: The philosopher’s wife, Moscow: Molodaia gvardiia Publ. (In Russian)

Husserl, E. (2000), Logical research, Minsk, Moscow: AST Publ. (In Russian)

Rojek, P. (2019), God and Cogito: Semen Frank on the ontological argument, Studies in East European Thought, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-019-09326-5

Berdyaev, N.A. (1989), The meaning of creativity, Moscow: Pravda Publ. (In Russian)

Inishev, I. (2018), Heidegger and Russian philosophizing: The productivity of the distance, Horizon, Studies in Phenomenology, no. 7, no. 2, pp. 546–553. https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2018-7-2-546-553

Berdyaev, N.A. (2000), The fate of Russia, Moscow: Eksmo-Press. (In Russian)

Losskij, N.O. (1991), Favourites, Moscow: Pravda Publ. (In Russian)

Rilke, R.M. (2003), Poems, Moscow: Raduga Publ. (In Russian)

Berdyaev, N.A. (2002), The New Middle Ages, in: Berdyaev, N.A., Smysl tvorchestva, Moscow: AST Publ., pp. 15–412. (In Russian)

Hughes, R.A. (2014), Nikolai Berdyaev’s Apophaticism, St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly, vol. 58, is. 2, pp. 441–455.

Grober, E.M. and Bodrov, A.A. (2015), Reception of N.A. Berdyaev’s ideas in modern socioeconomic activity, Nauchno-metodicheskii elektronnyi zhurnal “Kontsept” , vol. 13, pp. 1476–1480. Available at: http://e-koncept.ru/2015/85296.htm (accessed: 03.11.2019). (In Russian)

Shkoda, V.V. (2000), About a man who put freedom above God, in: Berdyaev, N.A., Sud’ba Rossii, Moscow: Eksmo-Press, pp. 5–24. (In Russian)

Berdyaev, N.A. (2003), About slavery and human freedom, in: Berdyaev, N.A., Opyt paradoksal’noi etiki, Moscow: Folio Publ., pp. 14–329. (In Russian)

Dendiberya, A.A. (2015), N.A.Berdyaev’s ideas about the state and law, Filosofiia prava, no. 7, pp. 44–53. (In Russian)