Alexandre Koyré and the new historiography of science

Authors

  • Tamara B. Dlugatsch Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 12, Goncharnaya ul., Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.101

Abstract

The author’s task is to draw attention once again to the philosophical and historical research method invented by A.Koyré, who, according to many, revolutionized historiography. The aim is to show the dependence of major scientific discoveries on fundamental transformations in philosophy. From this perspective, the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century is considered: Galileo’s discovery of the inertial movement was determined by a change in ideas about the Universe. The closed, hierarchically ordered world of Aristotle, characteristic of Antiquity and the Middle Ages, was replaced by a picture of an infinite Universe. In it, the same laws apply to celestial bodies and the Earth, and the circular motion of bodies is replaced by the motion along an infinite straight line, i. e., inertial. In this connection, Galileo’s Dialogues are carefully and thoroughly examined, in which he appears not only as a brilliant scientist, but also as a Socratically minded philosopher. The discoveries of Galileo and Newton are correctly evaluated as the creation of new foundations of scientific theory as compared with those previous, and the reasons for the appearance of such new foundations are explained. The novelty of the article also lies in the fact that the success of Koyré’s analysis is presented in the context of a dispute — a dialogue of the greatest scientific minds — of Aristotle and Plato, Descartes and Newton. Highly appreciating the achievements of A.Koyré, the author dwells on some of the shortcomings of his method: underestimation of social transformations and lack of attention to the reverse effect of science on philosophy. It also explains the limitations of the logical-deductive movement of thought in science, which determined philosophers, in particular, Kant, to come to the idea of the need to create meaningful logic, although an unknowable thing-in-itself appeared as the content.

Keywords:

science, philosophy, revolution in science, A.Koyre, method, motion, Universe, Galileo, Newton

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Дроздова, Д.Н. (2015), Место Александра Койре в историографии науки XX века, История философии, т. 20, № 1, с. 253–273.

Койре, А. (1985), Очерки истории философской мысли: о влиянии философских концепций на развитие научных теорий, пер. с франц. Ляткер, Я.А.,М.: Наука.

Библер, В.С. (1991), От наукоучения к логике культуры, М.: Наука.

Арсеньев, А.С., Библер, В.С. и Кедров, Б.М. (1967), Анализ развивающегося понятия, М.: Наука.

Ямпольская, А.В. (2015), Истина в политической философии Платона: интерпретации Койре и Хайдеггера, История философии, т. 20, № 1, с. 232–252.

Valleriani, L. (2010), Galileo Engineer, Dordrecht; Heidelberg; New York: Springer

Галилей, Г. (1948), Диалог о двух главнейших системах мира — птолемеевой и коперниковой, пер. Долгов, А.И., М.; Л.: ОГИЗ СССР.

Декарт, Р. (1950), Избранные произведения, М.: Мысль

Декарт, Р. (1949), Начала философии, в: Декарт, Р. Сочинения, М.: Мысль, т. 1.

Ньютон, И. (1915–1916), Математические начала натуральной философии, пер. Крылов, А.Н., Известия Николаевской морской академии, Пг.

Ньютон, И. (1954), Оптика, или Трактат об отражениях, преломлениях, изгибаниях и цветах света, пер. с примеч. Вавилов, С.И., М.: Госиздат.

Вавилов, С.И. (1945), Исаак Ньютон, 1643–1727, М.; Л.: АН СССР.

Cohen, I.B. (1980), The Newtonian Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chimisso, C. (2008), Writing the History of the Mind: Philosophy and Science in France, 1900 to 1960s, New York: Ashgate Publishing.

Geroulanus, S. (2010), An Atheism that is not Humanist Emerges in French Thought, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Guerlac, H. (1977), Newton and the Method of Analysis, in: Guerlac, H.Essays and Papers in the History of Modern Science, Baltimore; London: John Hopkins University Press, pp. 193–216.

Koyré, A. (1939–1940), Études galiléennes, Paris: Hermann, t. 1–3.

Koyré, A. (1966), Études de la pensée scientifique, Paris: Gallimard.

Кoyré, A. (1961), Études d’histoire de la pensée philosophique, Paris: Gallimard.

Pisano, R., Agassi, I. and Drozdova, D. (eds) (2018), Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science: Homage to Alexandre Koyré 1892–1964, Springer Verlag.

Sambelli, P. (2016), The many lives of Alexandre Koyré, Firenze: Olschki.

Stump, J.B. (2001), History of Science through Кoyré’s Lenses, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part A, vol. 32, no. 2, p. 243–263.


References

Drozdova, D.N. (2015), Alexandre Koyré in the Historiography of Science of the 20th century, History of Philosophy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 253–273. (In Russian)

Koyré, А. (1985), Essays in the History of Philosophical Thought. On the Influence of Philosophical Concepts in the Development of Theories?, Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Bibler, V. S. (1991), From the Science of Knowledge to the Logic of Culture, Moscow: Nauka Publ.(In Russian)

Arsen’ev, A. S., Bibler, V. S. and Kedrov, B.М. (1967), Analysis of an evolving concept, Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Iampol’skaia, A.V. (2015), Truth in the Political Philosophy of Plato: Interpretations by Alexandre Koyré and Martin Heidegger, History of Philosophy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 232–252. (In Russian)

Valleriani, L. (2010), Galileo Engineer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York: Springer

Galilei, G. (1948), The Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, transl. by Dolgov, A., Moscow and Leningrad: OGIZ SSSR Publ. (In Russian)

Descartes, R. (1949), Principles of Philosophy, in: Descartes, R. Works, vol. 1, Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Descartes, R. (1950), Selected Works, Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Newton, I. (1915–1916), Mathematical principles of natural philosophy, Izvestiia Nikolaevskoi morskoi akademii, Petrograd. (In Russian)

Newton, I. (1954), Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light, transl. by Vavilov, S.I., Moscow: Gosizdat Publ. (In Russian)

Vavilov, S.I. (1945), Isaac Newton, 1643–1727, Moscow; Leningrad: AN SSSR Publ. (In Russian)

Cohen, I.B. (1980), The Newtonian Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chimisso, C. (2008), Writing the History of the Mind: Philosophy and Science in France, 1900 to 1960s, New York: Ashgate Publishing.

Geroulanus, S. (2010), An Atheism that is not Humanist Emerges in French Thought, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Guerlac, H. (1977), Newton and the Method of Analysis, in: Guerlac, H.Essays and Papers in the History of Modern Science, Baltimore; London: The John Hopkins University Press, pp. 193–216.

Koyré, A. (1939–1940), Études galiléennes, t. 1–3. Paris: Hermann.

Кoyré, A. (1961), Études d’histoire de la pensée philosophique, Paris: Gallimard

Koyré, A. (1966), Études de la pensée scientifique, Paris: Gallimard.

Pisano, R., Agassi, I. and Drozdova, D. (eds) (2018), Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophie of Science. Hormage to Alexandra Koyré 1892–1964. Springer Verlag.

Sambelli, P. (2016), The many lives of Alexandre Koyré, Firenze: Olschki.

Stump, J.B. (2001), History of Science through Кoyré’s Lenses, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part A, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 243–263, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00011-5

Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология, Том 38, No 1, 2022

Downloads

Published

2022-06-16

How to Cite

Dlugatsch, T. B. (2022). Alexandre Koyré and the new historiography of science. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 38(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.101

Issue

Vol. 38 No. 1 (2022): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.