The destiny of the Russian philosophy and modernity. Transformations of values and transformation of models. Part I

Authors

  • Владимир Юрьевич Быстров St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St.Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Владимир Михайлович Камнев St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St.Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.302

Abstract

New historical and philosophical approach to a solution to the problem of continuity in the development of the Russian philosophy is presented in the article. The phenomenon of the Russian philosophy is exposed as a dispozitiv - as a peculiar combination of the diverse elements connected with each other only in the external way. The Russian pre-revolutionary philosophy, the Soviet philosophy, and Post-Soviet philosophy represent only qualitatively peculiar forms of the same phenomenon or stages of its development. The historian of philosophy who considers the Russian philosophy as a dispozitiv needs to disclose, first, internal heterogeneity of the Russian philosophy, i.e. to present it as a dispozitiv, and secondly, to define basic elements, components this dispozitiv and to track in what measure they remain at these three stages. We allocate three such elements, proceeding from the fact that concerningthe first element there is the standard recognition that it is an element which is called “the Russian idea”. The second element is characterized by the specific relation to metaphysics. The third element of that dispozitiv represents an understanding of the situation of choice between knowledge and belief, science and religion. Further, these elements of the dispozitiv of the Russian philosophy will be given more detailed characteristic. The historian of philosophy in his work quite often cannot get rid of the hypnotic impact of the natural process of transformation of values that characterizes the studied phenomenon and remains at the level of the description. This approach allows historian of philosophy to overcome superficial and unilateral approaches and to see internal constancy of the phenomenon of the Russian philosophy that remains invariable.

Keywords:

Russian philosophy, historian of philosophy, dispozitiv, method, reason

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Агамбен Дж. Что современно. Киев: Дух и Литера, 2012. 78 с.

Соловьев В. С. Леонтьев // Соловьев В. С. Сочинения: в 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1988. Т. 2. С. 417–422.

Соловьев В. С. Русская идея // Соловьев В. С. Смысл любви / сост., вступит. ст. и коммент. Н. И. Цимбаева. М.: Современник, 1991. С. 41–68.

Гройс Б. Россия как подсознание Запада // Гройс Б. Утопия и обмен. М.: Знак, 1993. С. 245–259.

Чаадаев П. Я. Апология сумасшедшего // Чаадаев П. Я. Избранные сочинения и письма. М.: Правда, 1991. С. 142–157.

Гегель — фон Икскюлю, Берлин, 28 ноября 1821 г. // Гегель Г. В. Ф. Работы разных лет: в 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1973. Т. 2. С. 407.

П. Я. Чаадаев: pro et contra. Личность и творчествo Петра Чаадаева в оценке русских мыслите¬лей и исследователей. СПб.: РХГА, 1998. 871 с.

Хомяков А. С . О старом и новом // Хомяков А. С. Сочинения: в 2 т. М.: Московский философ¬ский фонд; Изд-во «Медиум», 1994. Т. 1. С 456–470.

Адамович Г. Комментарии. СПб.: Алетейя, 1999. 560 с.

Маилов А. И. Русская религиозная философия в «Пути»: вып. 1–3. СПб.: Изд-во Высших гуманитарных курсов, 1992. Вып. 1, ч. 1–2. 68 с.

Достоевский Ф. М. Бесы // Достоевский Ф. М. Собрание сочинений: в 10 т. М.: Государствен¬ное изд-во художественной литературы, 1957. Т. 7. 760 с.

Соловьев В. С. Три речи в память Достоевского // Соловьев В. С. Сочинения: в 2 т. М.: Мысль, 1988. Т. 2. С. 292–326.

Казинцев А. И. Вдохновенная ошибка. «Пушкинская речь» Ф. М. Достоевского // Наш совре¬менник. 2017. № 11. С. 180–185.

Данилевский Н. Я. Россия и Европа. М.: Институт русской цивилизации, 2011. 816 с.

Леонтьев К. Н. Владимир Соловьев против Данилевского // Леонтьев К. Н. Славянофильство и грядущие судьбы России. М.: Институт русской цивилизации, 2010. С. 813–912.

Леонтьев К. Н. Византизм и славянство. // Леонтьев К. Н. Полное собрание сочинений и пи¬сем: в 12 т. СПб.: Владимир Даль, 2005. Т. 7, кн. 1. С. 299–442.

References

Agamben J. Chto sovremenno [What is modern]. Kiev, Dukh i Litera Publ., 2012. 78 p. (In Russian)

Solov’ev V. S. Leont’ev [Leontjev]. Solov’ev V. S. Sochineniia [Works] , in 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow, Mysl’, 1988, pp. 417–422. (In Russian)

Solov’ev V. S. Russkaia ideia [Russian Idea]. Solov’ev V. S. Smysl liubvi [The Meaning of Love] . Moscow, Sovremennik, 1991, pp. 41–68. (In Russian)

Groys B. Rossiia kak podsoznanie Zapada [Russia as subconsciousness of the West]. Groys B. Utopia i obmen [Utopia and exchange] . Moscow, Znak, pp. 245–259. (In Russian)

Chaadaev P. Ia. Apologiia sumasshedshego [Apology of Madman]. Сhaadaev P. Ia. Izbrannye sochine¬niia i pis’ma [Selected essays and letters] . Moscow, Pravda Publ., pp 142–157. (In Russian)

Hegel — fon Ikskiuliu, Berlin, 28 noiabria 1821 g. [Hegel — von Ikskul. Berlin. 28 november 1821]. Hegel G. W. F. Raboty raznykh let [Work of different years] , in 2 vols. Moscow, Mysl’, 1973, p. 407. (In Russian)

P. Ia. Chaadaev: pro et contra: Lichnost’ i tvorchestvo Petra Chaadaeva v otsenke russkikh myslitelei i issledovatelei [P. Ya. Chaadaev: pro et contra: Personality and work of Peter Chaadayev valuated by Russian thinkers and researchers] . St. Petersburg, RKhGA, 1998. 871 p. (In Russian)

Khomiakov A. S. O starom i novom [About old and new]. Khomiakov A. S. Sochineniia [Works] , in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow, Medium Publ., pp. 456–470. (In Russian)

Adamovich G. Kommentarii [Comments] . St. Petersburg, Aleteiia, 1999. 560 p. (In Russian)

Mailov A. I. Russkaia religioznaia filosofiia v «Puti» [Russian philosophy in the “Way”] , is. 1–3. Is. 1, pt. 1–2. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo Vysshikh gumanitarnykh kursov, 1992. 68 p. (In Russian)

Dostoevskii F. M. Besy [Demons]. Dostoevskii F. M. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works] , in 10 vols. Vol. 7. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izd-vo khudozhestvennoi literatury, 1957. 760 p. (In Russian)

Solov’ev V. S. Tri rechi v pamiat’ Dostoevskogo [Three speeches in memory of Dostoevsky]. Solov’ev V. S. Sochineniia [Works], in 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow, Mysl’, 1988, pp. 292–326. (In Russian)

Kazintsev A. I. Vdokhnovennaia oshibka. «Pushkinskaia rech’» F. M. Dostoevskogo [Inspired mistake. Pushkin`s speech of Dostoevsky]. Nash sovremennik , 2017, no. 11, pp. 180–185. (In Russian)

Danilevskii N. Ia. Rossiia i Evropa [Russia and Europe] . Moscow, Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2011. 816 p. (In Russian)

Leont’ev K. N. Vladimir Solov’ev protiv Danilevskogo [Vladimir Solovjev against Danilevsky]. Leont’ev K. N. Slavianofil’stvo i griadushchie sud’by Rossii [Slavophilia and future destiny of Russia] . Moscow, Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2010, pp. 813–912. (In Russian)

Leont’ev K. N. Vizantizm i slavianstvo [Byzantism and Slavic]. Leont’ev K. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem [Complete works and letters] , in 12 vols. Vol. 7, book 1. St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’, 2005, pp. 299–442. (In Russian)

Published

2018-12-07

How to Cite

Быстров, В. Ю., & Камнев, В. М. (2018). The destiny of the Russian philosophy and modernity. Transformations of values and transformation of models. Part I. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 34(3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.302