Language as Eigenform: Semiotics in the search of a meaning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2018.402Abstract
The problem of how signs acquire their meaning is characteristic of both the philosophy of language of the analytic tradition (Quine, Frege, Peirce, Wittgeinstein) and the continental
one (Saussure, Hjelmslev, Jacobson, Bloomfield). At present, most scholars are inclined either to point out the priority of objects over the system of signs, or the system over the objects. However, neither version suggests a satisfactory solution.. On the one hand, we believe that the language and the world are external to each other and are independent from each other; but on the other hand, we cannot construct a model of language independent from the world (what does language denote, in that case?) and the world independent from the language (how is a world possible if it is not referenced?). This situation poses a problem. The Eigenform model can help shed light on it and suggests coherent solution; this model the possibility of overcoming the ‘dilemma of preceding’ (whether the language precedes the world or the world precedes the language). Similarly to the dilemma of observation (observer) and the world (whether observation (observer) precedes the world or vice versa), the Eigenform model shows that neither the signifier nor the signified precede the other, but rather intercondition each other. Thus, language creates the world of objects but is shaped by the world in turn. Unlike a similar language model developed by L.Wittgenstein, Eigenform model stipulates the principle of the world-language generation in a complex system of involved and/or mutual interpretations. The interpreter generates a meaning in the world, and in this process the interpreter himself is being formed as an interpretation (in particular, self-interpretation).
Keywords:
Eigenform, language, meaning, semiotics, semiosis, reference, self-reference, recursiveness, sign
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
References
Haken, H. (1977), Synergetics , Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Spinoza, B. (2002), “Ethics”, in and ed. by Morgan, Michael L. (ed.), Spinoza: Complete Works, transl. by Shirley, S., Hackett, Indianapolis, IN.
Füllsack, M. (2014), “The circular conditions of second-order science sporadically illustrated with agent-based experiments at the roots of observation”, Constructivist Foundations, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 46–54.
Bredin, H. (1984), “Sign and Value in Saussure”, Philosophy, vol. 59, no. 227, pp. 66–77.
Erickson, M. J. (2000), Truth or Consequences, IVP, Downers Grove, IL.
Kauffman, S. (2003), “Eigenforms — Objects as Tokens for Eigenbehaviors”, Cybernetics and Human Knowing, vol. 10, no. 3–4, pp. 73–90.
Deleuze, G. (1969), Logique du sens, Les éditions de Minuit (coll.“Critiqu”), Paris, France.
Escher, M. C. (1989), Escher on Escher: Exploring the Infinite, Harry N. Abrams, New York, NY.
Saussure, F. de (1983), Course in General Linguistics (trans. Roy Harris), Duckworth, London, UK.
Maturana, H.; Varela, F. (1987), The Tree of Knowledge, New Science Library, Boston, MA.
Kauffman, S. (2005), “Eigenform, Kybernetes”, The International Journalof Systems and Cybernetics, vol. 34, no. 1/2, pp. 129–150.
Benveniste, Е. (1971), Problems in general linguistics, in 2 vols., transl. by Mary Elizabeth Meek, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Fl.
Piaget, J. (1977), The Grasp of Consciousness: Action and concept in the young child, Routledge — Kegan Paul, London, UK.
Kampis, G. (1991), Self-Modifying Systems in Biology and Cognitive Science, Oxford, New York, Pergamon Press.
Gasparyan, D. (2015), “What can the global observer know?’, Constructivist Foundations, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 300–310.
Carnap, R. (1956), Meaning and Necessity: a Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Russell, B. (1905), “On Denoting”, Mind, New Series, vol. 14, no. 56, pp. 479–493.
Rocha, L. M. (1996 b), “Eigenbehavior and symbols”, Systems Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 371–384.
Umerez, J. (1995), “Semantic Closure: A guiding notion to ground Artificial Life”, in Moran, F., Moreno, A., Merelo, J.#J. and Chacon, P. (eds.), Advances in Artificial Life, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 77–94.
Piaget, J. (1954), The construction of reality in the child, Basic Books, New York, NY.
Barthes, R. (1966), “Introduction à l’analyse structurale des récits”, Communications, , no. 8, pp. 7–33.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Phenomenology of spirit, , transl. by A. V. Miller with analysis of the text and foreword by J. N. Findlay, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
Foerster, H. (1977), “Objects: tokens for (eigen-)behaviors”, in Inhelder, B., Gracia, R. and Voneche, J. (eds.), Hommage a Jean Piaget: Epistemologie Genetique et Equilibration, Delachaux et Niestel; Neuchâtel, France.
Chomsky, N. (1968), Language and mind, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York, NY.
Rosch, E. (1978), “Principles of Categorization”, in Rosch, E. and Lloyd B.#B. (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Wilber, K. (1996), The Atman Project: A Transpersonal View of Human Development, Quest Books, Wheaton, IL.
Foerster, FI. (1960), “On self-organizing systems and their environments”, in Yovits, M.#C. and Cameron, S. (eds.), Self-Organizing Systems, Pergamon Press, NY, pp. 31–50.
Wittgenstein, L. (1921), “Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung”, Annalen der Naturphilosophie, vol. 14, pp. 185–262.
Kauffman, S. (1993), The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
McCall, S. (1999), “Can a Turing Machine Know that the Gödel Sentence is True?”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 525–532.
Pattee, H. H. (1995), “Evolving self-reference: matter, symbols, and semantic closure, Communication and Cognition”, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 12, no. 1–2, pp. 9–27.
Neumann, J. (1966), The Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata, University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL.
Spencer, Brown G. (1969), Laws of form. Allen and Unwin, London, UK.
Medina-Martins, Pedro R.; Rocha, L. (1992), “The in and the out: an evolutionary approach”, in Trappl, R. (ed.), Cybernetics and Systems Research ‘82, World Scientific Press, pp. 681–689.
Derrida, J. (1967), L’Écriture et la différence, Seuil, Paris, France.
McDorman, K. F. (2007), “Life after the symbol system metaphor”, Interaction Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 143–158.
Peirce, Ch. S. (1955), “Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs (1898)”, in Bucher, J. (ed.), Philosophical Writings of Peirce, Dover, New York, NY, pp. 98–119.
Luhmann, N. (1990), Essays on self-reference, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
Downloads
Published
2019-01-14
How to Cite
Гаспарян, Д. Э. (2019). Language as Eigenform: Semiotics in the search of a meaning. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 34(4), 474–492. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2018.402
Issue
Section
Philosophy
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
