AI and the Metaphor of the Divine

Авторы

  • Дарья Сергеевна Быльева Санкт-Петербургский политехнический университет Петра Великого, Российская федерация, 195251, Санкт-Петербург, ул. Политехническая, 29
  • Альфред Нордманн Дармштадтский технический университет, Германия, 64289, Дармштадт, Каролинплатц, 5

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.411

Аннотация

Идея Бога является одной из  самых глубоких в  человеческой культуре. Раньше она рассматривалась в основном в метафизических и этических дискуссиях, теперь стала частью дискурса в философии техники. Метафора Бога используется некоторыми авторами для представления роли искусственного интеллекта (ИИ) в современном мире. В статье исследуются четыре аспекта этой метафоры: творение, всеведение, тайна, теодицея. Творческий акт показывает сходство человека с  Богом, в  том числе и в  том смысле, что технология, являясь созданной людьми, в то же время может выйти из-под контроля творца. Способность ИИ использовать потоки данных для аналитики и прогнозирования может представляться как «всеведение» и выглядит загадочно из-за неспособности людей полностью понять работу ИИ. Дискуссия о  встраивании этики в  технологию ИИ показывает желание добавить к  всеведению и  всемогуществу еще одну черту, а  именно всеблагость. Метафора Бога применительно к  ИИ раскрывает страхи и стремления человека как в рационально-прагматическом, так и в символическом плане. Как и другие технологии, ИИ направлен на удовлетворение человеческого желания большей власти. В  то же время метафора Бога указывает на власть техники над человеком. Она раскрывает трансцендентное в  современных представлениях о технологиях и вместе с тем может внести вклад в дискуссию о том, каким должен быть технологический дизайн ИИ, поскольку роли сотрудника или коммуникатора уже приводят к размышлению о том, что ИИ устроен более совершенно.

Ключевые слова:

искусственный интеллект, ИИ, этика, технологии, метафора, Бог

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.
 

Библиографические ссылки


References

Hibbard, B. (2002), Götterdämmerung, in: Super-Intelligent Machines, Boston: Springer Science &Business Media, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0759-8_1

Barrat, J. (2013), Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of Human Era, New York: Thomas Dunes Books; Macmillan Publishers.

Russell, S. (2019), Human Compatible, London: Allen Lane.

Helbing, D. (2019), The Birth of a Digital God, in Towards Digital Enlightenment, Cham: Springer, pp. 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90869-4_9

Hibbard, B. (2002), Good God, Bad God, in: Super-Intelligent Machines, Boston: Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0759-8_8

Spatola, N. and Urbanska, K. (2020), God-like robots: the semantic overlap between representation of divine and artificial entities, AI & SOCIETY, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00902-1

Noble, D.F. (2013), The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention, New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

Coeckelbergh, M. (2022), Response: Language and robots, Technology and Language, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 147–154. https://doi.org/10.48417/technolang.2022.01.14

Austin, J.L. (2018), How to Do Things with Words, Eastford: Martino Fine Books.

Jaynes, J. (2000), The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, Boston: Mariner Books.

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2003), Metaphors we live by, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Baryshnikov, P.N. (2010), Myth and metaphor. Linguistic and philosophical approach. St. Petersburg: Aleteiia Publ. (In Russian)

Vardy, P. (2015), The puzzle of God, London, New York: Routledge.

Bennett, J. (2016), Kant’s Dialectic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (1998), Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sartre, J.-P. (2007), Existentialism is a Humanism, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

Nesterov, A.Y. (2022), Cosmos and Metacosmos in Dessauer’s Philosophy of Technology: Inventing the Environment, in: Bylieva, D. and Nordmann, A. (eds), Technology, Innovation and Creativity in Digital Society. PCSF 2021. (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 345), Cham: Springer, pp. 22–33. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89708-6_3

Heidegger, M. (1977), Letter on Humanism, in: Heidegger, M., Basic writings, New York: Harper & Row, pp. 190–242.

Hui, Y. (2022), For a Cosmotechnical Event, Foundations of Science, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09729-2

Arendt, H. (1998), The human condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ursitti, F. (2021), Promethean Shame as the Hidden Instrumentum Redemptionis Humane, Technology and Language, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 61–72. https://doi.org/10.48417/technolang.2021.04.04

Jünger, F.G. (2021), The Failure of Technology: Perfection Without Purpose, North Charleston: Independently Published. Available at: https://archive.org/stream/thefailureoftechnologybyfriedrichgeorgjunger/The Failure of Technology by Friedrich Georg Jünger_djvu.txt (accessed: 06.07.2022).

Anders, G. (2016), On Promethean Shame, in: Prometheanism: Technology, Digital Culture and Human Obsolescence, London: Rowman & Littlefield International, pp. 29–95.

Foucault, M. (1995), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Vintage Books.

Deleuze, G. (2006), Foucault, Edinburgh: A&C Black.

Foucault, M. (1994), ‘La verite et les formes juridique’ (lecture and roundtable discussion at the Pontificacal Catholic University, Rio de Janiero, 21–25 May, 1973), in: Foucault, M., Dits et Ecrits 1954–1988, vol. 2, Paris: Editions Gallimard, pp. 538–646.

Sarup, M. (1988), An Introductory Guide to Post-structuralism and Postmodernism, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Available at: https://archive.org/details/introductoryguid0000saru (accessed: 03.06.22).

Koskela, H. (2000), ‘The gaze without eyes’: video-surveillance and the changing nature of urban space, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 243–265, https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200668791096

Poster, M. (1996), Databases as Discourse; or, Electronic Interpellations, in: Lyon, D. and Zureik, E. (eds), Computers, Surveillance and Privacy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 175–192.

Graham, S., and Wood, D. (2003), Digitizing Surveillance: Categorization, Space, Inequality, Critical Social Policy, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018303023002006

Introna, L., and Wood, D. (2002), Picturing Algorithmic Surveillance: The Politics of Facial Recognition Systems, Surveillance & Society, vol. 2, no. 2/3. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v2i2/3.3373

Nellis, M. (2005), Out of this World: The Advent of the Satellite Tracking of Offenders in England and Wales, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2005.00362.x

Wood, D.M. (2007), Beyond the Panopticon? Foucault and Surveillance Studies, in: Crampton, N.J. and Elden, S. (eds), Space, Knowledge and Power, Aldershot: Ashgate , pp. 245–263.

Tran, D.A. and Krishnamachari, B. (2022), Blockchain in a nutshell. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01091 (accessed: 02.06.2022).

Kovač, M. (2020), What Can Get Wrong?, in: Judgement-Proof Robots and Artificial Intelligence, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53644-2_5

Calvano, E., Calzolari, G., Denicolò, V. and Pastorello, S. (2019), Algorithmic Pricing What Implications for Competition Policy?, Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 155–171. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11151-019-09689-3

Cozens, S. (2021), “This Will Go Down on Your Permanent Record”: Redeeming Shame in a World That Doesn’t Forget, in: Shame 4.0, Cham: Springer, pp. 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59527- 2_16

Martin, K. (2022), Surveillance and Power, in: Ethics of Data and Analytics, Auerbach: Auerbach Publications, pp. 157–160. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003278290-24

Weber, M. (2009), From Max Weber Essays in Sociology, London, New York: Routledge.

Aydin, C. and Verbeek, P.-P. (2015), Transcendence in Technology, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 291–313. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2015121742

Clarke, A.C. (2000), Profiles of the Future : An Inquiry into the Limits of the Possible, London: Orion Publishing Group.

Bailey, L.W. (2005), The Enchantments of Technology, Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

Ellul, J. (2021), The Technological Society, New York: Vintage. Available at: https://monoskop.org/images/5/55/Ellul_Jacques_The_Technological_Society.pdf (accesed 1.01.2022).

Bylieva, D., Lobatyuk, V., Kuznetsov, D. and Anosova, N. (2021), How Human Communication Influences Virtual Personal Assistants, in: Bylieva, D., Nordmann, A., Shipunova, O. and Volkova, V. (eds), Knowledge in the Information Society. PCSF 2020, CSIS 2020 (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 184), Cham: Springer, pp. 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65857-1_11

Bergen, H. (2016), ‘I’d Blush if I Could’: Digital Assistants, Disembodied Cyborgs and the Problem of Gender’, Word and Text: Journal of Literary Studies and Linguistics, vol. VI, pp. 95–113.

Fröding, B. and Peterson, M. (2021), Friendly AI, Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09556-w

Leibniz, G.W. (2010), Theodicy: Essays on the goodness of God, the freedom of man, and the origin of evil, New York: Cosimo.

Hume, D. (1990), Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, London: Penguin Classics.

Zamorev, A. and Fedyukovsky, A. (2022), The Omnibenevolence Paradox and the Education Paradox: An Amendment to G.W. Leibniz’s Theodicy, in: Technology, Innovation and Creativity in Digital Society. PCSF 2021 (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 345), Cham: Springer, pp. 113–123. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-89708-6_11

Plato (1996), Protagoras, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aurelius, M. (1998), The meditations of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rousseau, J.-J. (2019), The social contract and other later political writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Arendt, H. (1994), Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil, Westminster: Penguin Books.

Hobbes, T. (2017), Three-text edition of Thomas Hobbes’s political theory: The elements of law, De Cive and Leviathan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (2009), Kant’s idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan aim: A critical guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Floridi, L. (2022), How to Counter Moral Evil: Paideia and Nomos, Philosophy & Technology, vol. 35, no. 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00515-5

Hagendorff, T. (2020), The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines, Minds and Machines, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8

Dupuy, J.-P. (2010), The Narratology of Lay Ethics, NanoEthics. vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 153–170. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11569-010-0097-4

Davies, S.R. and Macnaghten, P. (2010), Narratives of Mastery and Resistance: Lay Ethics of Nanotechnology. NanoEthics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-010-0096-5

Wiener, N. (1989), The Human Use of Human Beings, Cambridge: Riverside Press.

Bostrom, N. (2009), Ethical Issues in Advanced Artificial Intelligence, in: Schneider, S. (ed.), Science Fiction and Philosophy: From Time Travel to Superintelligence, New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 12–17.

Hibbard, B. (2001), Super-intelligent machines. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/377025.377033

Makulin, А.V. (2020), Ethical Calculator: From Philosophical “Computational Morality” to Machine Ethics of Artificial Moral Agents, Obshchestvo: Filosofiia, Istoriia, Kul’tura, vol. 11, no. 79, pp. 18–27. (In Russian)

Zheleznov, A. (2021), Morality for Artificial Intelligence: Perspectives on Philosophical Rethinking, Logos, vol. 6, no. 145, pp. 95–122. (In Russian)

Nordmann, A. (2006), Noumenal technology: Reflections on the incredible tininess of nano, in: Nanotechnology Challenges, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, pp. 49–72. https://doi. org/10.1142/9789812773975_0004

Marx, L. (2010), Technology: The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept, Technology and Culture, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 561–577.

Yanardag, P., Cebrian, M. and Rahwan, I. (2018), NORMAN.World’s first psychopath AI.Available at: http://norman-ai.mit.edu/ (accessed: 01.07.2022).

Obadia, L. (2022), Spelling the (Digital) Spell: Talking About Magic in the Digital Revolution, Sophia, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-021-00898-6

Загрузки

Опубликован

24.12.2023

Как цитировать

Быльева, Д. С., & Нордманн, А. (2023). AI and the Metaphor of the Divine. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология, 39(4), 737–749. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.411