AI and the Metaphor of the Divine

Authors

  • Daria Bylieva Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 29, ul. Polytechnicheskaya, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russian Federation
  • Alfred Nordmann Technical University of Darmstadt, 1, Residenzschloss, Darmstadt, 64283, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.411

Abstract

The idea of God is one of the most pervasive in human culture. It used to be considered mostly in metaphysical and ethical discussions, it has become a part of the discourse in the philosophy of technology. The metaphor of God is used by some authors to represent the role of artificial intelligence in the modern world. This paper explores four aspects of the metaphor: creation, omniscience, mystery, theodicy. The creative act shows the resemblance of humans to God, also in the sense that technology created by humans can get out of the control of the creator. The ability of AI to use data flows for analytics and prediction is considered as “omniscience” which looks mysterious due to the inability of people to intellectually grasp the work of AI. The discussion about building ethics into AI technology shows a desire to add one more feature to “omniscient and omnipotent,” namely “benevolent.” The metaphor of God as applied to AI reveals human fears and aspirations both in rational-pragmatic and symbolic terms. The metaphor of God exposes notions of transcendence in modern perceptions of technology. Also it continues the discussion about what should be the technological design of AI. Whether as co-worker or as communicator it is already putting us on a path towards thinking of a subject that is constituted in a superior way.

Keywords:

AI, ethics, technology, metaphor, God

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Hibbard, B. (2002), Götterdämmerung, in: Super-Intelligent Machines, Boston: Springer Science &Business Media, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0759-8_1

Barrat, J. (2013), Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of Human Era, New York: Thomas Dunes Books; Macmillan Publishers.

Russell, S. (2019), Human Compatible, London: Allen Lane.

Helbing, D. (2019), The Birth of a Digital God, in Towards Digital Enlightenment, Cham: Springer, pp. 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90869-4_9

Hibbard, B. (2002), Good God, Bad God, in: Super-Intelligent Machines, Boston: Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0759-8_8

Spatola, N. and Urbanska, K. (2020), God-like robots: the semantic overlap between representation of divine and artificial entities, AI & SOCIETY, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00902-1

Noble, D.F. (2013), The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention, New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

Coeckelbergh, M. (2022), Response: Language and robots, Technology and Language, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 147–154. https://doi.org/10.48417/technolang.2022.01.14

Austin, J.L. (2018), How to Do Things with Words, Eastford: Martino Fine Books.

Jaynes, J. (2000), The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, Boston: Mariner Books.

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2003), Metaphors we live by, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Baryshnikov, P.N. (2010), Myth and metaphor. Linguistic and philosophical approach. St. Petersburg: Aleteiia Publ. (In Russian)

Vardy, P. (2015), The puzzle of God, London, New York: Routledge.

Bennett, J. (2016), Kant’s Dialectic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (1998), Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sartre, J.-P. (2007), Existentialism is a Humanism, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

Nesterov, A.Y. (2022), Cosmos and Metacosmos in Dessauer’s Philosophy of Technology: Inventing the Environment, in: Bylieva, D. and Nordmann, A. (eds), Technology, Innovation and Creativity in Digital Society. PCSF 2021. (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 345), Cham: Springer, pp. 22–33. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89708-6_3

Heidegger, M. (1977), Letter on Humanism, in: Heidegger, M., Basic writings, New York: Harper & Row, pp. 190–242.

Hui, Y. (2022), For a Cosmotechnical Event, Foundations of Science, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09729-2

Arendt, H. (1998), The human condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ursitti, F. (2021), Promethean Shame as the Hidden Instrumentum Redemptionis Humane, Technology and Language, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 61–72. https://doi.org/10.48417/technolang.2021.04.04

Jünger, F.G. (2021), The Failure of Technology: Perfection Without Purpose, North Charleston: Independently Published. Available at: https://archive.org/stream/thefailureoftechnologybyfriedrichgeorgjunger/The Failure of Technology by Friedrich Georg Jünger_djvu.txt (accessed: 06.07.2022).

Anders, G. (2016), On Promethean Shame, in: Prometheanism: Technology, Digital Culture and Human Obsolescence, London: Rowman & Littlefield International, pp. 29–95.

Foucault, M. (1995), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Vintage Books.

Deleuze, G. (2006), Foucault, Edinburgh: A&C Black.

Foucault, M. (1994), ‘La verite et les formes juridique’ (lecture and roundtable discussion at the Pontificacal Catholic University, Rio de Janiero, 21–25 May, 1973), in: Foucault, M., Dits et Ecrits 1954–1988, vol. 2, Paris: Editions Gallimard, pp. 538–646.

Sarup, M. (1988), An Introductory Guide to Post-structuralism and Postmodernism, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Available at: https://archive.org/details/introductoryguid0000saru (accessed: 03.06.22).

Koskela, H. (2000), ‘The gaze without eyes’: video-surveillance and the changing nature of urban space, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 243–265, https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200668791096

Poster, M. (1996), Databases as Discourse; or, Electronic Interpellations, in: Lyon, D. and Zureik, E. (eds), Computers, Surveillance and Privacy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 175–192.

Graham, S., and Wood, D. (2003), Digitizing Surveillance: Categorization, Space, Inequality, Critical Social Policy, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018303023002006

Introna, L., and Wood, D. (2002), Picturing Algorithmic Surveillance: The Politics of Facial Recognition Systems, Surveillance & Society, vol. 2, no. 2/3. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v2i2/3.3373

Nellis, M. (2005), Out of this World: The Advent of the Satellite Tracking of Offenders in England and Wales, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2005.00362.x

Wood, D.M. (2007), Beyond the Panopticon? Foucault and Surveillance Studies, in: Crampton, N.J. and Elden, S. (eds), Space, Knowledge and Power, Aldershot: Ashgate , pp. 245–263.

Tran, D.A. and Krishnamachari, B. (2022), Blockchain in a nutshell. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01091 (accessed: 02.06.2022).

Kovač, M. (2020), What Can Get Wrong?, in: Judgement-Proof Robots and Artificial Intelligence, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53644-2_5

Calvano, E., Calzolari, G., Denicolò, V. and Pastorello, S. (2019), Algorithmic Pricing What Implications for Competition Policy?, Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 155–171. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11151-019-09689-3

Cozens, S. (2021), “This Will Go Down on Your Permanent Record”: Redeeming Shame in a World That Doesn’t Forget, in: Shame 4.0, Cham: Springer, pp. 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59527- 2_16

Martin, K. (2022), Surveillance and Power, in: Ethics of Data and Analytics, Auerbach: Auerbach Publications, pp. 157–160. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003278290-24

Weber, M. (2009), From Max Weber Essays in Sociology, London, New York: Routledge.

Aydin, C. and Verbeek, P.-P. (2015), Transcendence in Technology, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 291–313. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2015121742

Clarke, A.C. (2000), Profiles of the Future : An Inquiry into the Limits of the Possible, London: Orion Publishing Group.

Bailey, L.W. (2005), The Enchantments of Technology, Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

Ellul, J. (2021), The Technological Society, New York: Vintage. Available at: https://monoskop.org/images/5/55/Ellul_Jacques_The_Technological_Society.pdf (accesed 1.01.2022).

Bylieva, D., Lobatyuk, V., Kuznetsov, D. and Anosova, N. (2021), How Human Communication Influences Virtual Personal Assistants, in: Bylieva, D., Nordmann, A., Shipunova, O. and Volkova, V. (eds), Knowledge in the Information Society. PCSF 2020, CSIS 2020 (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 184), Cham: Springer, pp. 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65857-1_11

Bergen, H. (2016), ‘I’d Blush if I Could’: Digital Assistants, Disembodied Cyborgs and the Problem of Gender’, Word and Text: Journal of Literary Studies and Linguistics, vol. VI, pp. 95–113.

Fröding, B. and Peterson, M. (2021), Friendly AI, Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09556-w

Leibniz, G.W. (2010), Theodicy: Essays on the goodness of God, the freedom of man, and the origin of evil, New York: Cosimo.

Hume, D. (1990), Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, London: Penguin Classics.

Zamorev, A. and Fedyukovsky, A. (2022), The Omnibenevolence Paradox and the Education Paradox: An Amendment to G.W. Leibniz’s Theodicy, in: Technology, Innovation and Creativity in Digital Society. PCSF 2021 (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 345), Cham: Springer, pp. 113–123. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-89708-6_11

Plato (1996), Protagoras, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aurelius, M. (1998), The meditations of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rousseau, J.-J. (2019), The social contract and other later political writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Arendt, H. (1994), Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil, Westminster: Penguin Books.

Hobbes, T. (2017), Three-text edition of Thomas Hobbes’s political theory: The elements of law, De Cive and Leviathan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (2009), Kant’s idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan aim: A critical guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Floridi, L. (2022), How to Counter Moral Evil: Paideia and Nomos, Philosophy & Technology, vol. 35, no. 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00515-5

Hagendorff, T. (2020), The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines, Minds and Machines, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8

Dupuy, J.-P. (2010), The Narratology of Lay Ethics, NanoEthics. vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 153–170. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11569-010-0097-4

Davies, S.R. and Macnaghten, P. (2010), Narratives of Mastery and Resistance: Lay Ethics of Nanotechnology. NanoEthics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-010-0096-5

Wiener, N. (1989), The Human Use of Human Beings, Cambridge: Riverside Press.

Bostrom, N. (2009), Ethical Issues in Advanced Artificial Intelligence, in: Schneider, S. (ed.), Science Fiction and Philosophy: From Time Travel to Superintelligence, New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 12–17.

Hibbard, B. (2001), Super-intelligent machines. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/377025.377033

Makulin, А.V. (2020), Ethical Calculator: From Philosophical “Computational Morality” to Machine Ethics of Artificial Moral Agents, Obshchestvo: Filosofiia, Istoriia, Kul’tura, vol. 11, no. 79, pp. 18–27. (In Russian)

Zheleznov, A. (2021), Morality for Artificial Intelligence: Perspectives on Philosophical Rethinking, Logos, vol. 6, no. 145, pp. 95–122. (In Russian)

Nordmann, A. (2006), Noumenal technology: Reflections on the incredible tininess of nano, in: Nanotechnology Challenges, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, pp. 49–72. https://doi. org/10.1142/9789812773975_0004

Marx, L. (2010), Technology: The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept, Technology and Culture, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 561–577.

Yanardag, P., Cebrian, M. and Rahwan, I. (2018), NORMAN.World’s first psychopath AI.Available at: http://norman-ai.mit.edu/ (accessed: 01.07.2022).

Obadia, L. (2022), Spelling the (Digital) Spell: Talking About Magic in the Digital Revolution, Sophia, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-021-00898-6

Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология. 2023. Т. 39. Вып. 4

Downloads

Published

2023-12-24

How to Cite

Bylieva, D., & Nordmann, A. (2023). AI and the Metaphor of the Divine. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 39(4), 737–749. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.411

Issue

Vol. 39 No. 4 (2023): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Cultural studies

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.