Biopolitics: Context and text of philosophy

Authors

  • Alexander G. Pogonyaylo St. Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.405

Abstract

The article focuses on the process of conceptualizing biopolitics within the framework of philosophy, which is developing in the context of modern biopolitics. The text of “biopolitical philosophy” becomes part of its own context — the real biopolitical situation, thereby changing it. In addition, it correlates with the general philosophical context of the Western philosophical tradition, namely, denying it, deconstructing, and overcoming it in different senses, which are far from being reduced to Hegel’s Aufhebung. In this manner, the text of biopolitical philosophy is integrated into the current post-metaphysics with its well-known “turns” (practical, linguistic, ethical, etc.). As a political philosophy, biopolitics is a radical rethinking of the political philosophy of modernity, caused by the collapse of the “project” of the Enlightenment and the crisis of bourgeois representative democracy. This relationship of biopolitics with philosophical classics is analyzed in the article on the example of the two most significant biopolitical concepts created by Michel Foucault and Giorgio Agamben. Agamben’s ambition is to complete what Foucault had begun; but the way he “develops” the ideas of his predecessor is at a fundamental departure from Foucault’s version of biopolitics. Despite the fact that both begin with criticism of traditional political philosophy, turning from the “essential” formulation of the question of power and government (the problem of the source of power, its legitimation and sovereignty) to the question of how power is exercised. In this context, the problem of dispositive arises. For Foucault it is a historically defined type of ruling rationality (gouvernementalité). Agamben understands dispositive as a universal structure, thanks to which the animal is “humanized” through the exclusion of “naked life”. A different understanding of dispositive gives rise to two different “archaeologies”. Foucault is wary of philosophical universalism, while Agamben is enthusiastic about immersion into “beginnings”, albeit conceivable “event-wise”.

Keywords:

biopolitics, sovereignty, dispositive, state of exclusion, life-form

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

1. Кобылин, И. И. (2011), Исток и сингулярность: Дж. Агамбен и М. Фуко о рождении биовласти, Философия и общество, № 3 (63), июль–сентябрь, с. 171–183.

2. Фуко, М. (1996), Воля к истине. По ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. Работы разных лет, сост., пер. с фр., коммент. и послесл. Табачникова, С., общ. ред. Пузырей, А., М.: Касталь.

3. Фуко, М. (2010), Рождение биополитики. Курс лекций, прочитанный в Коллеж де Франс в 1978 –1979 учебном году, пер. с фр. Дьяков, А. В., СПб.: Наука.

4. Кильдюшов, О. (2014), Мишель Фуко как исследователь «полицейского государства»: программа, эвристические проблемы, перспективы изучения, Социологическое обозрение, т. 13, № 3, с. 9–32.

5. Фуко, М. (2011), Безопасность, территория, население. Курс лекций, прочитанный в Коллеж де Франс в 1977–1978 учебном году, пер. с фр. Быстров, В. Ю., Суслов, Н. В. и Шестаков, А. В., СПб.: Наука.

6. Семяновская, Е. С. (2013), Соотношение концептов «знание» и «власть» в философских исследованиях Мишеля Фуко, Фундаментальная наука вузам, № 3, с. 258–265.

7. Фуко, М. (2004), Археология знания, пер. с фр. Ракова, М. Б., СПб.: Гуманитарная академия.

8. Фуко, М. (2002), Интеллектуалы и власть, ч. 1: Статьи и интервью 1974–1984, пер. с фр. Офертас, С. Ч., общ. ред. Визгин, В. П. и Скуратов, Б. М., М.: Праксис.

9. Агамбен, Дж. (2018), Царство и Слава. К теологической генеалогии экономики и управления, пер. с итал. Фарафонова, Д. С. (гл. 1–8), Смагина, Е. (приложение); науч. ред. Расков, Д. Е., Погребняк, А. А. и Фарафонова, Д. С., М.; СПб.: Изд-во Института Гайдара; Факультет свободных искусств и наук СПбГУ.

10. Фуко, М. (2011), Управление собой и другими. Курс лекций, прочитанный в Коллеж де Франс в 1982–1983 учебном году, пер. с фр. Дьяков, А. В., СПб.: Наука.

11. Фуко, М. (2004), История удовольствий. История сексуальности, т. 2, пер. с фр. Каплун, В., СПб.: Академический проект.

12. Фуко, М. (2007), Герменевтика субъекта. Курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1981–1982 учебном году, пер. с фр. Погоняйло, А. Г., СПб.: Наука.

13. Агамбен, Дж. (2011), Форма жизни, Художественный журнал, № 81. URL: moskowartmagazine.com/issue/16/article/217 (дата обращения: 12.08.2020).

14. Агамбен, Дж. (2011), Homo sacer. Суверенная власть и голая жизнь, пер. с итал. Левина, И., Дубицкая, О., Соколова П. и др., М.: Европа.

15. Агамбен, Дж. (2012), Что такое диспозитив?, в Агамбен, Дж. Что современно?, Киев: Дух i Лiтера, с. 13–44.

16. Корецкая, М. А. (2019), Амбивалентность власти: мифология, онтология, праксис, СПб.: Алетейа.

17. Agamben, G. (2005), State of Exception, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

References

1. Kobylin, I. I. (2011), Origin and Singularity: J. Agamben and M. Foucault on the Birth of Biopower,Filosofiia i obshchestvo, no. 3 (63), pp. 171–183. (In Russian)

2. Foucault, M. (1960), Will to Truth. Beyond knowledge, power and sexuality. Works of different years, ed. by Puzyreya, A., transl. by Tabachnikov, S., Moscow: Kastal’ Publ. (In Russian)

3. Foucault, M. (2010), The birth of biopolitics. A course of lectures given at the College de France in the 1978–1979 academic year, transl. by D’yakov, A. V., St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

4. Kil’dyushov, O. (2014), Michel Foucault as a researcher of the “police state”: program, heuristic problems, research prospects, Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 9–32. (In Russian)

5. Foucault, M. (2011), Security, territory, population. A course of lectures given at the Collège de France in the 1977–1978 academic year, transl. by Bystrov, V. Yu., Suslov, N. V. and Shestakov, A. V., St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

6. Semyanovskaya, E. S. (2013), The relationship between the concepts “knowledge” and “power” in the philosophical studies of Michel Foucault, Fundamental’naia nauka vuzam, no. 3, pp. 258–265. (In Russian)

7. Foucault, M. (2004), Archeology of knowledge, transl. by Rakova, M. B., St. Petersburg: Gumanitarnaia akademiia Publ. (In Russian)

8. Foucault, M. (2002), Intellectuals and Power, Part. 1. Articles and interviews 1974–1984, ed. by Vizgina, V. P. and Skuratova, B. M., transl. by Ofertas, S. Ch., Moscow: Praksis Publ. (In Russian)

9. Agamben, G. (2018), Kingdom and Glory. Towards a theological genealogy of economics and management, transl. by Farafonova, D. and Smagina, E., Raskov, D. E. (sient. ed.), Pogrebnyak, A. A. and Farafonova, D. S. (eds), Moscow, St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Instituta Gaidara Publ.; Fakul’tet svobodnyh iskusstv i nauk SPbGU Publ. (In Russian)

10. Foucault, M. (2011), Controlling yourself and others. A course of lectures given at the College de France in the 1982–1983 academic year, transl. by D’yakov, A. V., St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

11. Foucault, M. (2004), A history of pleasure. The history of sexuality, vol. 2, transl. by Kaplun, V., St. Petersburg: Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian)

12. Foucault, M. (2007), Hermeneutics of the subject: A course of lectures given at the College de France in the academic year 1981–1982, transl. by Pogonyajlo, A. G., St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

13. Agamben, G. (2011), Life form, Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal, no. 81. Available at: moskowartmagazine.com/issue/16/article/217 (accessed: 12.08.2020). (In Russian)

14. Agamben, G. (2011), Homo sacer. Sovereign power and naked life, transl. by Levina, I., Dubickaja, O., Sokolov, P. et al., Moscow: Evropa Publ. (In Russian)

15. Agamben, G. (2012), What is a disposition?, in Agamben, G., Chto sovremenno?, ed. by Sokolovski, A., Kiev: Duh i Litera Publ., pp. 13–44. (In Russian)

16. Koreckaya, M. A. (2019), The ambivalence of power: mythology, ontology, praxis, St. Petersburg: Aleteia Publ. (In Russian)

17. Agamben, G. (2005), State of Exception, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

Pogonyaylo, A. G. (2020). Biopolitics: Context and text of philosophy. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 36(4),  657–674. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.405