The invention of reality

Authors

  • Viktor S. Levytskyy Ukrainian Institute of Strategies of Global Development and Adaptation, 6, Round-point Schuman, Brussel, 1040, Belgium

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.305

Abstract

The subject of the article is the process of forming ideas about the world as reality, which is most accurately described by the word “invention”. The author, relying on classical texts in this respect (E. Husserl, M. Heidegger) and modern studies (A. Makushinsky, J.-F. Kurtin) substantiates the position according to which the idea of reality is not a cultural invariant. The notion that reality has always existed, and thanks to scientific reason has been most adequately reflected, understood and described, is a significant modernization. This has been evidenced by both the etymology of the concepts of “reality” and “reality”, which first appeared only in scholasticism (D. Scotus, M. Eckhart), and the process of their content filling, which is inextricably linked with the formation of scientific rationality. The article shows that both the scientific mind and the integral image of the world created by it, which we call reality, genetically date back to the Christian value-semantic universe. Initially, it was within the framework of the discourse of natural theology that the image of the autonomous world has been conceptualized, developing according to the universal principles established by God. In the first scientific programs (R. Descartes, G. Galilei, I. Newton), these ideas were continued, as a result of which the world began to be understood as an immanent reality that is subject to the laws of nature. The new ontological beliefs received the ultimate philosophical foundation in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, to whom the phenomenal world exhausts the reality available to man. Accordingly, the world turns into a one-dimensional detranscendentalized reality. This methodological approach allows the author to make the following conclusions: 1) the image of world “reality” is a rather modern “invention”, which was unknown in previous eras; 2) at the same time, it is genetically connected with the Christian semantic universe, outside of which it could not appear; 3) the world in it is understood as a one-dimensional immanent reality.

Keywords:

reality, existence, world, scientific reasoning, Christianity, natural theology, modernity

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Habermas, J. (2003), Truth and Justification, edited and with translations by Barbara Fulmer, MIT Press.

Ferraris, M. (2014), Manifesto of New Realism, New York: Suny.

Origgi, G. (2016), What’s New About ‘New Realism’? Available at: http://berlinbooks.org/brb/2016/10/whats-new-about-new-realism/ (accessed: 10.02.2021)

Habermas, J. (2019,) Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie. Bd. 1: Die okzidentale Konstellation von Glauben und Wissen, Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Heidegger, M. (1977), The Age of the World Picture, The Question Concerning Technology, New York, London, Toronto and Sydney: Harper Perennial, pp. 115–155.

Cassin, B. (ed.) (2011), Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon, vol. 2, Kiev: DUKh І LІTERA Publ. (In Ukrainian)

Makushinski, A. (2011), The Modern “Image of the World”: Existence, Near the Pyramid, Moscow: Novyy khronograf Publ., pp. 266–303. (In Russian)

Gaidenko, P. P. (2003), Scientific Rationality and Philosophical Reason, Moscow: Progress-Traditsiia Publ. (In Russian)

Cassirer, E. (2015), Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, vol. 3: The Phenomenology of Knowledge, Moscow and St Petersburg: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ Publ. (In Russian)

Petrov, M. K. (2004), Language, Sign, Culture, Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ. (In Russian)

Akhutin, A. V. (1988), Definition of Nature in Antiquity and Modernity. «Physis» and «Natura», Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

Gilson, É. (2000) Thomism. An Introduction to the Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas, Moscow, St. Petersburg: Universitetskaia kniga Publ. (In Russian)

Stepin, V. S. (1994), Change of Methodological Paradigms, in Hubner, K. Critique of the Scientific Reason, Moscow: IF RAN Publ., pp. 7–21. (In Russian).

Newton, I. (1989), Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Belokobyl’skii, A. V. (2008), Fundamentals and Strategies of Rationality of Modern, Kiev: PARAPAN Publ. (In Russian)

Kojève, A. (1964), The Christian Origins of Modern Science. Available at: https://litresp.ru/chitat/ru/К/kozhev-aleksandr/ateizm-i-drugie-raboti/10 (accessed: 23.10.2020). (In Russian)

Husserl, E. (1994), Philosophy as a Strict Science, Novocherkassk: Saguna Publ. (In Russian)

Nicolaus Copernicus (1543), On The Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres. Available at: https://bertie.ccsu.edu/naturesci/Cosmology/Copernicus.html (accessed: 09.10.2020).

Descartes, R. (1989), Works in Two Volumes, vol. 1, Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Koyré A. (1957), From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe, Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins Press.

Bruno, G. (1949), On the Infinite Universe and Worlds, in Bruno, G., Dialogs, Moscow: Gospolitizdat Publ., pp. 295–448. (In Russian)

Galilei, G. (1964), Selected Works, in 2 vols., vol. 1, Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Berger, P. L. (2019), The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion, Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ. (In Russian)

Kant, I. (1998), Critique of Pure Reason, Minsk: Literatura Publ. (In Russian)

Kant, I. (1965), Works in 6 Volumes, vol. 4. part 1, Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Huebner, K. (1994), Critique of the Scientific Reason, Moscow: IF RAN Publ. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2021-10-22

How to Cite

Levytskyy, V. S. . (2021). The invention of reality. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 37(3), 428–440. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.305