Orestes and Electra’s Prayer Practices as Instructions to the City

Authors

  • Victoria K. Pichugina HSE University, 20, ul. Myasnitskaya, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.413

Abstract

The plot of Orestes and Electra, jointly implementing the revenge plan for the death of their father Agamemnon, is taken as the basis of the tragedy Libation Bearers by Aeschylus and the tragedies of the same name Electra by Euripides and Sophocles. А divine will and human desires intertwine at the key points of each of these tragedies, where the protagonists demonstrate different practices of the prayer as precepts to the city, which has to accept and justify the crime they are plotting. Orestes and Electra’s prayer practices in Aeschylus, Euripides and Sophocles will be analyzed according to the following questions: To whom do Orestes and Electra pray and why? Have their prayers been heard? What events precede the prayers? In which spaces of the city are the key prayers pronounced and what is the role of the chorus in it? What has the city been instructed to do through these prayers? Both Orestes and Electra assert their right to precept and seek support from the gods as the supreme preceptors in different spatial coordinates of the city. Theу view the city not only as a space where prayers are pronounced, but as another main character that can speak, for example, through the chorus lines or give tacit instructions through allusions to the details which appear in urban space descriptions. Not only does the city hear the prayers pronounced by the heroes, but it can give additional power for their materialization. For the protagonists, the city is as an open/closed space of crime and punishment, where they could and should claim new statuses of the ruler-mentors.

Keywords:

prayer practices, city space, Orestes, Electra, ancient intellectual tradition

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References


References

Beck, R.H. (1975), Aeschylus: playwright educator, The Hague: M.Nijhoff.

Cribiore, R. (2001), The Grammarian’s Choice: the Popularity of Euripides’ Phoenissae in Hellenistic and Roman Education, in: Too, Y.L. (ed.), Education in Greek and Roman antiquity, Leiden, Boston, Koln: Brill, pp. 241–259.

Rogers, B.M. (2013), Why Didaskalia? The Language of Production in (and its Many Meanings) Greek Drama, Didaskalia, vol. 10, pp. 62–69.

Dillon, J. (2016), The Platonic Philosopher at Prayer, in: Dillon, J. and Timotin, A. (eds), Platonic Theories of Prayer, Leiden, Boston: Brill, pp. 7–25.

Wheeler, G. (2003), Gender and Transgression in Sophocles’ Electra, Classical Quarterly, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 377–388.

Smith, C. S. (1990), The Meanings of Καιρόϛ in Sophocles’ Electra, Classical Journal, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 341–343.

Arnott, W.G. (1981), Double the Vision: A Reading of Euripides’ Electra, Grecce and Rome, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 179–192.

Finglass, P. J. (2005), Is There a Polis in Sophocles’ “Electra?”, Phoenix, vol. 59, no. 3/4, pp. 199–209.

Gallagher, R.L. (2003), Making the Stronger Argument the Weaker: Euripides, ‘Electra’ 518–44, Classical Quarterly, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 401–415.

Rogers, B.M. (2005), Before Paideia: Representations of Education in Aeschylean Tragedy, PhD thesis, Stanford University.

Griffith, M. (2017), The Music of War in Aeschylus’ Seven against Thebes, in: Torrance, I. (ed.), Aeschylus and War. Comparative Perspectives on Seven against Thebes, New York: Routledge, pp. 114–149.

Ewans, M. (2018), Aeschylus and Opera, in: Kennedy, R.F. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception Aeschylus, Leiden, Boston: Brill, pp. 205–224.

Nooter, S. (2017), The Mortal Voice in the Tragedies of Aeschylus, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

McClure, L. (2015), Tokens of Identity: Gender and Recognition in Greek Tragedy, Illinois Classical Studies, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 219–236.

Auer, J. (2006), The Aeschylean Electra, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, vol. 46, pp. 249–273.

Podlecki, A.J. (1983), Aeschylus’ Women, Helios, vol. 10, pp. 23–47.

Reeve, C. (2009), Luck and Virtue in Pindar, Aeschylus, and Sophocles, in: Wians, W. (ed.), Logos and Mythos. Philosophical Essays in Greek Literature, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 215–232.

Marshall, C.W. (2003), “Casting the Oresteia,” Classical Journal, vol. 98, pp. 257–274.

Kubo, M. (1967), The Norm of Myth: Euripides’ Electra, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol. 71, pp. 15–31.

O’Brien, M.J. (1964), Orestes and the Gorgon: Euripides’ Electra, American Journal of Philology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 13–39.

Roisman, H.M. and Luschnig, C.A.E. (2011), Notes and Commentary, in: Euripides’ Electra: a commentary, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, pp. 81–232.

Dunn, F.M. (1996), Tragedy’s End. Closure and Innovation in Euripidean Drama, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sheppard, J.T. (1918), The Tragedy of Electra, According to Sophocles, Classical Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 80–88.

Erp Taalman Kip, A.M. van (1996), Sophocles’ Electra 197–200: Who Is the ϑεός?, Hermes, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 282–289.

Konstan, D. (2008), Sophocles’ Electra as Political Allegory: A Suggestion, Classical Philology, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 77–80.

Grote, D.A. (1991), Electra or Chrysothemis: The Assignment of Sophocles’ Electra 428–30, Classical Journal, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 139–143.

Ierulli, M. (2004), The Poetics of Pathos: Language and Gender in Sophocles’ Electraс, PhD thesis, Ithaca: Cornell University

Liwis, V.M. (2015), Gendered Speech in Sophocles’ Electra, Phoenix, vol. 69, no. 3/4, pp. 217–241.

Shaw, M. (2001), Introduction, in: Carson, A. (trans.), Sophocles. Electra, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–40.

Kells, J.H. (ed.) (1973), Sophocles: Electra, Cambridge: University Press.

Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология. 2023. Т. 39. Вып. 4

Downloads

Published

2023-12-24

How to Cite

Pichugina, V. K. (2023). Orestes and Electra’s Prayer Practices as Instructions to the City. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 39(4), 762–775. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.413

Issue

Vol. 39 No. 4 (2023): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Cultural studies

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.