История перспективизма и статус перспективистских понятий

Michael Lewin; Vadim A. Chaly; Sergey V. Lugovoy; Leonid Yu. Kornilaev

doi:10.21638/spbu17.2023.204

Authors

Michael Lewin Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 14, ul. Aleksandra Nevskogo, Kaliningrad, 236016, Russian Federation
Vadim A. Chaly Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 14, ul. Aleksandra Nevskogo, Kaliningrad, 236016, Russian Federation
Sergey V. Lugovoy Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 14, ul. Aleksandra Nevskogo, Kaliningrad, 236016, Russian Federation
Leonid Yu. Kornilaev Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, 14, ul. Aleksandra Nevskogo, Kaliningrad, 236016, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.204

Abstract

In recent decades, Perspectivism has developed into an epistemological research program claiming its independence. This autonomy stems from Perspectivism’s potential ability to resolve the contradictions between realist and constructivist programs. Perspectivism is based on the idea that the object depends on perspective, which constitutes any subjective attempt to cognize it. Perspectivists reconstruct and explain the factors involved in the formation of perspective, identifying the conditionality of epistemic acts, using concepts such as “position”, “point of view”, “view”, “angle”, “horizon”, “focus”, “picture”, “context”, “aspect”, etc. Although these concepts are part of the Perspectivist’s toolkit, their meanings and interrelation have so far been taken for granted and have not yet been critically and comprehensively analyzed. The purpose of this article is to take steps toward clarifying the conceptual basis for defending Perspectivism as an epistemological program. Once consistently uncovered and correlated in a conceptual model, Perspectivist concepts can be used as a tool for a detailed analysis of theories, positions, and beliefs. The article begins with a preliminary description of the concept of Perspectivism and its brief history as an epistemological program. In particular, the first modern attempts to outline Perspectivist epistemology are described in the works of F.Kaulbach (1990), W. Stegmaier (2008), and M.Massimi (2017, 2020). The problem of identifying the special a priori status of Perspectivist notions as a strategy for justifying the autonomy of Perspectivism is then posed. A method for demonstrating such a status, based on Kant’s transcendentalism and P. Strawson’s descriptive metaphysics, is then suggested.

Keywords:

epistemology, Perspectivism, epistemic situatedness, perspectival concepts, transcendental argument, descriptive metaphysics, a priori

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Baghramian, M. and Carter, J.A. (2021), Relativism, in: Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism/ (дата обращения: 04.06.2021).

Irlenborn, B. (2016), Relativismus, Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.

Recanati F. (2007), Perspectival Thought. A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Giere, R.N. (2006), Scientific Perspectivism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Crețu, A.-M. and Massimi, M. (eds) (2020), Knowledge from a Human Point of View, Cham: Springer Nature.

Massimi, M. (2017), Perspectivism, in: Saatsi, J. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism, New York; London: Routledge, 2017, pp. 164–175.

Massimi, M. and McCoy, C.D. (eds) (2019), Understanding Perspectivism. Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects, New York: Routledge.

Sass, H. von (Hrsg.) (2019), Perspektivismus. Neue Beiträge aus der Erkenntnistheorie, Hermeneutik und Ethik, Hamburg: Meiner.

König, G. und Kambartel, W. (1989), Perspektive, Perspektivismus, perspektivisch, in: Joachim Ritter et al. (eds), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Bd. 7. Basel: WBG, S. 363–377.

Лейбниц, Г.В. (1982), Начала природы и благодати, основанные на разуме, пер. с фр. Иванцов, Н.А., в: Лейбниц, Г.В., Сочинения: в 4 т., т. 1, М.: Мысль, 1982, с. 404–412.

Dellinger, J. (2011), Perspektive / perspektivisch / Perspektivismus, in: P. van Tongeren, G. Schank, H. Siemens (eds). Nietzsche-Wörterbuch Online, Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, URL: https://www.degruyter. com/serial/nietzwtb-b/html (дата обращения: 04.07.2022).

Gebser, J. (1949), Ursprung und Gegenwart, in: Gebser, J., Gesamtausgabe, in 8 Bde., 2. Aufl., Bd. 2–4, Schaffhausen: Novalis.

Kaulbach, Fr. (1990), Philosophie des Perspektivismus, 1. Teil: Wahrheit und Perspektive bei Kant, Hegel und Nietzsche, Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1990.

Gerhardt, V.und Herold, N. (Hrsg.), (1992). Perspektiven des Perspektivismus. Gedenkschrift für Friedrich Kaulbach, Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.

Stegmaier, W. (2008), Philosophie der Orientierung, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.

Lewin, M. (2021), Review: Perspektivismus. Neue Beiträge aus der Erkenntnistheorie, Hermeneutik und Ethik, Hg. v. Sass, H. von, Hamburg: Meiner, 2019, 287 S., Philosophische Rundschau, 2021, vol. 68, no. 1, S. 63–69.

Mead, G.H. (1938), The Philosophy of the Act, ed. by Morris, C.W. et al., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Тарасов, О.Ю. (2019), Флоренский и обратная перспектива. Из истории термина, Искусствознание, № 4, c. 26–57.

Флоренский, П.А. (2000), Обратная перспектива. Флоренский П.А. Сочинения. В 4 т. Т. 3 (1). М.: Мысль, 2000. С. 46–103.

Кимелёв, Ю.А. (1998), Философия религии: систематический очерк, М.: Nota Bene.

Кукарцева, М.А. (2009), Перспективизм, в: Касавин, И.Т. (ред.), Энциклопедия эпистемологии и философии науки, М.: Канон+; РООИ «Реабилитация», с. 695–696.

Подорога, В.А. (2010), Перспективизм, в: Степин, В.С. (ред.), Новая философская энциклопедия: в 4 т., т. 3, М.: Мысль, 2010, с. 224–225.

Lewin, M. (2021), Das System der Ideen. Zur perspektivistisch-metaphilosophischen Begründung der Vernunft im Anschluss an Kant und Fichte, Freiburg, München: Alber.

Кант, И. (2006), Критика чистого разума, пер. Лосский, Н.О; ред. Тушлинг, Б. и Мотрошилова, Н.В., в: Кант, И., Сочинения на немецком и русском языках, т. 2(1), M.: Наука.

Stern, R. (2021), “Transcendental Arguments”, in: Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2021. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/transcendental-arguments/ (дата обращения: 04.06.2021).

Russell, B. (2009), Our Knowledge of the External World: As a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy. Routledge.

Carnap, R. (2003), The Logical Structure of the World: And, Pseudoproblems in Philosophy. Open Court Publishing.

Стросон, П.Ф. (2009) Индивиды. Опыт дескриптивной метафизики, пер. с англ. Брюшинкин, В.Н. и Чалый, В.А., Калининград: изд-во РГУ им. И.Канта.

Pereboom, D. (2019), Kant’s Transcendental Arguments, in: Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2019. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/kant-transcendental/ (дата обращения: 04.06.2022).

Kitcher, P. (1980), A Priori Knowledge, The Philosophical Review, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 3–23.

Müller, J.-W. (2014), On Conceptual History, in: Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History, Oxford University Press. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199769230.003.0004 (дата обращения: 04.06.2022).

Кант, И. (2022), Венская логика, пер. с нем. Харатонова, А.М. и Крыштоп, Л.Э., ред. Круглов, А.Н., М.: Канон+ РОООИ «Реабилитация».

Beck, L.W. (1956), Kant’s Theory of Definition, The Philosophical Review, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 179–191.

References

Baghramian, M. and Carter, J.A. (2021), Relativism, in: Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism/ (accessed: 04.06.2021).

Irlenborn, B. (2016), Relativismus, Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.

Recanati F. (2007), Perspectival Thought. A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Giere, R.N. (2006), Scientific Perspectivism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Crețu, A.-M. and Massimi, M. (eds) (2020), Knowledge from a Human Point of View, Cham: Springer Nature.

Massimi, M. (2017), Perspectivism, in: Saatsi, J. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism, New York; London: Routledge, 2017, pp. 164–175.

Massimi, M. and McCoy, C.D. (eds) (2019), Understanding Perspectivism. Scientific Challenges and Methodological Prospects, New York: Routledge.

Sass, H. von (Hrsg.) (2019), Perspektivismus. Neue Beiträge aus der Erkenntnistheorie, Hermeneutik und Ethik, Hamburg: Meiner.

König, G.und Kambartel, W. (1989), Perspektive, Perspektivismus, perspektivisch, in: Joachim Ritter et al. (eds), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Bd. 7. Basel: WBG, S. 363–377.

Leibniz, G.W. (1982), Principles of Nature and Grace Based on Reason, trans. by Ivancov, N.A., in: Leibniz, G.W., Opera: in 4 vols., vol. 1, Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., pp. 404–412. (In Russian)

Dellinger, J. (2011), Perspektive / perspektivisch / Perspektivismus, in: P. van Tongeren, G. Schank, H. Siemens (eds). Nietzsche-Wörterbuch Online, Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. Available at: https://www.degruyter.com/serial/nietzwtb-b/html (accessed: 04.07.2022).

Gebser, J. (1949), Ursprung und Gegenwart, in: Gebser, J., Gesamtausgabe, in 8 Bde., 2. Aufl., Bd. 2–4, Schaffhausen: Novalis.

Kaulbach, Fr. (1990), Philosophie des Perspektivismus, 1. Teil: Wahrheit und Perspektive bei Kant, Hegel und Nietzsche, Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1990.

Gerhardt, V. und Herold, N. (Hrsg.), (1992). Perspektiven des Perspektivismus. Gedenkschrift für Friedrich Kaulbach, Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.

Stegmaier, W. (2008), Philosophie der Orientierung, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.

Lewin, M. (2021), Review: Perspektivismus. Neue Beiträge aus der Erkenntnistheorie, Hermeneutik und Ethik, Hg. v. Sass, H. von, Hamburg: Meiner, 2019, 287 S., Philosophische Rundschau, 2021, vol. 68, no. 1, S. 63–69.

Mead, G.H. (1938), The Philosophy of the Act, ed. by Morris, C.W. et al., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Tarasov, O.Ju. (2019), Florensky and reverse perspective. From the history of a term, Iskusstvoznanie, no. 4. pp. 26–57. (In Russian)

Florensky, P.A. (2000), Reverse Perspective, in: Florensky, P.A., Opera: in 4 vols., vol. 3(1), Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., pp. 46–103 pp. (In Russian)

Kimeljov, Ju.A. (1998), The Philosophy of Religion: a Systematic Essay, Moscow, Nota Bene Publ. (In Russian)

Kukarceva, M.A. (2009), Perspektivism, in: Kasavin, I.T. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and Epistemology of Science, Moscow, Kanon+ Publ.; ROOI Reabilitatsiia Publ., pp. 695–696. (In Russian)

Podoroga, V.A. (2010), Perspektivism, in: Stepin, V. S. (ed.), New Philosophical Encyclopedia in Four Volumes, vol. 3, Moscow: Mysl’, 2010, pp. 224–225. (In Russian)

Lewin, M. (2021), Das System der Ideen. Zur perspektivistisch-metaphilosophischen Begründung der Vernunft im Anschluss an Kant und Fichte, Freiburg, München: Alber.

Kant, I. (2006), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. by Losskij, N.O; ed. by Tushling, B. and Motroshilova, N.V., in: Kant, I., Opera in German and Russian, vol. 2(1), Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Stern, R. (2021), “Transcendental Arguments”, in: Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/transcendental-arguments/ (accessed: 04.06.2021).

Russell, B. (2009), Our Knowledge of the External World: As a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy. Routledge.

Carnap, R. (2003), The Logical Structure of the World: And, Pseudoproblems in Philosophy. Open Court Publishing

Strawson, P.F. (2009), Individuals. An essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, trans. by Bryushinkin, V.N. and Chaly, V.A., Kaliningrad: Kaliningrad state University Publ. (In Russian)

Pereboom, D. (2019), Kant’s Transcendental Arguments, in: Zalta, E. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/kant-transcendental/ (accessed: 04.06.2022).

Kitcher, P. (1980), A Priori Knowledge, The Philosophical Review, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 3–23.

Müller, J.-W. (2014), On Conceptual History, in: Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199769230.003.0004

Kant, I. (2022), Viennese logic, trans. by Kharitonova, A.M. and Kryshtop, L.Je., ed. by Kruglov, A.N., Moscow.: Kanon+ Publ. and ROOOI Reabilitatsiia Publ. (In Russian)

Beck, L.W. (1956), Kant’s Theory of Definition, The Philosophical Review, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 179–191.