Technical Connection: Invariants, Adaptations, Breakthroughs

Authors

  • Elena Yu. Pogorelskaia Humanitarian University, 3, ul. Zheleznodorozhnikov, Ekaterinburg, 620041, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9723-465X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2024.108

Abstract

The article deals with issues related to the features of technical existence and its influence on civilizational processes, in general. The main element of technical reality is a copy. Copying is an ideal tool for maintaining the existence of the technical world, a model for reproducing technical reality. The peculiarity of a technical ontology is determined by the logic that is built into it. The logic built into the ontology defines the specifics of technical connections. Technical copying can be represented by the logic of a standard closed ring, or the logic of the Möbius strip. The article highlights copies of the first order, embodied in utopian dreams of an ideal technological world. Copies of the second order are associated with the mass replication of goods and services, the emergence of a standardized worldview, the use of algorithms in management decisions. Simulacrum copies are artificially created viruses, the peculiarity of shadow copies is that they destroy their donor. The experiment is also considered as a technical situation, since it meets the requirements of artificiality, control, power influence, reproduction. But the peculiarity of its seriality, its type of copies is the function of turning logic. The experiments mix natural and artificial, living and non-living, as well as all modes of time. In experiments, the links of natural laws and the rings of traditions are broken, the world is moving from the ‘eternal return’ to new objects and new types of relationships. Here self-expansion of being is accomplished through the interaction of researchers, devices, information carriers, resources. The technical truth that appeared in the experiment embodies courage and creativity, thereby revealing its aspiration to the future. In copies of experiments, it is not subsidence that works, but the growth of being.

Keywords:

technical connection, technology ontology, logical basis, copy, simulacra, experiment, new being

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Гринфилд, А. (2019), Радикальные технологии: устройство повседневной жизни, М.: Издательский дом «Дело» РАНХиГС.

Витгенштейн, Л. (1994), Философские работы, ч. I, М.: Гнозис.

Руденко, Н. (2018), Больше, чем один, — меньше, чем два: понятие и методология артикуляции множества в акторно-сетевой теории, Логос, т. 28, № 5, с. 113–136.

Ерофеева, М. (2017), Акторно-сетевая теория: объектно-ориентированная социология без объектов?, Логос, т. 27, № 3, с. 83–112.

Бряник, Н.В. (2020), Концепция структурного закона и методология структурализма в неклассической науке, Вопросы философии, № 1, с. 74–84.

Бодрийяр, Ж. (2017), Симулякры и симуляция, М.: ПОСТУМ.

Делез, Ж. (2017), Марсель Пруст и знаки, пер. с фр. Соколова, Е.Г., СПб.: Алетейя. URL: https://biblioclub.ru/index.php?page=book&id=596792 (дата обращения: 20.12.2022).

Баева А. и Ханова П. (2018), Множественные тела, множественные тексты, Логос, т. 28, № 5, с. 287–298.

Лем, С. (1993), Непобедимый: роман. Рассказы, в: Лем, С., Собр. соч. в 10 т., т. 3, М.: Текст.

Марков, Б.В. (2022), Мораль и право в цифровом обществе, Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия. Конфликтология, т. 38, вып. 4, с. 512–524.

Андерсен, Х.К. (1991), Сказки, М.: Художественная литература.

Погорельская Е.Ю. и Чернов Л.С. (2021), Механизмы воспроизводства современного социального кризиса, в: Закс, Л.А. и др. (ред.), Кризисы нашего времени как вызов обществу, культуре, человеку, материалы XXIII Международной научно-практической конференции, 15–16 апреля 2021 года, Екатеринбург: Гуманитарный университет, с. 25–32.

Ло, Д. (2018), Технология и гетерогенная инженерия: случай португальской экспансии, Логос, т. 28, № 5, с. 169–202.

Ахутин, А.В. (1988), Понятие «природа» в античности и в Новое время («фюсис» и «натура»), М.: Наука.

Погорельская, Е.Ю. (2018), Техника на пути к собственной свободе, Социум и власть, № 6 (74), с. 7–15.

Мах, Э. (2003), Познание и заблуждение. Очерки по психологии исследования, М.: БИНОМ. Лаборатория знаний.

Шавиро, С. (2017), Вселенная вещей, Логос, т. 27, № 3, с. 127–152.

Латур, Б. (2013), Наука в действии следуя за учеными и инженерами внутри общества, СПб.: Изд-во Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге.

Рикер, П. (2004), Память, история, забвение, М.: Изд-во гуманитарной литературы.


References

Grinfild, A. (2019), Radical technologies: the device of everyday life, Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom “Delo” RANKhiGS Publ. (In Russian)

Vitgenshtejn, L. (1994), Philosophical works, pt. I, Moscow: Gnozis Publ. (In Russian)

Rudenko, N. (2018), More than one — less than two: the concept and methodology of the articulation of the set in actor-network theory, Logos, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 113–136. (In Russian)

Erofeeva, M. (2017), Actor-network theory: an object-oriented sociology without objects?, Logos, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 83–112. (In Russian)

Brjanik, N.V. (2020), The concept of structural law and the methodology of structuralism in nonclassical science, Voprosy filosofii, no. 1, pp. 74–84. (In Russian)

Baudrillard, J. (2017), Simulacra and simulation, Moscow: POSTUM Publ. (In Russian)

Baudrillard, G. (2017), Marcel Proust and signs, trans. from French by Sokolova, E.G., St. Petersburg: Aleteiia Publ. Avaliable at: https://biblioclub.ru/index.php?page=book&id=596792 (accessed: 20.12.2022). (In Russian)

Baeva, A. and Hanova, P. (2018), Multiple bodies, multiple texts, Logos, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 287–298.(In Russian)

Lem, S. (1993), Invincible: a novel. Stories, in: Lem, S., Collected works: in 10 vols., vol. 3, Moscow: Tekst Publ. (In Russian)

Markov, B.V. (2022), Morality and law in a digital society, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, vol. 38, iss. 4, pp. 512–524. (In Russian)

Andersen, H.K. (1991), Fairy tales, M.: Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ. (In Russian)

Pogorel’skaja, E.Ju. and Chernov, L. S. (2021), Mechanisms of reproduction of the modern social crisis, in: Zaks, L.A. et al. (eds). Krizisy nashego vremeni kak vyzov obshchestvu, kul’ture, cheloveku, materialy XXIII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, 15–16 aprelia 2021 goda, Ekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyi universitet Publ., pp. 25–32. (In Russian)

Lo, D. (2018), Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion, Logos, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 169–202. (In Russian)

Ahutin, A.V. (1988), The concept of “nature” in antiquity and in modern times (“fusis” and “nature”), Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Pogorel’skaja, E.Ju. (2018), Technology on the way to its own freedom, Sotsium i vlast’, no. 6 (74), pp. 7–15. (In Russian)

Mah, Je. (2003), Knowledge and delusion. Essays on psychology research, Moscow: BINOM. Laboratoriia znanii Publ. (In Russian)

Shaviro, S. (2017), Universe of things, Logos, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 127–152. (In Russian)

Latur, B. (2013), Science in action following scientists and engineers within society, St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge Publ. (In Russian)

Ricœur, P. (2004), Memory, history, oblivion, Moscow: Izdatel’stvo gumanitarnoi literatury Publ.(In Russian)

Published

2024-05-20

How to Cite

Pogorelskaia, E. Y. (2024). Technical Connection: Invariants, Adaptations, Breakthroughs. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 40(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2024.108