TRINITY OF MUSEUM, ARCHIVE AND LIBRARY IN THE PROJECTIVE PHILOSOPHY OF N. F. FEDOROV: MODERN INTERPRETATION

Authors

  • Елена Игоревна Полтавская Tchaikovsky Moscow State Conservatory, 13/6, Bolshaya Nikitskaya ul., Moscow, 125009, Russian Federation;

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.414

Abstract

The author presents parallels between the views of N. F. Fedorov on the trinity of the library, archive, museum and the essential similarity of these social groups. The idea of N. F. Fedorov about the museum (archive, library) as the “council of persons” is interpreted as the notion of “museum (archive, library) — a social institution”, the structure of which the author represents in the form of the system of two interacting and interdependent elements: subject of propose and subject of demand. The subject of propose is the creator (manufacturer) of some product; the subject of the demand is the consumer. The structural identity of the notions “archive”, “library”, “museum” as defined by a schematic of their content displays the basic similarity of these institutions that creates a (archival, library, museum) document that is particular only to them and provides it to the use of the public. The similarity of archives, libraries, museums determines their modern convergence and the ability to exist in a unified organizational form, denoted by a new term “lambrary”. The archival science, library science and museology, studying the communication that is carried out in the archives, libraries and museums, they can be combined in a single classification field under one name. Refs 11.

Keywords:

library, archive, muzeum, lambrary, scheme, notion

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Федоров Н. Ф. Музей его смысл и назначение // Федоров Н. Ф. Соч. / общ. ред. А. В. Гулыга вступ. ст. прим. и сост. С. Г. Семеновой. М.: Мысль 1982. С. 575–604.

Полтавская Е. И. Схематизация понятий как метод исследования: документо-коммуникаци- онный аспект. Челябинск: Челяб. гос. акад. культуры и искусств 2014. 312 с.

Шеллинг Ф. В. Й. Система трансцендентального идеализма // Шеллинг Ф. В. Й. Соч.: в 2 т. / АН СССР Ин-т философии. М.: Мысль 1989. Т. 1. С. 227–489. архив

Прянишников Н. LAMBRARY или БАМТЕКА: Библиотека включающая архив и музей // 60 па- раллель / 60 parallel. 2009. № 1 (32). С. 28–37.

Берестова Т. Ф. Статус наук документально-коммуникационного цикла в общей системе зна- ний: Материалы круглого стола // Библиотековедение. 2007. № 1. C. 29–31.

Дворкина М. Я. Обслуживание пользователей в библиотеках музеях и архивах: общие и от- личительные черты // Электронные библиотеки. 2002. Т. 5 вып. 4. URL: http://www.elbib.ru/index.phtml?page=elbib/rus/journal/2002/part4/dvorkina (дата обращения: 02.02.2017).

Дискуссия вызвана взаимным интересом / М. Д. Афанасьев Т. М. Горяева З. А. Силаева и др. // Отечественные архивы. 2004. № 6. C. 75–86.

Майстрович Т. В. Библиотеки архивы музеи: понятийный ряд // Библиотековедение. 2000. № 3. С. 16–22.

Столяров Ю. Н. Документный ресурc. М.: Либерея-Бибинформ 2009. 224 с. (Профессиональ- ный практикум).

Столяров Ю. Н. Библиотека: структурно-функциональный подход. М.: Книга 1981. 255 с.

Общая социология: учеб. пособие / под общ. ред. А. Г. Эфендиева. М.: ИНФРА-М 2008. 654 с. (Высшее образование).

References

Fedorov N. F. Muzei ego smysl i naznachenie [The museum its meaning and purpose]. Fedorov N. F. Sochineniia [Works]. Ed. by A. V. Gulyga; Intr. art. notes and comp. S. G. Semyonova. Moscow Mysl’ Publ. 1982. 711 p. (In Russian)

Poltavskaya E. I. Skhematizatsiia poniatii kak metod issledovaniia: dokumento-kommunikatsionnyi aspekt [Schematization of notions as a method of research: a document and communication aspect]. Cheliabinsk: Chelyabinsk. State. Acad. Culture and arts 2014. 312 p. (In Russian)

Schelling F. W. J. Sistema transtsendental’nogo idealizma [System of Transcendental Idealism]. Schelling F. W. J. Sochineniia [Works in 2 vol.] Moscow Mysl’ Publ. vol. 1 pp. 227–489. (In Russian) архив

Prianishnikov N. LAMBRARY ili BAMTEKA: Biblioteka vkliuchaiushchaia arkhiv i muzei [LAMBRARY or BAMTEKA: Library comprising Archive and Museum]. 60 parallel’2009 no. 1 (32) pp. 28−37. (In Russian)

Berestova T. F. Status nauk dokumental’no-kommunikatsionnogo tsikla v obshchei sisteme znanii. Materialy «kruglogo stola» [The status of the sciences of the documentary and communication cycle in the general system of knowledge (materials of the «round table»)]. Bibliotekovedenie2007 no. 1 pp. 29−31. (In Russian)

Dvorkina M. Ia. Obsluzhivanie pol’zovatelei v bibliotekakh muzeiakh i arkhivakh: obshchie i otlichitel’nye cherty [Service by users in libraries museums and archives: common and distinctive features]. Elektronnye biblioteki2002 vol. 5 is. 4. Available at: http://www.elbib.ru/index.phtml?page=elbib/rus/ journal/2002/part4/dvorkina (accessed: 02.02.2017). (In Russian)

Diskussiia vyzvana vzaimnym interesom [The discussion is caused by mutual interest] M. D. Afanasyev T. M. Goryaeva Z. A. Silaeva et al. Otechestvennye arkhivy2004 no. 6 pp. 75−86. (In Russian)

Maistrovich T. V. Biblioteki arkhivy muzei: poniatiinyi riad [Libraries archives museums: a conceptual series]. Bibliotekovedenie2000 no. 3 pp. 16−22. (In Russian)

Stoliarov Iu. N. Dokumentnyi resurs [Document resource]. Mosocw Libereia-Bibinform Publ.2009 pp. 73−155. (In Russian)

Stoliarov Iu. N. Biblioteka: strukturno-funktsional’nyi podkhod [Library: structural and functional approach]. Moscow Kniga Publ. 1981. 255 p. (In Russian)

Obshchaia sotsiologiia: uchebnoe posobie [General sociology: tutorial]. Ed. by A. G. Efendiev. Moscow INFRA-M Publ. 2008. 654 p. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2018-10-03

How to Cite

Полтавская, Е. И. (2018). TRINITY OF MUSEUM, ARCHIVE AND LIBRARY IN THE PROJECTIVE PHILOSOPHY OF N. F. FEDOROV: MODERN INTERPRETATION. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 33(4), 563–570. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.414

Issue

Vol. 33 No. 4 (2017): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Cultural studies

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.