Does historical epistemology imply historical ontology?

Authors

  • Ольга Евгеньевна Столярова Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, 12, str. 1, Goncharnaya ul., Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.305

Abstract

The article problematizes the relationship between historical epistemology, which is now recognized as a new wave of epistemological studies, and ontology. Does historical epistemology imply any kind of ontology? Could historical meta-epistemology refer to historical ontology? What is the subject matter of historical ontology? Can this proposed historical ontology be suggested by natural science? If historical epistemology is still a project, then all these questions become even more vital. It is known that the Kantian transcendental justification of science was unhistorical. The transcendental method was based on the examples of a priori knowledge, derived from classical mechanics, which served as an expression of absolute and timeless objectivity. However, the scientific revolution of the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th centuries initiated such epistemological problems that could not be satisfactorily resolved in terms of the Kantian transcendental philosophy. It turned out that the a priori principles underlying the transcendental method can be revised in the history of science. This discovery has resulted in historicization of epistemology which now deals with unstable and historically changeable knowledge. It is argued that the most important problem for historical epistemology is the problem of transition from one system of knowledge and their constitutive principles to another, a gap between them instead of their consistency. But is it possible to find an ontological analog of this transition? The thesis is defended that historical epistemologists if they want to hold a traditional connection to natural sciences, should clarify their attitude toward historical ontology by clarifying the scientific character of the latter.

Keywords:

historical epistemology, historical ontology, philosophy of science, history of science, transcendental method, objectivity, realism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература/References

Кант И. Пролегомены ко всякой будущей метафизике, могущей появиться как наука // Кант И. Собр. соч.: в 4 т. М.: Мысль, 1965. Т. 4, ч. 1. С. 67–310.

Stroud B. The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism. Oxford University Press, 1984. 294 p.

Friedman M. Kant, Kuhn, and the Rationality of Science // History of Philosophy of Science: New Trends and Perspectives / ed. by M. Heidelberger and F. Stadler. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B. V., 2002. P. 25–41.

Гуссерль Э. Кризис европейского человечества и философия // Гуссерль Э. Философия как строгая наука. Новочеркасск: Сагуна, 1994. С. 102–126.

Касавин И. Т. Эпистемология и историческое сознание // Эпистемология & философия науки. 2005. Т. III, № 1. С. 5–14.

Quine W. V. Epistemology Naturalized // Quine W. V. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press, 1969. P. 69–90.

Galison P. Ten Problems in History and Philosophy of Science // Isis. 2008. Vol. 99. P. 111–124.

Коген Г. Теория опыта Канта. М.: Академический проект, 2012. 618 с.

Пуанкаре А. Последние мысли // Пуанкаре А. О науке. М.: Наука, 1990. С. 523–672.

Бунге М. Причинность: Место принципа причинности в современной науке. М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2010. 512 с.

Bachelard G. La philosophie du non: essai d’une philosophie du nouvel esprit scientifique. Paris: Les Presses universitaires de France, 1966. 147 p.

Визгин В. П. Эпистемология Гастона Башляра и история науки. М.: ИФ РАН, 1996. 263 с.

Hacking I. Historical Ontology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002. 288 p.

Гавриленко С. М. Историческая эпистемология: Зона неопределенности и пространство теоретического воображения // Эпистемология & философия науки. 2017. Т. 52, № 2. С. 20–28.

Шиповалова Л. В. Стоит ли науку мыслить исторически? // Эпистемология & философиянауки. 2017. Т. 51, № 1. С. 18–28.

References

Kant I. Prolegomeny ko vsiakoi budushchei metafizike, mogushchei poiavit’sia kak nauka [Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können], Kant I. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works] , in 4 vols. Vol. 4, pt. 1. Moscow, Mysl’, 1965, pp. 67–310. (In Russian)

Stroud B. The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1984. 294 p.

Friedma M. Kant, Kuhn, and the Rationality of Science. M. Heidelberger and F. Stadler, eds. History of Philosophy of Science: New Trends and Perspectives. Dordrecht, Springer Science+Business Media B. V., 2002, pp. 25–41.

Husserl E. Krizis evropeiskogo chelovechestva i filosofiia [Die Krisis Der europäischen Menschheit und die Philosophie]. Husserl E. Filosofiia kak strogaia nauka [Philosophy as Rigorous Science] . Novocherkassk, Saguna, 1994, pp. 102–126. (In Russian)

Kasavin I. T. Epistemologiia i istoricheskoe soznanie [Epistemology and Historical Consciousness]. Epistemologiia & filosofiia nauki, 2005, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5–14. (In Russian)

Quine W. V. Epistemology Naturalized. Quine W. V. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York, Columbia University Press, 1969, pp. 69–90.

Galison P. Ten Problems in History and Philosophy of Science. Isis, 2008, vol. 99, pp. 111–124.

Cohen G. Teoriia opyta Kanta [Kants Theorie der Erfahrung] . Moscow, Akademicheskij proekt, 2012. 618 p. (In Russian)

Poincaré H. Poslednie mysli [Dernières pensées]. Poincaré H. O nauke [About Science] . Moscow, Nauka, 1990, pp. 523–672. (In Russian)

Bunge M. Prichinnost’: Mesto printsipa prichinnosti v sovremennoi nauke [Causality: The Place of the Causal Principle in Modern Science] . Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2010. 512 p. (In Russian)

Bachelard G. La philosophie du non: essai d’une philosophie du nouvel esprit scientifique. Paris, Les Presses universitaires de France, 1966. 147 p.

Vizgin V. P. Epistemologiia Gastona Bashliara i istoriia nauki [Gaston Bachelard’s Epistemology and History of Science] . Moscow, IF RAN, 1996. 263 p. (In Russian)

Hacking I. Historical Ontology. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, MA, 2002. 288 p.

Gavrilenko S. M. Istoricheskaia epistemologiia: Zona neopredelennosti i prostranstvo teoretichesk¬ogo voobrazheniia [Historical Epistemology: Zone of Uncertainty and Space for Theoretical Imagination]. Epistemologiia & filosofiia nauki, 2017, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 20–28. (In Russian)

Shipovalova L. V. Stoit li nauku myslit’ istoricheski? [Should We Conceive Science Historically?]. Epistemologiia & filosofiia nauki, 2017, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 18–28. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2018-12-07

How to Cite

Столярова, О. Е. (2018). Does historical epistemology imply historical ontology?. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 34(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.305

Issue

Vol. 34 No. 3 (2018): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.