The nature of conflict: Ontological paradox and existential effort of acceptance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.407Abstract
This paper investigates the fundamental nature of conflict within an existential-phenomenological approach. Despite extensive research having been carried out on the phenomenon of conflict, little attention has been paid to its correlation with the ontological paradox. In this context, the present paper attempts to locate a uniform ground for an understanding of the entity of conflict by means of rethinking the specific position of man within Being. This becomes possible through the unfolding of a complex existential-phenomenological methodology consisting of a description of participants experiencing the paradoxical nature of conflict. Conflict is sure to consist of an encounter between opposites, incompatibilities or contradicting parties. However, where do these opposites originate and where are these contradicting parties located? The search for answers reveals that ignoring (avoidance) an understanding of the situation, as well as a rush to an immediate resolution of the conflict, appears to be unproductive. One of the possible solutions might be found within the ontological paradox in terms of phenomenological attentive consideration and existential effort for accepting the insolvability of a conflict. Nevertheless, this way reveals a paradoxical path for productively dealing with the nature of human conflict, allowing a thorough understanding in the categories of finitude, entirety, “inner war,” self-state and effort of acceptance. This complex approach may be further applied within both philosophical and sociopolitical research areas based on the represented categories. For example, investigations of such phenomena as crisis, habit, change, innovation, etc., are of great interest in terms of harmonisation of self-state and effort for acceptance.
Keywords:
conflict, nature of conflict, existential-phenomenological approach, ontological paradox, effort of acceptance
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
References
1. Jenkins, R. (2000), “The Limits of Identity: Ethnicity, Conflict, and Politics”, Sheffield Online Papers in Social Research, no. 2, available at: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.71447!/file/2jenkins.pdf (accessed: 06.08.2018).
2. Feldman, D. L. (2003), Conflict Diamonds, International Trade Regulation, and the Nature of Law, available at: http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jil/vol24/iss4/1 (accessed: 15.08.2016).
3. Oduro-Frimpong, J. (2007), “Semiotic silence: Its use as a conflictmanagement strategy in intimate relationships”, Semiotica, vol. 167, pp. 283–308.
4. Mitchel, A. (2009), “Conflict-in-Transformation: Ethics, Phenomenology and the Critique of the ‘Liberalising’ Peace”, International Peacekeeping. Special Issue: Liberal Peacebuilding Reconstructed, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 667–684.
5. Aleinikov, A. V., Gazimagomedov, G. G. and Strebkov, A. I. (2017), “‘Surgery’ and ‘Therapy’ of Corruption: The Conflict Studies Dimension”, Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict studies, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 528–540. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.411
6. Thucydides (1956), History of the Peloponnesian War in Four Volumes, vol. I, William Heinemann Publ., London.
7. Plato (1964), “First Alcibiades”, Charmides, Alcibiades I and II, Hipparchus, The Lovers, Theages, Minos, Epinomis, William Heinemann Publ., London, pp. 98–223.
8. Plato (1991), Republic, 2nd ed., Basic Books: A Division of Harper Collins Publishers.
9. Plato (1961), Laws, in 2 vols., William Heinemann Publ., London.
10. St. Augustine (1997), The Confessions, New City Press Publ., New York.
11. Abelard, P. (1995), “Ethics or ‘Know Yourself ’”, Ethical Writings, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, Cambridge, pp. 1–58.
12. Aquinas, T. (1955–1957), “Book II: Creation”, Summa contra Gentiles, Hanover House, New York.
13. Bacon, F. (2000), The New Organon, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Descartes, R. (1991), Principles of Philosophy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London.
15. Descartes, R. (1989), The Passions of the Soul, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, Cambridge.
16. Hobbes, T. (1994), Leviathan: with selected variants of the Latin edition of 1668, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis.
17. Locke, J. (1836), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, T. Tegg and Son Publ., London, UK.
18. Nietzsche, F. (2002), Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future, Cambridge University Press, New York.
19. Freud, S. (1989), New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis, Norton & Company Publ., London, New York.
20. Marcel, G. (1999), Essai de philosophie concrete, Gallimard Publ., Paris.
21. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012), Phenomenology of Perception, Routledge Publ., New York.
22. Levinas, E. (1987), Time and the Other, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh.
23. Sartre, J.-P. (1992), Being and Nothingness: A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology, Washington Square Press, New York.
24. Heidegger, M. (2003), “Overcoming of Metaphysics”, The End of Philosophy, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, pp. 84–111.
25. Foucault, M. (1966/2002), The Order Of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, Routledge Publ., London, New York.
26. Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. (2000), Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
27. Žižek, S. (2008), The Sublime Object of Ideology, Verso Publ., London, New York.
28. Badiou, A. (2006), Bodies, Languages, Truth, available at: http://www.lacan.com/badbodies.htm (accessed: 02.09.2016).
29. Kleiman, T. and Hassin, R. R. (2011), “Non-conscious Goal Conflicts”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 47, pp. 521–532.
30. Nancy, J.-L. (2000), Being Singular Plural, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
31. Rothman, J. (1997), Resolving Identity-Based Conflict: In Nations, Organisations, and Communities, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
32. Greco Morasso, S. (2008), “The ontology of Conflict”, Pragmatics & Cognition, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 540–567.
33. Galtung, J. (1973), Theories of Conflict, University of Hawai’i Press, Honolulu.
34. Heidegger, M. (1977), “Science and Reflection”, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Garland Publishing Inc., New York, London, pp. 155–182.
35. Sartre, J.-P. (2005), Existentialism is a Humanism, available at: https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/sartre/works/exist/sartre.htm (accessed: 06.08.2018).
36. Ortega y Gasset, J. (1962), History as a System and Other Essays Toward a Philosophy of History, Norton & Company Publ., New York, London.
37. Husserl, E. (1970), The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, Northwestern University Press, Evanston.
38. Bakhtin, M. M. (1999), Toward a Philosophy of the Act, University of Texas Press, Austin.
39. Kant, I. (2002), Critique of Practical Reason, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, Cambridge.
40. Pape, C. (2016), “Husserl, Bakhtin, and the Other I. Or: Mikhail M. Bakhtin — a Husserlian?”, Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 271–289.
41. Popova, N., Moiseenko, Ya., and Beavitt, T. (2017), “Conformity in Modern science: An Engine of Societal Transformation?”, Changing Societies & Personalities, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 237–258. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/csp.2017.1.3.017
42. Deleuze, G. (1990), The Logic Of Sense, The Athlone Press, London.
43. Deleuze, G. (1997), Cinema 1: The Movement-Image, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
44. Plato (1931), “Parmenides”, Dialogues of Plato in Five Volumes, vol. IV, Oxford University Press, London, pp. 1–106.
45. Aristotle (1857), Metaphysics, Henry G. Bohn Publ., London, UK.
46. Nicholas of Cusa (2001), “On Not-other”, Complete philosophical and theological treatises of Nicholas of Cusa, vol. 2, A. J. Banning Press, Minneapolis, pp. 1108–1166.
47. Kierkegaard, S. (2006), Fear and Trembling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
48. Brassier, R. (2011), “Concepts, Objects, Gems”, Theory after ‘Theory’, Routledge Publ., London, New York, pp. 278–292.
49. Mamardashvili, M. K. (1995), Lections on Proust: Psychological Topology of the Way, Ad Marginem Publ., Moscow. (In Russian).
50. Mamardashvili, M. K. and Piatigorskii, A. M. (1997), Symbol and Consciousness: Metaphysical Mediations on Consciousness, Symbolics and Language, Shkola “Iazyki russkoi kul’tury” Publ., Moscow. (In Russian).
51. Maikov, V. V. (1989), “Consciousness is Like a Paradox, to Which One Cannot Become Habituated + Interview with Merab Konstantinovich Mamardashvili”, Voprosy Filosofii, vol. 7, pp. 112–118.
52. Mamardashvili, M. K. (2010), “The Problem of Consciousness and the Philosopher’s Calling”, Russian Studies in Philosophy, vol. 49, is. 2, pp. 8–27.
53. Mamardashvili, M. K. (1992), How I Understand Philosophy, 2nd ed., Progress Publ., Moscow. (In Russian).
54. Dolzhenko, O. (2010), “How I Understand Philosophy: A Conversation with Merab Mamardashvili”, Russian Studies in Philosophy, vol. 49, is. 1, pp. 7–19.
55. Bibikhin, V. V. (2012), Property: The Philosophy of one’s own, Nauka Publ., Saint Petersburg. (In Russian).
56. Bibikhin, V. V. (1997), “One’s Own, Private Property + Economic, Ethics and Social Aspects of Market Economy in Present-day Russia”, Voprosy Filosofii, vol. 2, pp. 71–81.
57. Bibikhin, V. V. (1998), “One’s Own, Proper. What is Property in its Essence?”, Social Market Economy: Theory and Ethics of the Economic Order, pp. 115–127.
58. Bakeeva, E. V. (2009), To Accept the Paradox, or an Effort of Humility, Ural State University Press, Ekaterinburg. (In Russian).
59. Bakeeva, E. (2017), “The ontological sense of the concept of ‘Measure’”, Revista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica, no. 2, pp. 471–483.
60. Derrida, J. (2005), Writing and Difference, Routledge Publ., London, New York, UK.
61. Bakeeva, E. V. (2002), Understanding as an Existential Problem, Ural State University Press, Ekaterinburg.(In Russian).
62. Tillich, P. (1980), The Courage to Be, Yale University Press, New Haven, London.
63. Aristotle (1959), Politics, William Heinemann Publ., London.
64. Simmel, G. (1908), Der Mensch als Feind, available at: http://socio.ch/sim/verschiedenes/1907/feind.htm (accessed: 06.08.2018).
65. Bakhtin, M. M. (1990), “Author and Hero in Aesthetic Activity”, Art and Answerability, University of Texas Press, Austin, Slavic Ser., no. 9, pp. 4–256.
66. Fromm, E. (1959), Values, Psychology and Human Existence, available at: https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-Fromm/files/991/1959b-eng.pdf (accessed: 06.08.2018).
67. Fromm, E. (2008), To Have or to Be?, Continuum Publ., London, New York.
68. Heidegger, M. (1977), “The Turning”, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Garland Publishing Inc., New York, London, pp. 36–49.
69. Kierkegaard, S. (1992), Either/Or: A Fragment of Life, Penguin Classics, London.
70. Leibniz, G. W. (1898), The Monadology, English translation by Robert Latta, 1898, available at: http://home.datacomm.ch/kerguelen/monadology/monadology.html (accessed: 06.08.2018).
71. Heidegger, M. (2000), “Letter on Humanism”, Global Religious Vision, vol. I/I, pp. 83–109.
Downloads
Published
2019-12-27
How to Cite
Biricheva, E. V. (2019). The nature of conflict: Ontological paradox and existential effort of acceptance. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 35(4), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.407
Issue
Section
Conflict studies
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
