Hegel as an atheist and intuitivist in the interpretations of Alexandre Kozhève and Nikolay Lossky

Authors

  • Alexander A. Korolkov Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.101

Abstract

The Russian exiled philosophers Alexander Kozhevnikov (Alexandre Kozhève) and Nikolay Lossky, who had to leave Russia in the 1920s, gave paradoxical interpretations of Hegel’s work: Kozhève treated Hegel as an atheist whereas Lossky interpreted him as an intuitivist. Both philosophers have influenced the development of Western European philosophy and contemporary understanding of Hegel’s texts. The history of Russian philosophy would be poorer if we forget that Kozhevnikov acquired recognition as a French philosopher Kozhève only at a mature age. A strong influence on Kozhève’s treatment of Christianity was exerted by Vladimir Soloviev’s philosophy, to which he devoted his first dissertation under the guidance of Karl Jaspers. His attention to the Christian understanding of love as an endless power over the finite manifestations of spirit, which was expounded upon/revealed in his course of lectures on Hegel, enjoyed great popularity in France and influenced the formation of eminent philosophers. Hegel’s atheism in Kozhève’s interpretation is not a denial of religion, since religion and philosophy have common interests applied to eternal themes; they differ only in methods of the cognition of the Absolute. The logic of the anthropological interpretation of Hegel led Kozhève to the rationalization of religion by elevating philosophy over it. Hegel’s atheistic anthropology turned his study into a summary of religious evolution, with theology eventually ousted by anthropology. Nikolay Lossky, who had written a book on intuitivism before the revolution, in his creative work abroad extended his notion of intuitivism by calling Hegel an extreme intuitivist. He based this conclusion on Hegel’s upholding of the principle of the identity of thinking and being, that is following the logic of an object in cognition. The possibility to eliminate the contradiction between knowledge and being, about which Hegel wrote, is interpreted by Lossky as intuitivism and even empiricism.

Keywords:

Spirit, atheism, religion, God, anthropology, intuitivism, Hegel, Vladimir Solovyev

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

1. Левицкий, С. А. (1981), Очерки по истории русской философии и общественной мысли, Frankfurt am Main: Посев.

2. Кожев, А. (2003), Диалектика реального и феноменологический метод у Гегеля, в Кожев, А., Введение в чтение Гегеля, СПб.: Наука, с. 553–656.

3. Кожев, А. (2007), Религиозная метафизика Владимира Соловьева, в Кожев, А., Атеизм и другие работы, М.: Праксис, с. 175–257.

4. Руткевич, А. М. (2010), «Левое» гегельянство А. Кожева, Вопросы философии, No 10, с. 122–127.

5. Ильенков, Э. В. (1984), Диалектическая логика, М.: Мысль.

6. Кожев, А. (2003), Идея смерти в философии Гегеля (полный текст двух последних лекций из курса 1933–1934 учебного года), в Кожев, А., Введение в чтение Гегеля, СПб.: Наука, с. 657–716.

7. Кожев, А. (2003), Введение в чтение Гегеля, СПб.: Наука.

8. Спекторский, Е. В. (1932), Место Гегеля в истории философии, Записки Русского института в Белграде, вып. 7, с. 275–308.

9. Кожев, А. (2007), Атеизм и другие работы, М.: Праксис.

10. Гегель, Г. В. Ф. (1971), Философская пропедевтика, в Гегель, Г. В. Ф., Работы разных лет, т. 2, М.: Мысль, с. 6–209.

11. Гегель, Г. В. Ф. (1976), Философия религии, в 2 т., т. 2, М.: Мысль.

12. Гегель, Г. В. Ф. (1976), Философия религии, в 2 т., т. 1, М.: Мысль.

13. Ильин, И. А. (1994), Философия Гегеля как учение о конкретности Бога и человека, СПб.: Наука.

14. Чижевский, Д. И. (2007), Гегель в России, СПб.: Наука.

15. Лосский, Н. О. (1933), Гегель как интуитивист, Записки Русского научного института в Белграде, вып. 9, с. 275–289.

16. Зеньковский, В. В. (1989), История русской философии, т. 2, Париж: YMCA-Press.

17. Лосский, Н. О. (1991), Обоснование интуитивизма, в Лосский, Н. О., Избранное, М.: Правда, с. 13–334.

18. Руткевич, А. М. (2007), Предисловие, в Кожев, А., Атеизм и другие работы, М.: Праксис, с. 7–44.

References

1. Levitsky, S. A. (1981), Essays on the history of Russian philosophy and public thought, Frankfurt am Main: Posev Publ. (In Russian)

2. Kozhève, A. (2003), Dialectics of Hegel’s real and phenomenological method, in Introduction to the reading of Hegel, St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., pp. 553–656. (In Russian)

3. Kozhève, A. (2007), Religious metaphysics of Vladimir Solovyev, in Kozhève, A., Atheism and other works, Moscow: Praxis Publ., pp. 175–257. (In Russian)

4. Rutkevich, A. M. (2010), A. Kozhève’s Leftist Hegelianism, Voprosy filosofii, no. 10, pp. 122–127.

5. Ilyenkov, E. V. (1984), Dialectical logics, Moscow: Mysl Publ. (In Russian)

6. Kozhève, A. (2003), The idea of death in Hegel’s philosophy (full text of the two last lectures from the 1933–1934 academic year), in Introduction to the reading of Hegel, St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., pp. 657–716. (In Russian)

7. Kozhève, A. (2003), Introduction to the reading of Hegel, St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

8. Spektorsky, E. V. (1932), Hegel’s place in the history of philosophy, Zapiski Russkogo instituta v Belgrade, iss. 7, pp. 275–308.

9. Kozhève, A. (2007), Atheism and other works, Moscow: Praxis Publ. (In Russian)

10. Hegel, G. W. F. (1971), Philosophical propaedeutics, in Hegel, G. W., Works of different years, vol. 2, Moscow: Mysl Publ., pp. 6–209. (In Russian)

11. Hegel, G. W. F. (1976), Philosophy of religion, in 2 vols, vol. 2, Moscow: Mysl Publ. (In Russian)

12. Hegel, G. W. F. (1976), Philosophy of religion, in 2 vols, vol. 1, Moscow: Mysl Publ. (In Russian)

13. Ilyin, I. A. (1994), Hegel’s philosophy as a teaching on the concreteness of God and man, St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

14. Tschižewskij, D. I. (2007), Hegel in Russia, St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

15. Lossky, N. O. (1933), Hegel as an intuitivist, Zapiski Russkogo nauchnogo instituta v Belgrade, iss. 9, pp. 275–289.

16. Zenkovsky, V. V. (1989), History of Russian philosophy, vol. 2, Paris: YMCA-Press. (In Russian)

17. Lossky, N. O. (1991), The foundations of intuitivism, in Lossky, N. O., Selected works, Moscow: Praxis Publ., pp. 13–334. (In Russian)

18. Rutkevich, A. M. (2007), Foreword, in Kozhève, A., Atheism and other works, Moscow: Praxis Publ., pp. 7–14. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2021-03-31

How to Cite

Korolkov, A. A. (2021). Hegel as an atheist and intuitivist in the interpretations of Alexandre Kozhève and Nikolay Lossky. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 37(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.101

Issue

Vol. 37 No. 1 (2021): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.