The thinning physicality of an artifact

Authors

  • Alex D. Shorkin V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.211

Abstract

The article compares two versions of the development of cultural studies. In the first (wide) version, culture is traditionally understood as the whole artificially created “second nature”. According to the second, currently prevailing narrow version, the subject of cultural studies is the mental (ideational) aspects of cultures; the physicality of artifacts is supplanted to the periphery of research. A narrow interpretation of culture leads to a number of conceptual flaws and thematic gaps. The prospects of cultural studies are seen by the author in the advantages of a broad interpretation of culture. A model of the morphology of culture is proposed, which includes the frontier, discursive practices, and core values. Three types of artifacts form the frontier of culture on its border with the external environment (nature and other cultures): artificial things, modified organisms and social institutions. The nomenclature of discursive practices that make it possible to build a frontier includes knowledge, technology, and norms. Their historical and cultural configurations undergo significant metamorphoses. A special function of intergenerational translation of cultural achievements is performed by enculturation technologies. The values of cultures are presented, first of all, by symbols. In addition, they are transferred and rebuilt by simulacra, which are capable of performing both destructive and creative functions. Symbols promote following traditions and, simulacra — enriching or changing them. Symbols and simulacra direct the dynamics of cultures. To describe the dynamics of cultures, it is advisable to use the synergistic concept of persistent and transmutation attractors. In persistent attractors, cultures are delicately  adapted to external challenges they are accustomed to. A drastic change in challenges pushes culture into one of two transmutation attractors, where it either perishes or gets a chance to become a civilization.

Keywords:

cultural studies, artifact, discursive practices, simulacra, frontier of culture, cultural dynamics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

1. Юрчук, В. В. (1999), Современный словарь по культурологии, Минск: Современное Слово.

2. Уайт, Л. (1949), Наука о культуре, пер. Резвых, П. В., в Антология исследований культуры, т. 1: Интерпретация культуры, СПб.: Университетская книга, с. 141–156.

3. Орлова, Э. А. (2010), История антропологических учений, М.: Академический проект; Альма Матер.

4. Шулепова, Э. А. (2015), Культурология и ее исторические основания, в Историческая культурология, ред. Шулепова, Э. А., М.: Академический проект; Альма Матер, с. 5–9.

5. Flier, F. Y. (2015), Историческая культурология как область знания, в Историческая культурология, ред. Шулепова, Э. А., М.: Академический проект; Альма Матер, с. 9–18.

6. Солонин, Ю. Н. и Каган, М. С. (2007), Культурология, М.: Высшее образование.

7. Бодрийяр, Ж. (1995), Система вещей, пер. Зенкин, С. Н., М.: Рудомино.

8. Гирц, К. (1973), «Насыщенное описание»: в поисках интерпретативной теории культуры, пер. Лазарева, Е. М., в Антология исследований культуры, т. 1: Интерпретация культуры, СПб.: Университетская книга, с. 171–200.

9. Найдорф, М. И. (2005), Введение в теорию культуры: основные понятия культурологии, Одесса: Друк.

10. Тойнби, А. Дж. (1991), Постижение истории, пер. Жарков, А. Е., М.: Прогресс.

11. Уайт, Л. (1959), Понятие культуры, пер. Лазарева, Е. М., в Антология исследований культуры, т. 1: Интерпретация культуры, СПб.: Университетская книга, с. 17–48.

12. Харари, Ю. Н. (2016), Sapiens. Краткая история человечества, пер. Сумм, Л., М.: Синдбад.

References

1. Yurchuk, V. V. (1999), Modern Dictionary of Cultural Studies, Minsk: Sovremennoe Slovo Publ. (In Russian)

2. White, L. (1949,) Science of Culture, transl. by Rezvyh, P. V., in Antologiia issledovanii kul’tury, vol. 1: Interpretatsiia kul’tury, St. Petersburg: Universitetskaia kniga Publ., pp. 141–156 (In Russian)

3. Orlova, E. A. (2010), History of Anthropological Doctrines, Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ., Al’ma mater Publ. (In Russian)

4. Shulepova, E. A. (2015), Culturology and its historical foundations, in Istoricheskaia kul’turologiia, ed. by Shylepova, E. А., Мoscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ., Al’ma mater Publ., pp. 5–9.

5. Flier, A. Y. (2015), Historical Culturae Studies as a region of knowledge, in Istoricheskaia kul’turologiia, ed. by Shylepova, E. А., Мoscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ., Al’ma mater Publ., pp. 9–18.

6. Solonin, Yu. N. and Kagan, M. S. (2007), Cultural Studies: Textbook, Moscow: Vysshee obrazovanie Publ. (In Russian)

7. Baudrillard, J. (1995), System of Things, transl. by Zenkin, S. N., Moscow: Rudomino Publ. (In Russian)

8. Geertz, С. (1973), The Interpretations of Culture, transl. by Lazareva, E. M., in Antologiia issledovanii kul’tury, vol. 1: Interpretatsiia kul’tury, St. Petersburg: Universitetskaia kniga Publ., pp. 171–200. (In Russian)

9. Najdorf, M. I. (2005), Introduction to Theory of Culture: Basic Concepts of Cultural Studies, Odessa: Druk Publ. (In Russian)

10. Toynbee, A. J. (1991), A Study of History, transl. by Jarkov, A. E., Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russian)

11. White, L. A. (1959), The Concept of Culture, transl. by Lazareva, E. M., in Antologiia issledovanii kul’tury, vol. 1: Interpretatsiia kul’tury, St. Petersburg: Universitetskaia kniga Publ., pp. 17–48 (In Russian)

12. Harari, Yu. N. (2016), Sapiens. A brief history of Humankind, transl. by Summ, L., Moscow: Sindbad Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Shorkin, A. D. (2021). The thinning physicality of an artifact. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 37(2), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.211