Global values of the global world

Authors

  • Elena M. Sergeichik St. Petersburg Academy of Postgraduate Pedagogical Education, 11–13, ul. Lomonosova, St. Petersburg, 191002, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.313

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of global values, whose existence is problematized in the face of increased regionalization as a vector of world development. Regionalization is not “the end of globalization”, but its stage, which is “the revolution of plurality” (M. Naim) — distribution regularities of the network society on the whole world. The global world is not a homo geneous world of mankind based on the same values, rather the global world is a combination of diverse social communities striving for autonomy and self-determination. Building on the concepts of M. McLuhan, A. Toffler, D. Bell and N. Luhman, the article analyzes the information society in which the main element is communication as a source of social innovations. Digital technologies contribute to the development of human abilities and personal qualities without which social progress is impossible. If the vision of humanity in the development of the network society, where relations between the countries, regions, social communities and people are built on the basis of the values of life, liberty, creativity, justice, law, etc., then these values should be recognized as global. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the reaction of various social communities on regionalization, which finds its expression in the deepening of social inequality, increasing conflict of generations and other phenomena that contribute to disseminating conservative ideas and moods. Based on the works of J. Derrida, N. Luhman and D. Kean, it is shown that global values are not the achievements of exclusively European culture but are to varying degrees implemented and developed in all cultures. Against the background of the crisis of multiculturalism, the integration of cultures should be based on intercultural communication, for which the process of coordinating positions is important. The purpose of intercultural communication is not only the exchange of cultural values, but the demonstration of the benefits of life in those communities that are guided by global values.

Keywords:

global values, globalization, regionalization, communication, information society, local culture

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Дуткевич, П. и Казаринова, Д. Б. (2017), Конец эпохи глобализации: причины и последствия, Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Сер. Политология, т. 19, № 1, с. 7–14.

King, D. (2017), Grave new world: the end of globalization, the return of history, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Кондратьев, Вл. (2017), Конец глобализации, или к новому капитализму, Перспективы. Электронный журнал. URL: http://www.perspektivy.info/srez/etnos/konec_globalizacii_ili_k_novomu_kapitalizmu_2017-04-26.htm (дата обращения 03.05.2018).

Белл, Д. (1999), Грядущее постиндустриальное общество. Опыт социального прогнозирования, М.: Академия.

Луман, Н. (2009), Введение в системную теорию, М.: Логос.

Тапскотт, Д., Уильямс, Э. Д. (2009), Викиномика. Как массовое сотрудничество изменяет все, М.: BestBusinessBooks.

Маклюэн, М. (2007), Понимание Медиа: Внешние расширения человека, М.: Гиперборея, Кучково поле.

Луман, Н. (2004), Общество как социальная система, М.: Логос.

Назарчук, А. В. (2008), Сетевое общество и его философское осмысление, Вопросы философии, № 7, с. 61–75.

Наим, М. (2016) Конец власти. От залов заседаний до полей сражений, от церкви до государства: почему управлять сегодня нужно иначе, М.: АСТ.

Ламажаа, Ч. К. (2011), Архаизация общества в период социальных трансформаций, Гуманитарные науки: теория и методология, № 3, с. 35–42.

Бондаренко, Д. М. (2016), Оттенки черного. Культурно-антропологические аспекты взаимовосприятия и взаимоотношений афро-американцев и мигрантов из стран субсахарской Африки в США, М.: Фонд Развития фундаментальных лингвистических исследований.

Хантингтон, С. (2005), Столкновение цивилизаций, М.: АСТ.

Эйзенштадт, Ш. Н. (2002), Множественность модернизмов в век глобализации, Глобализация: Контуры XXI века, M.: ИНИОН РАН, ч. 1, с. 136–145.

Небольсина, Е. В. (2017), Влияние «Брексит» на доверие к научному знанию в Великобритании, Теория и практика общественного развития, № 6. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2017.6.14.

Пэлфри, Дж. и Гассер, У. (2011), Дети цифровой эры, М.: Эксмо.

Иноземцев, В. Л. (2003), Глобализация и неравенство: что — причина, что — следствие? Россия в глобальной политике, № 1, с. 158–175, URL: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/number/n_448 (дата обращения 18.04.2018).

Keane, J. (2009), The Life and Death of Democracy, W. W. Norton & Company.

Гидденс, Э. (2015), Неспокойный и могущественный континент: что ждет Европу в будущем? М.: Изд. дом «Дело» РАНХиГС.

Деррида, Ж. (2004), Глобализация, мир и космополитизм, Космополис, № 2 (8), с. 125–140.

Гибернау, М. Национальная идентичность vs космополитическая идентичность, Михаил Гефтер, URL: http://gefter.ru/archive/18531 (дата обращения: 17.01.2018).

Хабермас, Ю. (1995), Демократия Разум Нравственность, М.: Academia, KAMI, с. 32–55.


References

Dutkiewicz, P. and Kazarinova, D. B. (2017), The End of Globalization: Reasons and Consequences, Vestnik of People‘ Friendship University of Russia, Journal of Political Science, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 7–14. (In Russian)

King, D. (2017), Grave new world: the end of globalization, the return of history, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Kondratiev, Vl. (2017), The End of Globalization, or Toward to the New Capitalism, Perspectives. Online Magazine. Available at: http://www.perspektivy.info/srez/etnos/konec_globalizacii_ili_k_novomu_kapitalizmu_2017-04-26.htm (accessed: 03.05.2018). (In Russian)

Bell, D. (1999), The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting, trans. by Inozemcev, V. L., Moscow: Academy Publ. (In Russian)

Luhman, N. (2009), Introduction in Theory of Systems, transl. by Timofeev, K., Мoscow: Logos Publ. (In Russian)

Tapscott, D., Williams, A. D. (2009) Vikinomica. How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything, transl. by Mironov, P., Vasilenko, G., Мoscow: BestBusinessBooks Publ. (In Russian)

McLuhan, М. (2007), Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, transl. by Nikolaeva, V. G., Мoscow: Giperboreia Publ., Kuchkovo pole Publ. (In Russian)

Luhman, N. (2004) Society as Social Systems, trans. by Antonovsky, A., Мoscow: Logos Publ. (In Russian)

Nazarchuk, А. V. (2008), The Network Society and his Philosophical Understanding, Voprosy filosofii, no. 7, pp. 61–75. (In Russian)

Naim, M. (2016), The End of Power: From Boardrooms to Battlefields and Churches to States, Why Being In Charge Isn’t What It Used to Be, transl. by Mezin, N., Poleshchuk, Y. and Sagan, A., Мoscow: АSТ Publ. (In Russian)

Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2011), Archaization of the society in the period of social transformation, Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, no. 3, pp. 35–42. (In Russian)

Bondarenko, D. M. (2016), The Shades of Black Cultural-Antropological Aspects of Mutual Perceptions and Relations between African Americans and African Migrants in the U. S. A., Moscow: Fundamental Linguistics Development Fund Publ. (In Russian)

Huntington, S. Ph. (2005), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, transl. by Velimeev, T., Мoscow: АSТ Publ. (In Russian)

Eisenstadt S. N. (2002), Multiple Modernities in the Age of Globalization, in Globalizatia: Kontury XXI veka, Moscow: INION RAN Publ, pt. I, pp. 136–145. (In Russian)

Nebol’sina, E. V. (2017), Brexit Impact on Trust in Scientific Knowledge in UK, Teoriia i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiia, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2017.6.14 (In Russian)

Pelfrey, G. and Gasser, W. (2011), Children of Digital Age, Moscow: Eksmo Publ. (In Russian)

Inozemtsev, Vl. (2003), Globalization and Inequality: a Cause or an Effect? Rossiia v global’noi politike, no. 1, pp. 158–175. Available at: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/number/n_448 (accessed: 18.04.2018). (In Russian)

Keane, J. (2009), The Life and Death of Democracy, W. W. Norton & Company.

Giddens, A. (2015), Turbulent and Mighty Continent What Future for Europe? Мoscow: Business Publ. (In Russian)

Derrida, J. (2004), Globalization, World and Cosmopolitanism, Cosmopolis, no. 2 (8), pp. 125–140. (In Russian)

Gibernau, M., National Identity Versus Cosmopolitan Identity, Mihail Gefter. Available at: http://gefter.ru/archive/18531 (accessed: 17.01.2018). (In Russian)

Habermas, J. (2005), Democracy, Reason, Morality, Мoscow: Academia, KAMI Publ., pp. 32–55.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-26

How to Cite

Sergeichik, E. M. . (2021). Global values of the global world. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 37(3), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.313

Issue

Vol. 37 No. 3 (2021): Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология

Section

Cultural studies

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.