The problem of tradition and philosophical strategies of modernity

Authors

  • Alexey M. Sokolov St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Nikita V. Kuznetsov St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.401

Abstract

The article is devoted to the question of the correlation between the formation of philosophical methodology in the modern era and the problematization of tradition in the humanities. The authors believe that the theme of tradition was one of the starting points for the development of humanitarian knowledge and, at the same time, contributed to the methodological expansion of philosophical research. Already at the end of the 18th century, romantics, fascinated by antiquity, made attempts to rationalize the emergence of religious texts from the Middle Ages. Their predominant interest in history led to the assumption that any form of knowledge can be rationally reconstructed. However, in order to do this it was necessary to expand the factual account of each of the studied phenomena. The romantics thereby largely anticipated the research intentions of classical positivism, without turning away from the defining role of intellectual intuition, which grasps the experimental content of consciousness with a concept. All humanitarian knowledge (history, psychology, linguistics) from the second half of the 19th century developed in this direction. The authors pay special attention to W.Dilthey’s interest in the topic of tradition and the congeniality of philosophical hermeneutics and the late phenomenology of E.Husserl. Further, the role of phenomenology and hermeneutics in the development of historical methodology is analyzed on the example of the Annales school, and then the role of the latter in the origin and development of structuralism. In conclusion, the authors hypothesize that the philosophical traditionalism of R.Guenon and his followers, declaring their rejection of New European rationalism, reproduces the general methodological model of the era and anticipates postmodern intellectuals.

Keywords:

tradition, methodology, humanitarian knowledge, history, philosophical strategies, collective memory, hermeneutics, W.Dilthey, phenomenology, E.Husserl, structuralism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Декарт, Р. (1989), Сочинения: в 2 т., т. 1, М.: Мысль.

Гадамер, Г.Х. (1988), Истина и метод, М.: Прогресс.

Дильтей, В. (1988), Переживание и автобиография, Вопросы философии, № 4, с. 135–152.

Зотов, А.Ф. (2001), Современная западная философия, М.: Высшая школа.

Гуссерль, Э. (2004), Кризис европейских наук и трансцендентальная феноменология, СПб.: Владимир Даль

Гуссерль, Э. (2003), Картезианские размышления, СПб.: Наука.

Губин, В.Д., Стрелков, В.И. (2007), Власть истории: Очерки по истории философии истории: Курс лекций, М.: РГГУ

Бергсон, А. (1992), Материя и память, в Бергсон, А., Собрание сочинений: в 4 т., т. 1, М.: Московский клуб

Делез, Ж. (2001), Эмпиризм и субъективность: опыт о человеческой природе по Юму. Критическая философия Канта: учение о способностях. Бергсонизм. Спиноза, М.: PERSE.

Хаттон, П. (2003), История как искусство памяти, СПб.: Владимир Даль.

Гуревич, А.Я. (1992), Филипп Арьес: Смерть как проблема исторической антропологии. Предисловие, в Арьес, Ф., Человек перед лицом смерти, М.: Прогресс-Академия, с. 5–31.


References

Descartes, R. (1989), Works in 2 volumes, vol. 1., Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Gadamer, G.H. (1988), Truth and method, Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russian)

Dilthey, W. (1988), Experience and autobiography, Voprosy filosofii, no. 4, pp. 135–152. (In Russian)

Zotov, A.F. (2001), Modern Western philosophy, Moscow: Vysshaia shkola Publ. (In Russian)

Husserl, E. (2004), The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology, St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ. (In Russian)

Husserl, E. (2003), Cartesian reflections, St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Gubin, V.D. and Strelkov, V.I. (2007), The power of history: Essays on the history of the philosophy of history: A course of lectures, Moscow: RGGU Publ. (In Russian)

Bergson, A. (1992), Matter and memory, in Bergson. A.Collected works in 4 vols., vol. 1, Moscow: Moskovskii klub Publ. (In Russian)

Deleuze, G. (2001), Empiricism and Subjectivity: an experience about human nature according to Hume. Kant’s Critical Philosophy: the doctrine of abilities. Bergsonism. Spinoza, Moscow: PERSE Publ. (In Russian)

Hutton, P. (2003), History as the art of memory, St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ. (In Russian)

Gurevich, A.Ya. (1992), Philippe Ariès: Death as a problem of historical anthropology. Preface, in Ariès, Ph., A man in the face of death, pp. 5–31, Moscow: Progress-Akademiia Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Sokolov, A. M., & Kuznetsov, N. V. (2021). The problem of tradition and philosophical strategies of modernity. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 37(4), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.401