The Invisible Enemy: From Metaphor to Concept

Authors

  • Natalia A. Balakleets Samara State Technical University, 244, Molodogvardeyskaya ul., Samara, 443100, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.301

Abstract

The problem, the solution of which this article is devoted to, is related to the lack of special studies of the concept of “invisible enemy” in political philosophy. Existing theoretical works do not pay enough attention to this concept. Its metaphorical use fails to make explicit all of its potential and importance for political philosophy. As “invisible enemies” only in the metaphorical sense of this term can be regarded objects that have a non-anthropogenic nature (viruses, bacteria, sources of disease), as well as extraneous elements of the political body that have destructive potential. The analysis carried out revealed two semantic areas of using the concept of “invisible enemies”, relevant to political philosophy, and namely physical and symbolic invisibility. The physical invisibility, which is regarded in the works by Сarl von Clausewitz, Сarl Schmitt, Zygmunt Bauman, Grégoire Chamayou and others, belongs to enemies on the battlefield or to remote warfare. Russian philosophers look at this concept from an ethical perspective (Vladimir Solovyov, Lev Karsavin, Nikolai Berdyaev, Fyodor Stepun). The author of the article substantiates the thesis about the situational and relative nature of the phenomenon of the invisible enemy, associated with reaching the limit of perceptual indistinguishability. The physical invisibility of the enemy is caused by the appropriation of new war spaces in which vertical dimensions are established. Arguing with the ideas of Carl Schmitt, the author uses this concept not only in relation to the irregular fighters (partisans), but also in relation to modern combatants. The ways of acquisition of the symbolic invisibility are revealed in the works of Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, Carl Schmitt. It is based on the transfer of the war actor to a different semantic field, in which it is depoliticized and re-symbolized as a civilian object.

Keywords:

invisible enemy, politics, war, enmity, space, body

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Соловьев, В.С. (2010), Оправдание добра, в: Соловьев, В.С., Нравственная философия. Избранное, М.: Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН), с. 198–423.

Карсавин, Л.П. (2011), Человек в христианстве, в: Карсавин Л.П., Философия истории, Минск: Изд-во Белорусского экзархата, с. 621–766.

Степун, Ф. (1926), Из писем прапорщика-артиллериста, Прага: Пламя.

Шмитт, К. (2007), Теория партизана, М.: Праксис.

Бауман, З. (2010), Актуальность Холокоста, М.: Европа.

Шамаю, Г. (2020), Теория дрона, М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, Музей современного искусства «Гараж».

Shaw, D.M. (2020), Invisible Enemies: Coronavirus and Other Hidden Threats, Journal of bioethical inquiry, vol. 17 (4), pp. 531–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10015-w.

Farris, S., Yuval-Davis, N. and Rottenberg, C. (2021), The Frontline as Performative Frame: An Analysis of the UK COVID Crisis, State Crime Journal, vol. 10 (2), pp. 284–303, https://doi.org/10.13169/ statecrime.10.2.0284.

Sontag, S. (2005), Krankheit als Metapher, in: Sontag, S., Krankheit als Metapher, Aids und seine Metaphern, 2. Aufl., Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer, S. 9–74.

Bischof, K. (2015), Metaphern und deren Relevanz in der politischen Theorie, in: Global Player EU? Eine ideologiekritische Metaphernanalyse, Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, S. 11–81.

Канторович, Э.Х. (2015), Два тела короля. Исследование по средневековой политической теологии, М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара.

Гоббс, Т. (2001), Левиафан, М.: Мысль.

Шмитт, К. (2016), Понятие политического, СПб.: Наука.

Слинин, Я.А. (2004), Феноменология интерсубъективности, СПб.: Наука.

Руссо, Ж.-Ж. (1938), Об общественном договоре. Приципы политического права, М.: Государственное социально-экономическое издательство.

Шмитт, К. (2008), Номос Земли в праве народов jus publicum europaeum, СПб.: Владимир Даль.

Клаузевиц, К. (2009), О войне: части 5-6, М.: РИМИС.

Бердяев, Н.А. (2006), О рабстве и свободе человека, М.: АСТ; АСТ Москва; Хранитель.

Flickinger, B. (2007), Krieg und Kino. Visuelle Waffen im Spiel mit der Wahr-Nehmung, in: Krieg. Vergleichende Perspektiven aus Kunst, Musik und Geschichte, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter GmbH, S. 187–200.

Декомб, В. (2004), Современная французская философия, М.: Весь мир.

Сартр, Ж.-П. (2001), Воображаемое. Феноменологическая психология воображения, СПб.: Наука.

Jaspers, K. (1958), Die Atombombe und die Zukunft des Menschen. Politisches Bewusstsein in unserer Zeit, München: R.Piper & Co Verlag.

Бэкон, Ф. (1962), Новая Атлантида, в: Бэкон, Ф., Новая Атлантида. Опыты и наставления нравственные и политические, М.: Изд-во АН СССР, с. 5–33.


References

Solov’ev, V. S. (2010), The Justification of the Good, in: Solov’ev, V. S., Nravstvennaia filosofiia. Izbrannoe, Moscow: Rossiiskaia politicheskaia entsiklopediia (ROSSPEN) Publ., pp. 198–423. (In Russian)

Karsavin, L.P. (2011), The Human Person in Christianity, in: Karsavin, L.P., Filosofiia istorii, Minsk: Izd-vo Belorusskogo Ekzarkhata Publ., pp. 621–766. (In Russian)

Stepun, F. (1926), From the Letters of an Artillery Ensign, Praga: Plamia Publ. (In Russian)

Schmitt, C. (2007), Theory of the Partisan, Moscow: Praksis Publ. (In Russian)

Bauman, Z. (2010), Modernity and the Holocaust, Moscow: Evropa Publ. (In Russian)

Chamayou, G. (2020), A Theory of the Drone, Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., Muzei sovremennogo iskusstva “Garazh” Publ. (In Russian)

Shaw, D.M. (2020), Invisible Enemies: Coronavirus and Other Hidden Threats, Journal of bioethical inquiry, vol. 17 (4), pp. 531–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-020-10015-w

Farris, S., Yuval-Davis, N. and Rottenberg, C. (2021), The Frontline as Performative Frame: An Analysis of the UK COVID Crisis, State Crime Journal, vol. 10 (2), pp. 284–303. https://doi.org/10.13169/ statecrime.10.2.0284.

Sontag, S. (2005), Krankheit als Metapher, in: Sontag, S., Krankheit als Metapher, Aids und seine Metaphern, 2. Aufl., Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer, pp. 9–74.

Bischof, K. (2015), Metaphern und deren Relevanz in der politischen Theorie, in: Global Player EU? Eine ideologiekritische Metaphernanalyse, Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, pp. 11–81.

Kantorowicz, E.H. (2015), The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology, Moscow: Institut Gaidara Publ. (In Russian)

Hobbes, Th. (2001), Leviathan, Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

Schmitt, C. (2016), The Concept of the Political, St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Slinin, Ya.A. (2004), The Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity, St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Rousseau, J.-J. (1938), The Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right, Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel’stvo Publ. (In Russian)

Schmitt, C. (2008), The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ. (In Russian)

Clauzewitz, C. (2009), On War: pt. 5–6, Moscow: RIMIS Publ. (In Russian)

Berdyaev, N.A. (2006), Slavery and Freedom, Moscow: AST; AST Moskva; Khranitel’ Publ. (In Russian)

Flickinger, B. (2007), Krieg und Kino. Visuelle Waffen im Spiel mit der Wahr-Nehmung, in: Krieg. Vergleichende Perspektiven aus Kunst, Musik und Geschichte, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter GmbH, S. 187–200.

Descombes, V. (2004), Modern French Philosophy, Moscow: Ves’ mir Publ. (In Russian)

Sartre, J.-P. (2001), The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination, St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

Jaspers, K. (1958), Die Atombombe und die Zukunft des Menschen. Politisches Bewusstsein in unserer Zeit, München: R.Piper & Co Verlag.

Bacon, F. (1962), New Atlantis, in: Bacon, F., Novaia Atlantida. Opyty i nastavleniia nravstvennye i politicheskie, Moscow: AN SSSR Publ., pp. 5–33. (In Russian)

Published

2023-09-28

How to Cite

Balakleets, N. A. (2023). The Invisible Enemy: From Metaphor to Concept. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 39(3), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.301