Социальный конфликт и риск в междисциплинарном анализе

Daur A. Abgadshava; Alexandr I. Strebkov

doi:10.21638/spbu17.2022.206

Authors

Daur A. Abgadshava St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
Alexandr I. Strebkov St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.206

Abstract

The article analyzes conflict and risk from the standpoint of an interdisciplinary approach, which is increasingly gaining recognition and authority as a methodological paradigm that opens up scientific prospects, especially in the analysis of the multi-component phenomena of social life. Claims of Conflictology as a young science to be interdisciplinary in nature are due to its subject, the way of interaction in society, penetrating all spheres, and at the same time denying and affirming connections and dependencies at the same time, thereby determining the image of society itself. Society as a system in the disciplinary paradigm of conflict analysis is presented as a product of contradictions that manifest themselves in conflict as a destructive force. This force threatens existing security and seeks to abolish existing systems of relations. In the interdisciplinary paradigm, the destructive function of conflict is conceived as a preparatory stage for its creative ability to resolve the accumulated contradictions. In the disciplinary paradigm, conflict is a way of destroying the world; in an interdisciplinary one, it is a way of destroying the old and creating a new world. In the first case, the non-systemic nature of the conflict is indicated, in the second, it is indicated that the conflict is the law of the existing system, without which this system cannot reproduce itself. Turning to interdisciplinary analysis allows us to see in the conflict both its negative and positive properties, regardless of how antagonistic the opposites that take place in society are. Interdisciplinary analysis also leads us to an understanding of the identity and difference between conflict and risk, allowed us to consider the issue of social risk in the context of the issue of conflict, reveal the socio-genetic relationship between them and come to the conclusion that conflict produces risk, the latter is fixed in relationships, becoming their indispensable element, exerting a reverse effect on the conflict, setting limits for the actions of the interacting parties.

Keywords:

interdisciplinarity, interdisciplinary approach, conflictology, conflict, risk

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Львов, А.А. (2021), Специфика историко-философского исследования в гуманитарных науках, Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология, т. 37, вып. 3, с. 449–463.

Мокий, В.С. и Лукьянова, Т.А. (2017), Междисциплинарные взаимодействия в современной науке: подходы и перспективы, Экономическая наука современной России, вып. 3, с. 7–21.

Дарендорф, Р. (1998), После 1989. Мораль, революция и гражданское общество. Размышления о революции в Европе, М.: Ad Marginem.

Ковальчук, М. Конвергенция наук и технологий: от неживого к живому. 1-я лекция. URL: https://smotrim.ru/video/778688 (дата обращения 15.02.2022).

Карпова, Е.Г. и Карпов, Э.С. (2019), Междисциплинарность в образовании как следствие трансформационных процессов в обществе, в: Междисциплинарность в современном социально-гуманитарном знании — 2019 (Знания как цель, средство и катализатор общественного развития в цифровом мире): материалы Четвертой международной конференции (Ростов-на-Дону, 20–22 июня 2019 г.): в 3 т., т. 2, ч. 2, Южный федеральный университет; [отв. ред. Е.Ю.Баженова], Ростов-на-Дону, Таганрог: Издательство Южного федерального университета, с. 92–100.

Четверть россиян отказались верить соцопросам. URL: http://www.sovross.ru/modules.php?na me=News&file=article&sid=602130 (дата обращения: 10.02.2022).

Блок, М. Апология истории, или Ремесло историка. URL: https://mir-knig.com/read_222590- 3 (дата обращения: 07.01.2022).

Маркс, К. и Энгельс, Ф. (1955), Немецкая идеология, в: Маркс, К.и Энгельс, Ф., Сочинения, М.: Государственное изд-во политической литературы, т. 3, с. 7–544.

Маркс, К. (1955), Нищета философии, в: Маркс, К. и Энгельс, Ф., Сочинения, М.: Государственное изд-во политической литературы, т. 4, с. 65–186.

Козер, Л. (2000), Функции социального конфликта, перев. с англ. Назарова, О.А., М.: ИдеяПресс, Дом интеллектуальной книги.

Маркс, К. (1957), Восемнадцатое Брюмера Луи Бонапарта, в: Маркс, К. и Энгельс, Ф., Сочинения, М.: Государственное изд-во политической литературы, т. 8, с. 115–217.

Анцупов, А.Я. (2020), Проблема общей понятийной схемы описания конфликтов, Конфликтология, т. 15, № 2, с. 13–37.

Луман, Н. (1994), Понятие риска, THESIS, вып. 5, с. 135–160

Данилин, А.Б. (2019), Будущее России: суверенитет, качество жизни, модернизация, М.: Современные тетради.

Энгельс, Ф. (1955), Наброски к критике политической экономии, в: Маркс, К. и Энгельс, Ф., Сочинения, М.: Государственное изд-во политической литературы, т. 1, с. 544–571.

Федеральный закон от 26.07.2006 № 135-ФЗ «О защите конкуренции» с изменениями, вступившими в силу с 01.01.2022 года (ред. 57). URL: https://logos-pravo.ru/zakon-no-135-fz-o-zashchitekonkurencii (дата обращения: 20.01.2022).

References

Lvov, A.A. (2021), Specifics of historical and philosophical research in the humanities, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, vol. 37, iss. 3, pp. 449–463. (In Russian)

Mokiy, V. S. and Lukyanova, T.A. (2017), Interdisciplinary interactions in modern science: approaches and prospects, Economic science of modern Russia, vol. 3, pp. 7–21. (In Russian)

Dahrendorf, R. (1998), After 1989. Morality, revolution and civil society. Reflections on the Revolution in Europe, Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ. (In Russian)

Kovalchuk, M. Convergence of sciences and technologies: from inanimate to living, 1st lecture, available at: https://smotrim.ru/video/778688 (accessed: 15.02.2022). (In Russian)

Karpova, E.G. and Karpov, E. S. (2019), Interdisciplinarity in education as a result of transformational processes in society, in: Mezhdistsiplinarnost’ v sovremennom sotsial’no-gumanitarnom znanii — 2019 (Znaniia kak tsel’, sredstvo i katalizator obshchestvennogo razvitiia v tsifrovom mire): Materialy Chetvertoi mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii (Rostov-na-Donu, 20–22 iiunia 2019 g.): v 3 t., t. 2, ch., 2, Iuzhnyi federal’nyi universitet; [otv. red. E. Iu. Bazhenova], Rostov-na-Donu, Taganrog: Izdatel’stvo Iuzhnogo federal’nogo universiteta Publ. (In Russian)

A quarter of Russians refused to believe opinion polls, available at: http://www.sovross.ru/modules.php ?name=News&file=article&sid=602130 (accessed: 10.02.2022). (In Russian)

Blok, М. Apology of History, or the Craft of the Historian, available at: https://mir-knig.com/ read_222590-3 (accessed: 07.01.2022). (In Russian)

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1955), German ideology, in: Marx, K. and Engels, F., Works, Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury Publ., vol. 3, pp. 7–544. (In Russian)

Marx, K. (1955), The Poverty of Philosophy, in: Marx, K. and Engels, F., Works, Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury Publ., vol. 4, pp. 65–186. (In Russian)

Coser, L. (2000), Functions of social conflict, transl. from English by Nazarova, O.A., Moscow: IdeaPress Publ., Dom intellektual’noi knigi Publ. (In Russian)

Marx, K. (1957), The eighteenth Brumaire Louis Bonaparte, in: Marx, K. and Engels, F., Works, Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury Publ., vol. 8, pp. 115–217. (In Russian)

Antsupov, A.Ya. (2020), The problem of the general conceptual scheme for describing conflicts, Conflictology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 13–37. (In Russian)

Luhmann, N. (1994), The concept of risk, THESIS, vol. 5, pp. 135–160. (In Russian)

Danilin, A.B. (2019), Future of Russia: sovereignty, quality of life, modernization, Moscow: Sovremennye tetradi Publ. (In Russian)

Engels, F. (1955), Sketches for the Critique of Political Economy, in: Marx, K. and Engels, F., Works, Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury Publ., vol. 1, pp. 544–571. (In Russian)

Federal Law No. 135-FZ of July 26, 2006 “On Protection of Competition” as amended from January 1, 2022 (rev. 57), available at: https://logos-pravo.ru/zakon-no-135-fz- about-competition-protection (accessed: 20.01.2022). (In Russian)