On Quantum Causality

Authors

  • Igor E. Pris Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 1/2, ul. Surganova, Minsk, 220072, Republic of Belarus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.305

Abstract

For Kant causality is an a priori category of the understanding, a necessary condition for the possibility of any experience. Later Wittgenstein’s philosophy rejects transcendentalism. We can only speak of causes and effects if in some basic situations, or ‘language games’, we already treat some things as causes of what happens. Since the notion of cause becomes meaningful only within a language game, it is not unambiguous. Quantum causal language games presuppose the use of quantum theory. We treat the latter as Wittgenstein’s grammar of a quantum form of life’, or rule (norm), anchored in its applications — quantum phenomena as language games. Quantum correlations are often interpreted as a manifestation of the nonlocality of quantum mechanics. This is a view of quantum phenomena from the perspective of classical physics. Our contextual point of view rejects the nonlocality of quantum theory in the sense of instantaneous causal influence at a distance. But it does not admit its locality in the sense of classical causality either. We introduce the notion of quantum causality which allows us to treat quantum correlations as local, but context-dependent. Their formal cause is an entangled wave function. Any particular quantum correlation, identifiable in a context of its observation as a result of the wave function reduction, post factum can be treated as a classical causal correlation. From the point of view of the proposed contextual quantum realism, epistemology is secondary, and ontology is sensitive to context. Quantum correlations exist (are real) before application of the theory, independently of their identification (description, measurement), but have no identity, which appears only as a result of application of the theory and their identification in the context. In other words, they are real, but not pre-determined, not autonomous.

Keywords:

classical correlation, quantum correlation, classical causality, quantum causality, language game, local realism, contextual quantum realism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Адорно, Т. (2014), Негативная диалектика, пер. с нем. Е.Л.Петренко, М.: АСТ.

Wittgenstein, L. (1993), Ursache und Wirkung: Intuitives Erfassen, in: Klagge, J.C. and Nordmann, A. (eds), Ludwig Wittgenstein: Philosophical Occasions, 1912–1951, Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hackett, pp. 370–405.

Benoist, J. (2018), Our Life with Truth, in: Martin, C. (ed), Language, Form of Life, and Logic: Investigations After Wittgenstein, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 155–172.

Кант, И. (2020), Пролегомены ко всякой будущей метафизике, которая может появиться, пер. В.С.Соловьева, М., Берлин: Директ-Медиа.

Прись, И.Е. (2020), Контекстуальность онтологии и современная физика, СПб.: Алетейа.

Everett, H. (1957), The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. The theory of the universal wave function. Dissertation. URL: https://inspirehep.net/literature/1358321 (дата обращения: 27.07.2022).

Schrödinger, E. (1958), Might perhaps energy be a merely statistical concept, Nuovo Cimento, vol. 9, is. 1, pp. 162–170.

Bitbol, M. (2015), La Pratique des Possibles, une lecture pragmatiste et modale de la mécanique quantique, Paris: Hermann.

Bitbol, M. (2019), Maintenant la finitude, Paris: Flammarion.

Benoist, J. (2017), L’adresse du réel, Paris: Vrin.

Лекторский, В.А. (2008), Конструктивизм и реализм в эпистемологии, Философские науки, No 3, с. 5–9.

Bitbol, M. (1983), An analysis of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations in terms of events, Physics Letters, vol. 96A, pp. 66–70.

Прись, И.Е. (2012), О смысле принципа соответствия и единства физики, Analytica, No 6, c. 18–35.

Wittgenstein, L. Nachlass. The Bergen electronic edition (BEE). URL: http://wab.uib.no/wab_BEE.page (дата обращения: 27.07.2022).

Ben-Menahem, Y. (1998), Explanation and Description: Wittgenstein on Convention, Synthese, vol. 115, pp. 99–130.

Becker, A. (2018), What is real? The unfinished quest for the meaning of quantum physics, New York: Basic Books.

Cassirer, E. (2000), La Théorie de la relativité d’Einstein, Paris: Cerf.

Fine, K. (2005), Tense and reality, in: Fine, K. (ed.), Modality and tense: Philosophical papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 261–320.

Simon, J. (2018), Fragmenting the wave function, in: Bannett, K. and Zimmerman, D.W.(eds), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 11, pp. 123–146.

Прись, И.Е. (2020), Фрагментализм и контекстуальный реализм, Философия науки, No 1 (84), c. 19–66.

Прись, И.Е. (2022), Знание в контексте, СПб.: Алетейя.

Iaquinto, S. and Calosi, C. (2021), Is the world a heap of quantum fragments? Philosophical Studies, vol. 178, pp. 2009–2019.

Benoist, J. (2023), No Limit. On What Thought Can Actually Do, in: Pier, J.(ed.), Limits of Intelligi- bility: Issues from Kant and Wittgenstein, London: Routledge, pp. 262–279.


References

Adorno, Т. (2014), Negative Dialectics, trans. by Petrenko, Е.L., Moscow: АSТ Publ. (In Russian)

Wittgenstein, L. (1993), Ursache und Wirkung: Intuitives Erfassen, in: Klagge, J.C. and Nordmann, A. (eds), Ludwig Wittgenstein: Philosophical Occasions, 1912–1951, Indianapolis, Cambridge: Hackett, pp. 370–405.

Benoist, J. (2018), Our Life with Truth, in: Martin, C. (ed), Language, Form of Life, and Logic: Investigations After Wittgenstein, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 155–172.

Каnt, I. (2020), Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Present Itself as a Science, trans. by Solovyev, V. S., Moscow, Berlin: Direct-Media Publ. (In Russian)

Pris, I.Е. (2020), Contextuality of ontology and contemporary physics, St Petersburg: Aleteiia Publ.(In Russian

Everett, H. (1957), The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. The theory of the universal wave function. Dissertation. URL: https://inspirehep.net/literature/1358321 (дата обращения: 27.07.2022).

Schrödinger, E. (1958), Might perhaps energy be a merely statistical concept, Nuovo Cimento, vol. 9, is. 1, pp. 162–170.

Bitbol, M. (2015), La Pratique des Possibles, une lecture pragmatiste et modale de la mécanique quantique, Paris: Hermann.

Bitbol, M. (2019), Maintenant la finitude, Paris: Flammarion.

Benoist, J. (2017), L’adresse du réel, Paris: Vrin.

Lektorsky, V.A. (2008), Constructivism and realism in epistemology, Philosophical Sciences, no. 3,pp. 5–9.

Bitbol, M. (1983), An analysis of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations in terms of events, Physics Letters, vol. 96A, pp. 66–70.

Pris, I.Е. (2012), Оn the meaning of the correspondence principle, Analytica, no. 6, pp. 18–35. (In Russian)

Wittgenstein, L. Nachlass. The Bergen electronic edition (BEE). URL: http://wab.uib.no/wab_BEE.page (дата обращения: 27.07.2022).

Ben-Menahem, Y. (1998), Explanation and Description: Wittgenstein on Convention, Synthese, vol. 115, pp. 99–130.

Becker, A. (2018), What is real? The unfinished quest for the meaning of quantum physics, New York: Basic Books.

Cassirer, E. (2000), La Théorie de la relativité d’Einstein, Paris: Cerf.

Fine, K. (2005), Tense and reality, in: Fine, K. (ed.), Modality and tense: Philosophical papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 261–320.

Simon, J. (2018), Fragmenting the wave function, in: Bannett, K. and Zimmerman, D.W.(eds), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 11, pp. 123–146.

Pris, I.Е. (2020), Fragmentalism and contextual realism, Philosophy of science, no. 1 (84), pp. 19–66. (In Russian

Pris, I.Е. (2022), Knowledge in context, St Petersburg: Aleteiia Publ. (In Russian)

Iaquinto, S. and Calosi, C. (2021), Is the world a heap of quantum fragments? Philosophical Studies, vol. 178, pp. 2009–2019.

Benoist, J. (2023), No Limit. On What Thought Can Actually Do, in: Pier, J.(ed.), Limits of Intelligi- bility: Issues from Kant and Wittgenstein, London: Routledge, pp. 262–279.

Published

2023-09-28

How to Cite

Pris, I. E. (2023). On Quantum Causality. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 39(3), 462–477. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.305