From the “logic of paradoxes” to dialectical logic (historical transformation of Spinozist methodology)

Marina Yu. Savelieva

doi:10.21638/spbu17.2022.309

Authors

Marina Yu. Savelieva Centre for Humanitarian Education of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine, 01001, Kiev, ul. Tryokhsvyatitelskaya, 4

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.309

Abstract

The article deals with the features of the transformation of the philosophical cognitive methodology in the heritage of B. Spinoza. The central concept of Spinozism is the concept of “substance”, which plays not only a meaningful, but also a formal role in his philosophy. An analysis of the interpretation of the term “substance” by Spinoza reveals its paradoxical nature. The paradox arises in the context of operating with extremely abstract and universal concepts, therefore, thinkers always try to give these concepts a natural-philosophical character, make them more meaningful and thereby reduce the level of their inconsistency. Spinoza’s idea of substantiality as a criterion of the absolute essence of God clearly proves this. Referring to God as an absolute and universal substantial criterion, Spinoza tried to restore in rights the religious status of ontology and metaphysics, which was questioned by the theory of innate ideas of Descartes and achieved the exact opposite result. On the one hand, the substantiality of God appeared to be consistent and universal; on the other hand, His substantial character was the basis for the denial of His absoluteness, because infinite substance seeks to self-determination and self-restraint. Thus, Spinoza became the author of the concept of an absolutely contradictory substantial God as the absolute foundation of a contradictory world and the contradictory nature of human knowledge. In this sense, the paradox manifests itself not only as an obstacle to objective historical knowledge, but also as a way of transforming philosophical ideas in the history of mankind. This is the only way to understand the essence of the transformation of the ideas of Spinozism in the philosophy of Hegelianism and Marxism: the adoption of the formal features of the metaphysical concept of “substance” became the basis for the transformation of the metaphysical logic of paradox to dialectical logic.

Keywords:

paradox, substance, God, foundation, contradiction, logic, dialectics, method

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

Heidegger, M. (1962), Being and Time, trans. by Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E., Oxford: Basil Blackwall Publisher Ltd.

Epstein, M. (2020), Occam’s Razor and the Axiomatics of Human Experience. The Problem of Reducing/Multiplying Entities in a Modern Context, Philosophical Polylogue, no. 2, pр. 129–142. (In Russian)

Ilyenkov, E. (1970), Substance, in: Philosophical Encyclopedia, in 5 vols, vol. 5, Moscow: Sovetskaia entsiklopediia Publ., p. 151. (In Russian)

Katrechko, S.L. (2002), Russell’s Paradox of Barber and the Dialectic of Plato — Aristotle, in Modern logic: Problems of Theory, History and Application in Science, St Petersburg: St Petersburg University Press, pp. 239–242. (In Russian)

Russell, B. (1946), History of Western Philosophy and its Connection with Political and Social Circumstances from the Earliest Times to the Present Day, Great Britain: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1896), Lectures on the History of Philosophy, in 3 vols, vol. 3, trans. from German by Haldane, E. S. and Sinson, F.H., London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. Ltd.

Deborin, A.M. (1930), Essays on the history of materialism of the 17th–18th centuries, 3rd ed., Moscow and Leningrad: Goslitizdat Publ. (In Russian)

Spinoza, B. (1891), Ethics, in: The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, trans. from Latin, with an Introduction by Elwes, R.H.M., vol. 2, London: George Bell & Sons, York Street, Covent Garden, pp. 45–271.

Spinoza, B. (1891), On the Improvement of the Understanding, in: The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, trans. from Latin, with an Introduction by Elwes, R.H.M., vol. 2, London: George Bell & Sons, York Street, Covent Garden, pp. 1–41.

Marx, K. (1879), To Maxim Kovalevsky, London, April, 1879, trans. from Russian, in: The Collected Works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels (MECW), New York: International Publishers; London: Lawrence & Wishart Ltd.; Moscow: Progress Publishers, in collaboration with the Institute of Marxism-Leninism, vol. 45.

Marx, K. (1858), To Ferdinand Lassalle in Berlin, London, May, 31, 1858, in: The Collected Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels (MECW), New York: International Publishers; London: Lawrence & Wishart Ltd.; Moscow: Progress Publishers, in collaboration with the Institute of Marxism-Leninism, vol. 40, pp. 315–316.

Heidegger, M. (1997), Der Satz von Grund in: Heidegger, M., Gesamtausgabe. 1. Abteilung: Verцffentlichte Schriften 1910–1976, Bd. 10, Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH.