Цифровой суверенитет и политико-административные режимы

Tat’jana A. Kulakova; Anna V. Volkova

doi:10.21638/spbu17.2023.108

Authors

Tat’jana A. Kulakova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
Anna V. Volkova St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.108

Abstract

Continuing the cycle of publications on the socio-political aspects of digitalization, the authors note that digital transformation, aimed primarily at social and anthropological changes, at expanding opportunities in managing society and the individual, has exacerbated the extremely fundamental issue of managing the Internet space and the problem of developing political and administrative modes. Based on the model of power organization proposed by M.Mann, the authors focus on the ability of the state authorities of the USA, EU, China, and Russia to combine collective and distributive, extensive and intensive, authoritative and diffuse power. State control in the conditions of total hybrid war and deepening uncertainty in the world, as it seems to many researchers, can be supported by the active implementation of digital transformation tools by modern states as a single “language” of coordination. Incomplete institutional viability forces governments to seek support in supranational and international structures. Financial and economic limitations, the lack of critical technical, technological and managerial competencies bind the possibility of implementing an independent policy of the country’s digital transformation, forcing it to maneuver between those who have the most advanced competencies in these areas. The non-obviousness and weak articulation of national values, ethical norms, the assimilation of alien ideals by the mass consciousness deprive the motivation of those employed in the digital sphere, who are looking for applications for their talents in other states. The authors conclude that involvement in publicity in the context of the rapid development of digitalization should be based on the principle of openness of the unconditional public good offered by the authorities, the public goal, which implies transparency, accountability, and controllability of the authorities. Responsibility of both the authorities and society for the present and future, which generate trust, are the foundations of solidarity in the face of external and internal challenges, providing both formal and informal types of coordination.

Keywords:

political and administrative regimes, coordination, IT giants, game theory, antagonistic games, public administration strategies, civil communities

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Ziewitz, M., Pentzold, C. (2016), In search of internet governance: performing order in digitally networked environments, New Media & Society, 2014, vol. 16 (2), pp. 306–322.

Hofmann, J., Katzenbach, C. and Gollatz, K. (2017), Between coordination and regulation: Finding the governance in Internet governance, New media, vol. 19 (9), pp. 1406–1423, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816639975

Кулакова, Т.А. (2013), Координационное государство, в: Сморгунов, Л.В. (ред.), Сетевой анализ публичной политики, М.: РГ-Пресс, с. 67–72.

Кулакова, Т.А., Лукьянова, Г.В. и Волкова, А.В. (2022), От экономического патернализма к цифровому контролю, Проблемы современной экономики, № 1 (81), с. 79–83.

Кулакова, Т.А. (2011), Политика изменений: административные реформы и взаимодействие государства и общества, СПб.: Издательство С.-Петерб. гос. ун-та, с. 176–210.

Будко, Д.А., Волкова, А.В. и Кулакова, Т.А. (2022), Цифровой вигилантизм: экономический ракурс, Проблемы современной экономики, № 1 (81), с. 83–87.

Волкова, А.В. (2022), Гражданская наука и государственная управляемость, в: Сморгунов, Л.В. (ред.), Политическая онтология цифровизации и государственная управляемость, М.: Аспект Пресс, с. 257–259.

Кулакова, Т.А., Пашкус В.Ю. и Волкова, А.В. (2020), Сети против иерархий или новые иерархии? Возможности и ограничения сетевого подхода в управлении публичной политикой, Проблемы современной экономики, № 1 (73), с. 40–44.

Волкова, А.В. (2022), Политическая аксиология цифровизации, в: Сморгунов, Л.В. (ред.), Политическая онтология цифровизации и государственная управляемость, М.: Аспект Пресс, c. 119– 130.

Манн, М. (2020), Становление классов и наций-государств, 1760–1914 (книга первая), Источники социальной власти: в 4 т., М.: Издательский дом «Дело» РАНХиГС.

Фергюсон, Н. (2020), Площадь и башня. Сети и власть от масонов до Facebook, М.: АСТ.

Volkova, A. V. and Kulakova, T.A. (2020), Network, procedural and cognitive components of digital public governance implementation designs the experience of European countries, Вестник Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета. Философия и конфликтология, т. 37 (1), pp. 118–135.

Волкова, А.В. и Кулакова, Т.А. (2022), Особенности институциональных дизайнов внедрения цифрового публичного управления в Европейском Союзе, в: Сморгунов, Л.В. (ред.), Политическая онтология цифровизации и государственная управляемость, М.: Аспект Пресс, с. 147–167.

References

Ziewitz, M., Pentzold, C. (2016), In search of internet governance: performing order in digitally networked environments, New Media & Society, 2014, vol. 16 (2), pp. 306–322.

Hofmann, J., Katzenbach, C. and Gollatz, K. (2017), Between coordination and regulation: Finding the governance in Internet governance, New media, vol. 19 (9), pp. 1406–1423, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816639975

Kulakova, T.A. (2013), Coordinating State, in: Smorgunov, L.V. (ed.), Setevoi analiz publichnoi politiki, Moscow: RG Press Publ., pp. 67–72. (In Russian)

Kulakova, T.A., Lukyanova, G.V. and Volkova, A.V. (2022), From economic paternalism to digital control, Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki, vol. 81 (1), pp. 79–83. (In Russian)

Kulakova, T.A. (2011), The policy of change: administrative reforms and interaction between the state and society, St Petersburg: St Petersburg University Press, pp. 176–210. (In Russian)

Budko, D.A., Volkova, A.V. and Kulakova, T.A. (2022), Digital vigilantism: an economic perspective, Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki, vol. 81 (1), pp. 83–87. (In Russian)

Volkova, A.V. (2022), Citizen Science and State Governability, in: Smorgunov, L.V. (ed.), Politicheskaia ontologiia tsifrovizatsii i gosudarstvennaia upravliaemost’, Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ., pp. 257– 259. (In Russian)

Kulakova, T.A., Pashkus V.U. and Volkova, A.V. (2020), Networks against hierarchies or new hierarchies? Opportunities and Limitations of the Network Approach in Public Policy Management, Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki, vol. 73 (1), pp. 40–44. (In Russian)

Volkova, A.V. (2022), Political axiology of digitalization, in: Smorgunov, L.V.(ed.), Politicheskaia ontologiia tsifrovizatsii i gosudarstvennaia upravliaemost’, Moscow: Aspekt Press, pp. 119–130. (In Russian)

Mann, М. (2020), The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914 (the first book), Istochniki sotsial’noi vlasti, in 4 vols, Мoscow, Delo Publ. (In Russian)

Ferguson, N. (2020), Square and tower. Networks and power from Masons to Facebook, Moscow: AST Publ. (In Russian)

Volkova, A.V. and Kulakova, T.A. (2020), Network, procedural and cognitive components of digital public governance implementation designs the experience of European countries, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, vol. 37 (1), pp. 118–135.

Volkova, A.V. and Kulakova, T.A. (2022), Features of institutional designs for the implementation of digital public administration in the European Union, in: Smorgunov, L.V.(ed.), Politicheskaia ontologiia tsifrovizatsii i gosudarstvennaia upravliaemost’, Moscow: Aspekt Press, pp. 147–167. (In Russian)