Internet of Behavior: Types, models, principles

Authors

  • Maxim A. Shatkin Povolzhsky Institute of Management named after P.A. Stolypin — Branch of Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, 164, ul. Moskovskaya, Saratov, 410012, Russian Federation
  • Mikhail O. Orlov Saratov Chernyshevsky State University, 83, ul. Astrakhanskaya, Saratov, 410012, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.212

Abstract

This article presents a general view and conceptualization of the Internet of Behavior from a social science perspective. The Internet of Behavior (IoB) is defined as a technology for machine monitoring, recognizing, and responding to human behavior (including emotion expression and biometrics). Based on the analysis of a typical case in higher education, the article forms the conceptual outline of social research on IoB by highlighting the types, possible models, and principles of IoB implementation. The study identifies three models of IoB: binary (based on checking the compliance of an individual’s behavior with the norm and his or her identification), medical (based on determining the physiological causes of certain human actions), and social (focused on identifying the features of human social behavior in addressing professional or other public problems). Monitoring, summarizing, and evaluating students’ social behavior potentially allows the implementation of new models of interaction between universities, employers, and students, based on the digitization and monetization of student engagement in learning and the responsibility of universities for the demand for graduates. The implementation of these models will lead to a profound transformation of higher education, including the digital servitization of education, the reduction of the established gap between knowledge and the social interactions associated with the generation, translation, and assimilation of this knowledge, and the inclusion of individual social behavior associated with professional knowledge in the list of those aspects of society that are subject to digitization and monetization. The basic principles of social IoB, without observance of which this technology can lead to anti-human consequences, are defined: privacy, multivalency of interpretation, continuity, relevance, and reflexivity.

Keywords:

Internet of Behavior, digitalization, digital transformation, digital servitization, privacy, education

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература / References

Nguyen, T. S., Wu, Z., and Ong, D.C. (2021), Attention uncovers task-relevant semantics in emotional narrative understanding, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107162

Cambria, E., Poria, S., Gelbukh, A. and Thelwall, M. (2017), Sentiment Analysis Is a Big Suitcase, IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 32 (6), pp. 74–80.

Göte Nyman’s blog. Internet of behaviors (IoB). Available at: https://gotepoem.wordpress.com/2012/03/16/internet-of-behaviors-ib/ (accessed: 10.02.2022).

Hsu, C.L., Chang, K.C. and Chen, M.C. (2011), Flow Experience and Internet Shopping Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Consumer Characteristics, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 29 (3), pp. 317–332.

Javaid, M. et al. (2021), Internet of Behaviours (IoB) and its role in customer services, Sensors International, no. 2, 100122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100122

Paiola, M. and Gebauer, H. (2020), Internet of things technologies, digital servitization and business model innovation in BtoB manufacturing firms, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 89, pp. 245–264.

Markfort, L., Arzt, A., Kögler, P., Jung, S., Gebauer, H., Haugk, S., Leyh, C. and Wortmann, F. (2021), Patterns of business model innovation for advancing IoT platforms, Journal of Service Management, vol. 33 (1), pp. 70–96.

Li L. (2021), Emotion Recognition of Foreign Language Teachers in College English Classroom Teaching, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, 788552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788552

Oo, T.T., Boonroungrut, C. and One, K. (2019), Exploring classroom emotion with cloud-based facial recognizer in the Chinese beginning class: a preliminary study, International Journal of Instruction, vol. 12, pp. 947–958.

Lee, K. and Fanguy, M. (2022), Online exam proctoring technologies: Educational innovation or deterioration?, British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13182

El-Khoury, M. and Arikan, C.L. (2021), From the internet of things toward the internet of bodies: Ethical and legal considerations, Strategic Change, vol. 30 (3), pp. 307–314.

Shatkin, M. (2022), Digital Transformation and the Evolution of the Platform Economy, in: Ertz, M. (ed.), Handbook of Research on the Platform Economy and the Evolution of E-Commerce, Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 1–24.

Arnò, S., Galassi, A., Tommasi, M., Saggino, A. and Vittorini, P. (2021), State-of-the-art of commercial proctoring systems and their use in academic online examsm, International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, vol. 19 (2), pp. 41–60.

Behera, N.K. S., Behera, T.K., Nappi, M., Bakshi, S. and Sa, P.K. (2021), Futuristic person reidentification over internet of biometrics things (IoBT): Technical potential versus practical reality, Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 151, pp. 163–171.

Strauß, S. (2021), “Don’t let me be misunderstood”: Critical AI literacy for the constructive use of AI technology, TATuP — Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie Und Praxis, vol. 30 (3), pp. 44–49.

Published

2023-07-01

How to Cite

Shatkin, M. A., & Orlov, M. O. (2023). Internet of Behavior: Types, models, principles. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 39(2), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.212