Hermeneutics of Betrayal: Image of Judas Iscariot in 20th–21st Century Belles-Lettres

Authors

  • Alexander I. Brodsky St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1694-0913

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2024.410

Abstract

Betrayal is an essentially pejorative notion. At the same time, it is a very polysemantic and broad ethical term. For us, “betrayal” is treason and sneaking, disclosure and concealment of secret plans, execution of an illegitimate order, and disobedience of orders. Those, who have recently been called traitors, often (and in a fairly short historical period) became heroes. Therefore, the problem arises: how we can reasonably say whether an action is treacherous? The justification procedure in ethics always entails a lot of paradoxes; when it comes to betrayal, the paradoxes become more obvious than in cases on which there has been an established consensus since ancient times: the murder of an innocent, theft, adultery, etc. To address the issue, the author of the article employs Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutic methodology and Alasdair MacIntyre´s ethical theory. In both cases, we need some kind of tales or narratives to substantiate our ethical assessments. “Real life” consists of individual events that are loosely connected and intrinsically lead nowhere, while any narrative presupposes coherence, a certain teleology, and thanks to this can easily fall into moral categories. The story of Judas Iscariot is certainly the fundamental narrative of betrayal. But this Gospel tale is so shrouded in a fog of innuendo and ambiguity that it has given rise to a wide variety of literary interpretations. Firstly, it is completely unnecessary for the history of Christ’s earthly life in general: it was possible to find, identify, and detain Jesus without Judas’ betrayal. Secondly, Judas’ motivation is unclear: the desire to get thirty pieces of silver seems too insignificant a reason. The article examines several literary versions of Judas´ betrayal, including those by Leonid Andreev, Jorge Luis Borges, Maximillian Voloshin, etc., to identify patterns that allow for a better understanding of any betrayal.

Keywords:

ethics, moral assessment, betrayal, Gospel, narrative, interpretation, event, conatus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Маркс, К. (1955), Морализирующая критика и критикизирующая мораль, пер. с нем., в: Маркс К. и Энгельс Ф., Сочинения: в 50 т., т. 4, М.: Изд-во полит. лит., с. 291–321.

Shklar, J.N. (1984), Ordinary Vices, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Margalit, A. (2017), On Betrayal, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Johnson, P. (1992), Frames of Deceit, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Макинтайр, А. (2000), После добродетели: Исследование теории морали, пер. Целищев, В., М.: Акад. проект.

Иезуитова, Л.А. (2003), Три Иуды в русской литературе Серебряного века: Л.Андреев, М.Волошин, А.Ремизов, в: Грачева, А. и д’Амелия, А. (ред.), Алексей Ремизов: Исследования и материалы, СПб., Салерно: Universita di Salerno, с. 55–68.

Мережковский, Д.С. (1996), Иисус Неизвестный, М.: Республика.

Ершов, С.А. (2016), (сост.), Книга Иуды, М.: Александрийская библиотека.

Муретов, М.Д. (1908), Иуда Предатель, Богословский Вестник, т. 1, № 1, с. 1–52.

Андреев, Л.А. (1990), Иуда Искариот, в: Андреев, Л.А. Собрание сочинений: в 6 т., т. 2, М.: Худ. лит., с. 210–264.

Оз, А. (2017), Иуда, пер. Радуцкий, В., М.: Фантом Пресс.

Казандзакис, Н. (1998), Последнее искушение, пер. Васильев, А., М.: Литера.

Волошин, М. (1988), Лики творчества, Л.: Наука.

Франс, А. (1958), Сад Эпикура, пер. Шадрин А., М., в: Франс А.Собрание сочинений: в 8 т., т. 3. М.: Изд-во худ. лит.

Вахитов, С. (2022), «Иуда Искариот» Леонида Андреева и основания интерпретации текста. URL: https://dzen.ru/a/YdFodkj3fG7tKoTk (дата обращения: 15.12.2023).

Борхес, Х.Л. (1994), Три версии предательства Иуды, пер. Лысенко, Е., в: Борхес, Х.Л., Письмена Бога, М.: Республика, с. 288–293.

Ианнуарий (Ивлиев) (2021),Евангелия от Иоанна. Богословско-экзегетический комментарий, М.: Изд-во ББИ.

Спиноза, Б. (1957), Этика, пер. Иванцев, Н.А., в: Спиноза, Б., Избранные произведения: в 2 т., т. 1, М.: Гос. изд-во полит. лит., с. 359–618.

Бадью, А. (2012), Этика. Очерк о сознании зла, пер. Лапицкий, В.В., СПб.: Machina.

Рикёр, П. (1995), Герменевтика. Этика. Политика. Московские лекции, пер. Мачульская, О., М.: Academia.

Аристотель (1983), Поэтика, пер. Гаспаров, М.Л., в: Аристотель, Сочинения: в 4 т., т. 4, М.: Мысль, с. 645–680.


References

Marx, K. (1955), Moralizing criticism and critiquing morality, in Marx, K. and Engels, F. Collected works, in 50 vols, vol. 4, Moscow: Politicheskaia literatura Publ., pp. 291–321. (In Russian)

Shklar, J.N. (1984), Ordinary Vices, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Margalit, A. (2017), On Betrayal, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Johnson, P. (1992), Frames of Deceit, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Macintyre, A. (2000), After Virtue. A study of Moral Theory, transl. by Tselishchev, V., Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt Publ. (In Russian)

Iezuitova, L.A. (2003), Three Judases in Russian literature of the Silver Age: L.Andreev, M.Voloshin, A.Remizov, in: Gracheva A. and Ameliia A.d’ (eds), Aleksei Remizov, Issledovaniia i materialy, St. Petersburg, Salerno: Universita di Salerno Publ., pp. 55–68. (In Russian)

Merezhkovsky, D. (1996), Jesus the Unknown, Moscow: Respublika Publ. (In Russian)

Ershov, S. (2016), (ed.), Book of Jude, Moscow: Aleksandriiskaia biblioteka Publ. (In Russian)

Muretov, M. (1908), Judas the traitor, Bogoslovskii Vestnik, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–52. (In Russian)

Andreev, L (1990) Judas Iscariot, in Andreev, L., Collected works, in 6 vols, vol. 2., Moscow: Khudozhestvennaiia literature Publ., pp. 210–264. (In Russian)

Oz, A. (2017), Judas, trans. by Radutskii, V., Moscow: Fantom Press Publ. (In Russian)

Kazandzakis, N. (1998), The last temptation, transl. by Vasil’ev, A., Moscow: Litera Publ. (In Russian)

Voloshin, M. (1988), Faces of creativity, Leningrad: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

France, A. (1958), Le jardin d’Épicure, transl. by Shadrin, A., in: France, A.Collected works, in 8 vols, vol. 3., Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ. (In Russian)

Vakhitov, S. (2022), “Judas Iscariot” by Leonid Andreev and the basis for interpreting the text. Available at: https://dzen.ru/a/YdFodkj3fG7tKoTk (accessed: 06.03.2019). (In Russian)

Borges, J.L. (1994), Tres versiones de Judas, trans. by Lysenko, E, in: Borges J.L Pis’mena Boga, Moscow: Respublika Publ., pp. 288–293. (In Russian)

Iannuarii (Ivliev) (2021), Gospel of John. Theological-exegetical commentary, Moscow: Bibleiskobogoslovskii institut Publ. (In Russian)

Spinoza, B de. (1957), Ethika, transl. by Ivantsev, N., in: Spinoza B., Selected works, in 2 vols, vol. 1. Moscow: Politicheskaia literatura Publ., pp. 359–618. (In Russian)

Badiou, A. (2012), L’ethique. Essai sur la conscience du mal, transl. by Lapitskii, V., St. Petersburg: Machina Publ. (In Russian)

Ricœur, P. (1995), Hermeneutics. Ethics. Policy. Moscow lectures, trans. by Machul’skaia, O., Moscow: Academia Publ. (In Russian)

Aristotle (1983), Poetics, transl. by Gasparov, M.L. in: Aristotle, Works, in 4 vols, vol. 4. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., pp. 645–680. (In Russian)

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Brodsky, A. I. (2024). Hermeneutics of Betrayal: Image of Judas Iscariot in 20th–21st Century Belles-Lettres. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 40(4), 689–702. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2024.410