ATTRIBUTIVE QUALITIES OF PERSONHOOD IN THE REVOLUTION OF TECHNOSPHERE

Authors

  • Владимир Павлович Козырьков Nizhny Novgorod State University, 23, pr. Gagarina, Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russian Federation;
  • Татьяна Владимировна Свадьбина Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University, 1, ul. Ulyanova, 603950, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation;
  • Ольга Алексеевна Немова Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University, 1, ul. Ulyanova, 603950, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation;

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.202

Abstract

Th e article presents an overview of the diff erent points of view on human nature, and gives a retrospective analysis of the contradictory role of technology in human life. From the standpoint of anthropological philosophy it is attempted to understand the discussion of the problem of increasing technicalization of society and, therefore, the threat of extinction of the human species. Opposing ideas are challenged, those of both the supporters and opponents of transhumanism. A return to Protagoras’ idea «Man is the measure of all things» and its application to the conditions of the XXI century are discussed. Th e fetish of technique is a dead-end branch of the philosophical understanding of the ongoing processes. Man is a сreator and consumer of technology and technological innovations, so the future of all mankind will depend on his will and reason. Any technology occurs as a vessel of holistic spirituality in diff erent forms and with diff erent character depending on the social system involved in its socialization and the forming of its cultural identity. Technology always accepts a sociocultural framing present in the society. Th e authors come to the conclusion that it is pointless to follow the maintenance and development of the demonizing alarmist image of technology, it is important to examine the socio-cultural changes of consciousness and the processes of dehumanization of mass consciousnesses. Refs 15.

Keywords:

anthropology, technosphere, the Posthuman, the dehumanization of mass consciousnesses

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Бахтин М. М. Собр. соч.: в 7 т. М.: Языки славянских культур 2008. Т. 4 ч. 1. 1120 с.

Горфункель А. Х. Философия эпохи Возрождения. М.: Высшая школа 1980. 368 с.

Леонардо да Винчи. Избр. произв.: в 2 т. М.: Изд-во Студии Артемия Лебедева 2010. Т. 1. 480 с. архив

Блюменберг Х. Жизненный мир и технизация с точки зрения феноменологии // Вопросы философии. 1993. № 10. С. 32–68.

Паскаль Б. Мысли. К.: REFL-book 1995. 56 с.

Хабермас Ю. Будущее человеческой природы. М.: Весь мир 2002. 144 с.

Хоружий С. С. Проблема постчеловека или Трансформативная антропология глазами синер- гийной антропологии // Философские науки. 2008. № 2. С. 10–31.

Кутырёв В. А. Культурологический смысл глобализма. URL: http://www.perspektivy.info/book/kulturologicheskij_smysl_globalizma_2010-11-02.htm (дата обращения: 15.09.2015).

Кутырёв В. А. Бытие или ничто. СПб.: Алетейя 2010. 496 с.

Кутырёв В. А. Реконструкция человека. URL: http://philosophy.ru/library/kutyrev/reconstructionofman.html/ (дата обращения: 15.09.2015).

Маслов В. М. Постчеловеческие перспективы и место философии техники в системе фило- софского знания // Сайт «Ассоциация футурологов». М. 2014. URL: http://futurologija.ru/bibl/ postchelovecheskoe/ (дата обращения: 15.09.2015).

Алексеева И. Ю. Аршинов В. И. Чеклецов В. В. «Технолюди» против «постлюдей»: НБИКС- революция и будущее человека // Вопросы философии. 2013. № 3. С. 12–21.

Цвык И. В. Философия техники: сущность перспективы развития // Личность. Культура. Об- щество. Международный журнал социальных и гуманитарных наук. 2010. Т. XII вып. 1 (№ 53–54). С. 226–233.

Козырьков В. П. Теоретические проблемы становления социологии дома // Личность. Культура. Общество. Международный журнал социальных и гуманитарных наук. 2009. Т. XI вып. 1 (№ 46–47). С. 301–309.

Козырьков В. П. Направления и формы доместикации современного общества // Вестн. Нижегородского ун-та им. Н. И. Лобачевского. Сер. Социальные науки. 2010. Вып. 1. С. 20–26.

References

Bakhtin M. M. Sobr. soch.: v 7 t. T. 4 ch. 1 [Collected Works. works: In 7 vols. Vol. 4. Part 1]. Moscow Languages of Slavic cultures 2008. 1120 p. (In Russian)

Gorfunkel’ A. Kh. Filosofi ia epokhi Vozrozhdeniia [Philosophy of the Renaissance]. Moscow Higher school 1980. 368 p. (In Russian)

Leonardo da Vinchi. Izbr. proizv.: v 2 t. T. 1 [FAV. etc.: In 2 vols. Vol. 1]. Moscow Studii Artemiia Lebedeva Publ. 2010. 480 p. (In Russian) архив

Bliumenberg Kh. Zhiznennyi mir i tekhnizatsiia s tochki zreniia fenomenologii [Life-world and tehnizatsiya from the point of view of phenomenology]. Voprosy fi losofi i [Questions of philosophy]1993 no. 10 pp. 32–68 (In Russian)

Paskal’ B. Mysli [Th oughts]. K. REFL-book Publ.1995 56 p. (In Russian)

Khabermas Iu. Budushchee chelovecheskoi prirody [Future of human nature]. Moscow Ves mir Publ. 2002. 144 p. (In Russian)

Khoruzhii S. S. Problema postcheloveka ili transformativnaia antropologiia glazami sinergiinoi antropologii [Th e Problem of the Posthuman or transformative anthropology through the eyes of synergetic anthropology]. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical sciences]2008 no. 2 pp. 10–31. (In Russian)

Kutyrev V. A. Kul’turologicheskii smysl globalizma [Cultural meaning of globalism]. Available at: http://www.perspektivy.info/book/kulturologicheskij_smysl_globalizma_2010-11-02.htm (accessed 15.09.2015). (In Russian)

Kutyrev V. A. Bytie ili nichto [Being or nothingness]. St. Petersburg: Aletheia Publ. 2010. 496 p. (In Russian)

Kutyrev V. A. Rekonstruktsiia cheloveka [Reconstruction of a person]. Available at: // http://philosophy.ru/library/kutyrev/reconstructionofman.html/ (accessed 15.09.2015). (In Russian)

Maslov V. M. Postchelovecheskie perspektivy i mesto fi losofi i tekhniki v sisteme fi losofskogo znaniia [A Posthuman perspectives and the place of philosophy of technology in the system of philosophical knowledge]. Sait Assotsiatsiia futurologoviu [Th e Website of the Association of futurologists]. Moscow 2014. Available at: // http://futurologija.ru/bibl/postchelovecheskoe/ (accessed 15.09.2015). (In Russian)

Alekseeva I. Iu. Arshinov V. I. Chekletsov V. V. «Tekhnoliudi» protiv «postliudei»: NBIKSrevoliutsiia i budushchee cheloveka [“Technology” against “postgeople”: NBICS- revolution and the future of human]. Voprosy fi losofi i [Questions of philosophy]2013 no. 3 pp. 12–21. (In Russian)

Tsvyk I. V. Filosofi ia tekhniki: sushchnost’ perspektivy razvitiia [Philosophy of technology: essence prospects of development]. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal sotsial’nykh i gumanitarnykh nauk [Personality. Culture. Society. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities]2010 vol. XII issue 1 no. 53–54 pp. 226–233. (In Russian)

Kozyr’kov V. P. Teoreticheskie problemy stanovleniia sotsiologii doma [Th eoretical problems of formation of sociology of home]. Lichnost’. Kul’tura. Obshchestvo. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal sotsial’nykh i gumanitarnykh nauk [Personality. Culture. Society. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities]2009 vol. XI issue 1 no. 46–47 pp. 301–309. (In Russian)

Kozyr’kov V. P. Napravleniia i formy domestikatsii sovremennogo obshchestva [Direction and form domesticates a modern society]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Ser. Sotsial’nye nauki2010 vol. 1 pp. 20–26. (In Russian)

Published

2018-10-03

How to Cite

Козырьков, В. П., Свадьбина, Т. В., & Немова, О. А. (2018). ATTRIBUTIVE QUALITIES OF PERSONHOOD IN THE REVOLUTION OF TECHNOSPHERE. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 32(2), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.202