IN THE CIRCLE OF NEW METHODOLOGICAL ORIENTATIONS

Authors

  • Надежда Константиновна Матросова St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.203

Abstract

Th е article «In the circle of new methodological orientations» focuses on the problems of methodology of contemporary cognition related to the procedures of knowledge construction, contemporary interpretation of rationality, the notion of intersubjectivity. Th e article explores contemporary interpretation of the truth, interrelation of knowledge in natural and social sciences. Th e importance of socio-cultural mechanisms of acquiring knowledge is pointed out, including background knowledge and relative knowledge. Methodological problems are compared with typological constructions, which include methodological rules of the contemporary world and serve as an explanation and confi rmation of contemporary cognitive strategy. Typological constructions include cognitive freedom as well as logical and epistemological rules. Th ey are theoretical and methodological synthesis of results, which have been acquired in socio-cultural and epistomological contexts and serve as a good indication of postneoclassical cognitive tendencies application. Refs 10.

Keywords:

methodology, typological construction, typologization, scientifi c rationality, knowledge, construction, intersubjectivity, the truth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Петренко В. Ф. Конструктивизм как новая парадигма в науках о человеке // Вопросы философии. 2011. № 6. С. 75–81.

Гутнер Г. Б. Ответ оппонентам // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2011. Т. ХХIХ № 3. С. 73– 75.

Матросова Н. К. Онтологические модели целостности и типологии // Философские науки. 2013. № 10. С. 52–64 архив

Гутнер Г. Б. Способы конституирования идеального предмета // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2011. Т. ХХIХ № 3. С. 49–56.

Полани М. Личностное знание. М.: Прогресс 1985. 344 с.

Антоновский А. Ю. Форма как условие интерсубъективного понимания // Интерсубъективность в науке и философии. М.: Канон 2014. С. 397–405.

Смирнова Н. М. Возможна ли междисциплинарная модель интерсубъективности? // Эписте- мология и философия науки. 2011. Т. XXVII № 1. С. 55–63.

Hill J. N. Evans R. K. A model for classifi cation and typology // Models in archeology / ed. by D. L. Clarke. London 1972. P. 231–273.

Taylor C. Irreducibly Social goods // Rationality Individualism and Public Policy. Canberra: Australian National University 1990. P. 45–63.

Аршинов В. И. Интерсубъективность в онтологии парадигмы сложности // Интерсубъективность в науке и философии. М.: Канон 2014. С. 89–105.

References

Petrenko V. F. Konstruktivizm kak novaia paradigma v naukakh o cheloveke [Constructivism as a new paradigm in the human Sciences]. Voprosy fi losofi i [Questions of philosophy]2011 no. 6 pp. 75–8l. (In Russian)

Gutner G. B. Otvet opponentam [Answer for opponents]. Epistemologiia i fi losofi ia nauki [Epistemology and philosophy of science]2011 vol. XXIX no. 3 pp. 73–75. (In Russian)

Matrosova N. K. Ontologicheskie modeli tselostnosti i tipologii [To ontological model of integrity and typology]. Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical Sciences]2013 no. 10 pp. 52–64. архив

Gutner G. B. Sposoby konstituirovaniia ideal’nogo predmeta [Th e ways of constitution of an ideal subject]. Epistemologiia i fi losofi ia nauki [Epistemology and philosophy of science] 201l vol. XXIX no. 3 pp. 49–56. (In Russian)

Polani M. Lichnostnoe znanie [Personal knowledge]. Moscow Progress Publ. 1985. 344 p. (In Russian)

Antonovskii A. Iu. Forma kak uslovie intersub”ektivnogo ponimaniia Intersub”ektivnost’ v nauke i fi losofi i [перевод]. Moscow Kanon Publ. 2014. S. 397–405.

Smirnova N. M. Vozmozhna li mezhdistsiplinarnaia model’ intersub»ektivnosti? [Is the interdisciplinary model of intersubjectivity possible?]. Epistemologiia i fi losofi ia nauki [Epistemology and philosophy of science]2011 vol. XXVII no. 1 pp. 55–63. (In Russian)

Hill J. N. Evans R. K. A model for classifi cation and typology. Models in archeology. Ed. by D. L. Clarke. London1972 pp. 231–273.

Taylor C. Irreducibly Social goods. Rationality Individualism and Public Policy. Canberra Australian National University Press1990 pp. 45–63.

Arshinov V. I. Intersub”ektivnost’ v ontologii paradigmy slozhnosti [Intersubjectivity in the ontology of the paradigm of complexity]. Intersub”ektivnost’ v nauke i fi losofi i [Intersubjectivity in science and philosophy]. Moscow Kanon2014 pp. 89–105. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2018-10-03

How to Cite

Матросова, Н. К. (2018). IN THE CIRCLE OF NEW METHODOLOGICAL ORIENTATIONS. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 32(2), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.203

Issue

Vol. 32 No. 2 (2016): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 17. PHILOSOPHY. CONFLICT STUDIES. CULTURE STUDIES. RELIGIOUS STUDIES.

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.