REPRESENTATION OF NON-SERIALITY IN HANDMADE PRACTICEE

Authors

  • Екатерина Эдуардовна Сурова St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Марина Александровна Васильева St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.212

Abstract

Th is paper discusses an interesting aspect of handmade realization as a modern hobby-project. As a many-sided phenomenon, the handmade project actualizes several questions and features of modern culture. In this paper authors focus their attention on the special status of hand-made product that becomes very important for social and cultural interactions of diff erent types. A man-made thing is opposite to the mass-production and this position for authors’ opinion became a special cultural point. Representation of non-seriality, uniqueness, personifi cation is analyzed in this paper as an inherent feature of modern handiwork and also as the basis for communication and identifi cation practices. Authors research the main way of getting this special status for a handmade product and its representation in communication and gift -giving acts, they apply to several specifi c characteristics. In particular, the most eff ective method of marking a handmade product is leaving a tiny defect which can be researched in terms of stigma-theory by E. Goff man. Th is defect puts the thing in opposition to the world of ideal machine-produced objects and becomes evidence of its origin, a marker of a man-partaking which feeds a very popular now “cozy”, “sweet”, “personal” image. Authors also apply to other interesting features of hand-made aesthetic that are represented in the info-sphere such as therapy, “diet precepts”, etc. Th ey consider that handmade product is very signifi cant and represents individual and community identity, constructs and marks relations. Since handmade products usually are produced to be given as a gift , this moment is researched in the paper with references to classic and modern works on gift economy. Th e article contents research of actual in modern situation questions about communication and representation strategies. It is a part of the authors’ research of handmade project in modern Russian culture. Refs 9.

Keywords:

handmade, representation, personifi cation, uniqueness, gift -giving, gift, defect, stigma, communication

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Сурова Е. Э. Васильева М. А. Явление handmade: досуговый проект в современной культуре // Обсерватория культуры. 2015. № 6. С. 14–21.

Философия языка / ред.-сост. Дж. Р. Серл; пер. с англ. 2-е изд. М.: Едиториал УРСС 2010. 264 с.

Бодрийяр Ж. Система вещей. М.: Рудомино 1995. 222 с.

Goff man E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. NewYork: Prentice-Hall 1963. 320 p.

Сурова Е. Э. Идентичность. Идентификация. Образ. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та 2010. 268 c.

Мосс М. Очерк о даре // Мосс М. Общества. Обмен. Личность: Труды по социальной антропо логии. М.: Восточная литература РАН 1986. С. 85–111.

Белик А. А. Экономическая антропология в конце XX — начале XXI в.: экономика дара // Экономический журнал. 2013. Т. 29 вып. 1. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekonomicheskaya-antropologiya-v-kontse-xx-nachale-xxi-v-ekonomika-dara (дата обращения: 25.11.2015).

Weiner A. Inalienable Possessions: Paradox of Keeping-while-Giving. Berkeley 1992. 232 p.

Блог о рукоделии. URL: http://www.liveinternet.ru/tags/%E2%FF%E7%E0%ED%FB%E5+%EF%E8%F0%EE%E6%ED%FB%E5/ (дата обращения: 20.11.2015).

References

Surova E. E. Vasil’eva M. A.Iavlenie handmade: dosugovyi proekt v sovremennoi kul’ture [Phenomenon of handmade: leisure project in modern culture]. Observatoriia kul’tury [Observatory of Culture]2015 no. 6 pp. 14–21. (In Russian)

Filosofi ia iazyka [Th e philosophy of language]. Ed. by J. R. Searle. London Oxford University Press 1971. 264 p.

Bodriiiar Zh. Sistema veshchei [Th e System of Objects]. Moscow Rudomino Publ. 1995. 222 p. (In Russian)

Goff man E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York Prentice-Hall Publ. 1963. 320 p.

Surova E. E. Identichnost’. Identifi katsiia. Obraz [Identity. Identifi cation. Image]. St. Petersburg St. Petersburg University Press 2010. 268 p. (In Russian)

Moss M. Ocherk o dare [Essay on the gift ]. Moss M. Obshchestva. Obmen. Lichnost’: Trudy po sotsial’noi antropologii [Company. Exchange. Personality: Proceedings of Social Anthropology]. Moscow Eastern Literature RAS Publ.1986 pp. 85–111. (In Russian)

Belik A. A. Ekonomicheskaia antropologiia v kontse XX nachale XXI v.: ekonomika dara [Th e economic anthropology in the late 20th and early 21st centuries: the Economics of gift ]. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal [Journal of Economics]2013 vol. 29 no. 1. Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekonomicheskaya-antropologiya-v-kontse-xx-nachale-xxi-v-ekonomika-dara (accessed 25.11.2015).

Weiner A. Inalienable Possessions: Paradox of Keeping-while-Giving. Berkeley 1992. 232 p.

Blog o rukodelii [Blog about handmade]. Available at: http://www.liveinternet.ru/tags/%E2%FF%E7%E0%ED%FB%E5+%EF%E8%F0%EE%E6%ED%FB%E5/ (accessed 20.11.2015).

Published

2018-10-04

How to Cite

Сурова, Е. Э., & Васильева, М. А. (2018). REPRESENTATION OF NON-SERIALITY IN HANDMADE PRACTICEE. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 32(2), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.212