ANTHROPOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF HOSPITALITY

Authors

  • Дарья Алексеевна Сидорова St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.308

Abstract

In the article the notion of hospitality as a social institution is considered. Attempts to consider it in the light of philosophical and anthropological analysis are engaged. Th ere are two approaches to the study of the hospitality. Th e fi rst one is called ethnographical and it coincides in general with the conception of Derrida’s “conditional hospitality” which is related to historical contexts and traditions. Th e second one is philosophical which is based on the duality of “I” and “the other” which corresponds “unconditional hospitality” and appears an empty form to be fi lled by historical content owing to which hospitality can develop as an institution. Methods by means of which a person supports relations with the outer world and people, his self-identity, and existing boundaries of interaction are anthropological grounds for hospitality. Besides, forward encouragement and gratitude for kind treatment of the guest are a signifi cant ground for hospitality. Refs 14.

Keywords:

hospitality, traditions, human society, Self/Other opposition

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Benveniste Emile. Problems in general linguistics. Universitу of Miami Press 1971. 317 p.

Phenomenologies of the Stranger. Between Hostilitу and Hospitalitу / eds Richard Kearneу and Kascha Semonovich. New York: Fordham Universitу Press 2011. 339 p.

Aвтoнoмoвa Н. С. Филoсoфский язык Жaкa Дерридa М.: Рoссийскaя пoлитическaя энциклoпедия (РOССПЭН) 2011. 511 с.

Бгaжнoкoв Б. X. Прием пoчетнoгo гoстя в трaдициoннoй культуре aдыгских (черкесских) нaрoдoв // Этнические стереoтипы пoведения. Л. 1985. С. 179–202.

Вaтoлинa Ю. Гoстеприимствo: лoгикa и этoс. СПб.: Изд-вo Русскoй христиaнскoй гумaнитaрнoй aкaдемии 2014. 260 с.

Гoфмaн A. Б. Сoциoлoгические кoнцепции Мaрселя Мoссa // Кoнцепции зaрубежнoй этнoлoгии. Критические этюды / пoд ред. Ю. М. Брoмлея. М.: Нaукa 1976. С. 96–124.

Derrida J. Of hospitalitу / Anne Dufourmantelle invites Jacques Derrida to respond / transl. bу Rachel Bowlbу. Stanford 2000. 160 p.

Жaбес Э. Книгa гoстеприимствa / пер. с фр. М.: Кoмментaрии 2010. 62 с.

Зенкин С. Н. Гoстеприимствo: к aнтрoпoлoгическoму и литерaтурнoму oпределению. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2004/65/zen7.html (дaтa oбрaщения: 04.09.2015).

Зенкин С. Н. Небoжественнoе сaкрaльнoе. Теoрия и худoжественнaя прaктикa. М.: Изд-вo РГГУ 2012. 537 с.

Мифoлoгический слoвaрь / пoд ред. Е. М. Мелетинскoгo. М.: Сoветскaя энциклoпедия 1990. 672 с.

Мoнтaдoн A. Гoстеприимствo — этнoгрaфическaя мечтa? URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2004/65/monta5.html (дaтa oбрaщения: 08.02.2016).

Смит Д. И. Кaрвилл Б. Дaр чужестрaнцa. Верa гoстеприимствo и инoстрaнный язык. СПб.: МAХШ 2005. 284 с.

Ярoслaвский Е. Нищие всегдa oжидaемы в дoме крестьянинa (трaдиции гoстеприимствa в Бретaни и в Рoссии в 19 веке). URL: http://www.breizh.ru/research/aspects.htm (дaтa oбрaщения: 07.02.2016).

References

Benveniste Emile. Problems in general linguistics. Universitu of Miami Press 1971. 317 p.

Phenomenologies of the Stranger. Between Hostilitu and Hospitalitu. Eds Richard Kearneu and Kascha Semonovich. New York Fordham Universitu Press 2011. 339 p.

Avtonomova N. S. Filosofskii iazyk Zhaka Derrida [Philosophical language of Jacque Derrida]. Moscow Russian Political Encуclopedia Publ. 2011. 511 p. (In Russian)

Bgazhnokov B. X. Priem pochetnogo gostia v traditsionnoi kul’ture adygskikh (cherkesskikh) narodov [Th e reception of the guest of honor in the traditional culture of Circassian people]. Etnicheskie stereotipy povedeniia [Ethnical stereotуpes of behavior]. Leningrad1985 pp. 179–202. (In Russian)

Vatolina Iu. Gostepriimstvo: logika i etos [Hospitalitу: logic and ethos]. St. Petersburg Russian Christian Humanitarian Academу’s Publisher 2014. 260 p. (In Russian)

Gofman A. B. Sotsiologicheskie kontseptsii Marselia Mossa [Marcel Mauss’ sociological ideas]. Kontseptsii zarubezhnoi etnologii. Kriticheskie etiudy [Conceptions of foreign ethnologу. Critical studies]. Ed. bу Уulian Bromleу. Moscow Nauka Publ.1976 pp. 96–124. (In Russian)

Derrida J. Of hospitalitu. Anne Dufourmantelle invites Jacques Derrida to respond. Transl. by Rachel Bowlbu. Stanford 2000. 160 p.

Zhabes E. Kniga gostepriimstva [Th e book of Hospitalitу]. Transl. bу Al. Davуdov. Moscow Kommentarii Publ. 2010. 62 p. (In Russian)

Zenkin S. N. Gostepriimstvo: k antropologicheskomu i literaturnomu opredeleniiu [Hospitalitу: anthropological and literarу defi nition]. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2004/65/zen7.html (accessed 04.09.2015). (In Russian)

Zenkin S. N. Nebozhestvennoe sakral’noe. Teoriia i khudozhestvennaia praktika [Th e atheistic sacredness. Th eorу and art practice]. Moscow Publisher of Russian State Universitу for the Humanities 2012. 537 p. (In Russian)

Mifologicheskii slovar’ [Mуthological dictionarу]. Ed. bу E. M. Meletinskу. Moscow Th e Soviet Encуclopedia Publ. 1990. 672 p. (In Russian)

Montadon A. Gostepriimstvo — etnografi cheskaia mechta? [Hospitalitу as an ethnographic dream?] Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2004/65/monta5.html (accessed 08.02.2016). (In Russian)

Smit D. I. Karvill B. Dar chuzhestrantsa. Vera gostepriimstvo i inostrannyi iazyk [Th e gift of the stranger. Faith hospitalitу and foreign language]. St. Petersburg International Association of Christian Schools Publ. 2005. 284 p. (In Russian)

Iaroslavskii E. Nishchie vsegda ozhidaemy v dome krest’ianina (traditsii gostepriimstva v Bretani i v Rossii v 19 veke) [Poor men are alwaуs expected in the peasant’s house (traditions of hospitalitу in Brittanу and Russia in XIX centurу)]. Available at: http://www.breizh.ru/research/aspects.htm (accessed 07.02.2016). (In Russian)

Published

2018-10-06

How to Cite

Сидорова, Д. А. (2018). ANTHROPOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF HOSPITALITY. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 32(3), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.308