THE RELIGIOUS-PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ‘WITCHCRAFT’

Authors

  • Мария Сергеевна Бахтеева Th e State Museum of the History of Religion, 14/5, ul. Pochtamtskaya, St. Petersburg, 190000, Russian Federation;

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.313

Abstract

Th e article deals with the religious-philosophical foundations of ‘Witchcraft ’. Witchcraft is a mental phenomenon, a diverse thought-construct resulting from the intellectual understanding of such social phenomena as the witch-hunt in the unity of its diverse aspects. Th e focus of this paper is on the analysis of two key elements of witchcraft : the formation of the concept of evil in early Christian philosophy and its infl uence on the transformation of the witches’ image in the culture of the European Middle Ages. Th e origins of the understanding of evil as a metaphysical concept are traced back to ancient Greek philosophy. Th e article presents a brief analysis of the evolution of the concept of evil in the philosophical systems of Parmenides, Platon and Plotinus that had the greatest impact on the formation of ideas about evil in the Christian tradition. In Christianity, the question about the nature and the cause of evil becomes particularly critical and topical in the context of understanding God as Absolute, as ultimate authority bearing full responsibility for his creation. Th e philosophical heritage of Tertullian, Origen and Augustine made a signifi cant contribution to the development of the concept of evil. Th eir doctrine of evil became the impetus that provided witchcraft with a fundamental philosophical foundation and launched the process of transformation of the concept. Th e representation of witches acquired its logical completeness when the concept of witchcraft , aft er having gone through a long stage of its development, was defi ned by Christian theologians as heresy, characterized as the conscious denial of the established system of Christian values. A theologically articulated conception of the imperfection of women that originates from the interpretation of the fall of man by Christian theologians made an important contribution to the formation of the image of the witch. Th e very essence of the medieval world-view in which the fall of man was comprehended as a victory of the body over the spirit explained accusations made against the woman that she was the main culprit of original sin. And since the body was identifi ed with the woman and the spirit with the man, the woman was doomed to bear the main responsibility for sin in this system of values. Refs 13.

Keywords:

evil, Devil, Witch, Witchcraft, Witch-hunt

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Парменид // Фрагменты ранних греческих философов. М.: Наука 1989. Ч. 1. С. 274–298.

Платон. Государство // Платон. Собр. соч.: в 4 т. М.: Мысль 1993. Т. 3. С. 79–420.

Плотин. Первая Эннеада. СПб.: Изд-во О. Абышко 2004. 320 с.

Тертуллиан К. С. Ф. Избр. соч. М.: Прогресс 1994. 448 с.

Гинзбург К. Образ шабаша ведьм и его истоки // Одиссей. Человек в истории. М.: Наука 1990. С. 132–146.

Ориген. О началах. Самара: РА 1993. 317 c.

Августин Блаженный. О природе блага против манихеев // Церковные историки IV–V вв. М.: Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН) 2007. С. 76–84.

Блаженный Августин. О граде Божием: в 4 т. М.: Изд-во Спасо-Преображенского Валаамского монастыря 1994. Т. 3. 282 с.

Шпренгер Я. Инститорис Г. Молот ведьм. М.: Просвет 1992. 384 с.

Ле Гофф Ж. Трюон Н. История тела в средние века. М.: Текст 2008. 189 с.

Игина Ю. Ф. Ведовство и ведьмы в Англии: Антропология зла. СПб.: Алетейя 2009. 332 с.

История тела: в 3 т. Т. 1: От Ренессанса до эпохи Просвещения. М.: Новое литературное обозрение 2012. 480 с.

Гиффорд Дж. Диалог о ведьмах и колдовстве // Демонология эпохи Возрождения (XVI– XVII вв.). М.: Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН) 1995. С. 59–148.

References

Parmenid. Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh fi losofov. Ch. 1 [Th e Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: Th e Complete Fragments. Part 1]. Moscow Naurf Publ.1989 pp. 274–298. (In Russian)

Platon. Gosudarstvo [Th e Republic]. Platon. Sobr. soch.: v 4 t. T. 3 [Works in 4 vols. Vol. 3]. Moscow Mind Publ.1993 pp. 79–420. (In Russian)

Plotin. Pervaia Enneada [Th e fi rst Ennead]. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of O. Abyshko 2004. 320 p. (In Russian)

Tertullian K. S. F. Izbr. soch [Selected works of Tertullian]. Moscow: Progress Publ. 1994. 448 p. (In Russian)

Ginzburg K. Obraz shabasha ved’m i ego istoki [Th e image of the Sabbath and its genesis]. Odissei. Chelovek v istorii [Odysseus. Man in the History]. Moscow1990 pp. 132–146. (In Russian)

Origen. O nachalakh [On the basis]. Samara RA 1993. 317 p. (In Russian)

Avgustin Blazhennyi. O prirode blaga protiv manikheev [Concerning the Nature of Good Against the Manichaeans]. Tserkovnye istoriki IV–V vv. [Church historians IV–V centuries]. Moscow ROSSPEN2007 pp. 76–84. (In Russian)

Blazhennyi Avgustin. O grade Bozhiem: v 4 t. T. 3 [City of God: 22 books in 4 vols. Vol. 3]. Moscow Publishing house of Holy-Transfi guration Valaam Monastery 1994. 282 p. (In Russian)

Shprenger Ia. Institoris G. Molot ved’m [Th e Malleus Malefi carum]. Moscow Clear Publ. 1992. 384 p. (In Russian)

Le Goff Zh. Triuon N. Istoriia tela v srednie veka [Th e History of body in the Middle Ages]. Moscow Text Publ. 2008. 189 p. (In Russian)

Igina Iu. F. Vedovstvo i ved’my v Anglii: Antropologiia zla [Witchcraft and witches in England: anthropology of evil]. St. Petersburg Aletheia Publ. 2009. 332 p. (In Russian)

Istoriia tela: v 3 t. T. 1: Ot Renessansa do epokhi Prosveshcheniia [Th e History of body in 3 parts. P. 1: from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment]. Moscow New Literary Observer Publ. 2012. 480 p. (In Russian)

Giff ord Dzh. Dialog o ved’makh i koldovstve [Dialogue Concerning Witches and Witchcraft ]. Demonologiia epokhi Vozrozhdeniia (XVI–XVII vv.) [Demonology of the Renaissance (XVI–XVII centuries)]. Moscow1995 pp. 59–148. (In Russian)

Published

2018-10-07

How to Cite

Бахтеева, М. С. (2018). THE RELIGIOUS-PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ‘WITCHCRAFT’. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 32(3), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2016.313