THE ORIGIN OF SYMBOLICAL ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Сергей Витальевич Никоненко St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

Abstract

Th e matter of the article is to consider symbolical philosophy, especially symbolical realism. Th e Philosophy of empiricism infl uenced the romantic view on symbolic character of language. Heidegger’s view of ancient thought is the end of romantic symbolism. Contemporary study of symbols is realistic (Whitehead, Putnam, Ankersmit). Th ere is no general symbolical language. Symbol is a picture of an idea. It is like word and image; it does not have a strict meaning. Th e meaning of symbols is a metaphorical one. It is impossible to apply the analysis of concepts like the analysis of symbols. Th e more general a symbol is, the less it is interpretable in a logical or allegorical manner. Th ere is no universal symbolical system for all mankind.

Keywords:

philosophy, symbol, epistemology, language, metaphor, realism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература / References

Юм Д. Сочинения: в 2 т. Т. 1. М.: Мысль 1996. 678 с.

Кант И. Критика способности суждения. М.: Искусство 1991. 423 с.

Уайтхед А. Н. Символизм его смысл и воздействие. Томск: Водолей 1999. 92 с.

Дэвидсон Д. Истина и интерпретация. М.: Праксис 2004. 453 с.

Хайдеггер М. Время картины мира // Хайдеггер М. Время и бытие. М.: Республика 1993. С. 41–62.

Published

2018-11-22

How to Cite

Никоненко, С. В. (2018). THE ORIGIN OF SYMBOLICAL ANALYSIS. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 31(1), 39–43. Retrieved from https://philosophyjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/2901