TO THE QUESTION OF THE LIMITS OF PROGRESS: IS SINGULARITY POSSIBLE?

Authors

  • Ирина Григорьевна Шестакова Norwich University, VT, US, 158 harmon Drive Northfield, VT, US 05663

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.307

Abstract

This article explores the idea accepted in the social philosophy at the turn of 20th-21st century, that the exponential growth of the speed of progress results in the technological singularity. In natural science, the process characterized by initial exponential acceleration typically reaches a saturation phase and then develops according to another mathematical low. This does not mean to imply that the initial phase continues uninterruptedly, but may indeed consist of early outflows to the saturation phase and transition to plateaus of speed. If such a description is typical in natural science, would not predictions for science and technology, in general, be characterized by perhaps not apocalyptic conclusions but the appearance of such singularities? Would it not be expected from processes in natural science that the acceleration of scientific progress might be replaced by deceleration and a complete stoppage of acceleration? Mechanisms for retarding acceleration of info-communications are revealed in the adaptive capabilities of individual approaching planning horizons, and specifically in the investment in the military-industrial complex, which has its own logic representing a direct driving force for progress in the civil sphere. At the same time, despite possible dampening of acceleration of progress in science and technology, progress itself and social transformations will not stop, and will not even slow down, but continue with the speed, which will become permanent.

Keywords:

social philosophy, scientific and technical progress, infocommunication, development speed, planning horizon, exponent, singularity, determinism, limits of progress

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература/References

Shestakova I. G. Analiz sovremennykh tendentsii nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa i gorizonty planirovaniia [Analysis of Current Trends in Scientific and Technical Progress and the Horizons of Planning]. Ekonomika i ekologicheskii menedzhment , 2013, no.1, pp. 67–79. (In Russian)

Kurzweil R. The Singularity is Near . New York: Viking Books, 2005. 652 p.

Vindzh V. Technological Singularity . Available at: https://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/~hpm/book98/com.ch1/vinge.singularity.html (accessed: 02.01.2014).

Kutyrev V. A. Vremia Mortido [The Time of Mortido (in the middle of the Body of Thought)] . St. Petersburg, Aleteiia, 2012. 336 p. (In Russian)

Kutyrev V. A. Chelovecheskoe i inoe: bor’ba mirov [Human and other: the struggle of the worlds] . St. Petersburg, Aleteiia, 2009. 264 p. (In Russian)

Panov A. D. Tekhnologicheskaia singuliarnost’, teorema Penrouza ob iskusstvennom intellekte i kvantovaia priroda soznaniia [Technology singularity, Penrose’s theorem on artificial intelligence and the quan¬tum nature of consciousness]. Metafizika , 2013, no. 3, pp. 141–188. (In Russian)

Shestakova I. G. Neogranichennoe nauchno-tekhnicheskoe razvitie i ego fundamental’nye predely [Unlimited scientific and technical development and its fundamental limits]. XXI vek: itogi proshlogo i problemy nastoiashchego plius , 2014, no. 4, pp. 47–51. (In Russian)

Laplace P.-S. Essai philosophique sur les probabilités . Paris, Bachelier, 1840. 294 p. (In French)

Malthus T. R. An Essay on the Principle of Population, (1798). Available at: http://www.econlib.org/library/Malthus/malPop.html (accessed: 23.12.2015).

Hegel G. Lektsii po filosofii istorii [Lectures on the philosophy of history] . St. Petersburg, Nauka, 1993. 480 p. (In Russian)

Kont O. Kurs polozhitel’noi filosofii [Course of positive philosophy] . Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, Knizhnyi magazin Tovarishchestva “Posrednik”, 1900. 176 p. (In Russian)

Lenin V. I. Tri istochnika i tri sostavnykh chasti marksizma [Three Sources and Three Components of Marxism]. Lenin V. I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Collected works] , vol. 23, Moscow, Nauka, 1967, pp. 44–52. (In Russian)

Marx K., Engels F. Feierbakh. Protivopolozhnost’ materialisticheskogo i idealisticheskogo vozzrenii [Feuerbach. Opposition of the Materialist and Idealist Outlook] . Moscow, Progress Publ., 1966, pp. 51–52. (In Russian)

Mechnikov L. Tsivilizatsiia i velikie istoricheskie reki [Civilization and the great historical rivers] . Moscow, Pangeia, 1995. 461 p. (In Russian)

Montesquieu S. O dukhe zakonov [On the spirit of laws] . Moscow, Mysl’, 2011. 800 p. (In Russian)

Panarin V. I. Ritmy obshchestvennogo razvitiia i perekhod k postmodernu [Rhythms of Social Development and the Transition to Postmodern]. Voprosy filosofii , 1998, no. 8, pp. 24–40. (In Russian)

Engels F. Anti-Duhring. Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniia [Collected works] , vol. 20. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1961, pp. 10–44. (In Russian)

Rabbit Problems in Australia. Available at: http://www.animalcontrol.com.au/rabbit.htm (accessed: 23.12.2016).

Invazivnye chuzherodnye vidy: obzor rabot po invazivnym chuzherodnym vidam i soobrazheniia kasatel’no dal’neishei raboty [Invasive alien species: review of invasive alien species and considerations for future work]. Konferentsiia storon konventsii o biologicheskom raznoobrazii. Pkhenchkhan, Respublika Koreia, 6–17 oktiabria 2014 goda [The Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea, 6–17 octobre 2014] . Available at: https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-12/cop-12-dec-17-ru.doc (accessed: 23.12.2016). (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2018-12-07

How to Cite

Шестакова, И. Г. (2018). TO THE QUESTION OF THE LIMITS OF PROGRESS: IS SINGULARITY POSSIBLE?. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 34(3), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2018.307

Issue

Vol. 34 No. 3 (2018): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.