Romanticism vs. Enlightenment?

Authors

  • Юрий Леонидович Аркан St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
  • Екатерина Игоревна Наумова St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

Abstract

The article presents an attempt to reveal the relation between philosophical positions of the Romanticism and Enlightenment. The novelty of the research is that the Enlightenment, namely Kant’s philosophy, is not considered within a frame of the contradictory logic opposed to the Romanticism. According the authors` interpretation, Kantian notion of the Enlightenment created the ground to overthrow the scientific ideal of knowledge as the reference to all kinds of human cognitive activity. Insofar as the new European “rationality” was identifi ed previously with the “scientific” mode, Kant’s philosophy “opened the door” to allow the nonrational and irrational knowledge. However, the major difference between the Romanticism and philosophy of the Enlightenment concerns the notion of “subjectivity.” Romantic subject is an individual unique personality following the “categorical imperative of genius”, which replaces the faceless subject of the universal morality of the Enlightenment.

Keywords:

Enlightenment, romanticism, rationality, irrationality, artist, genius

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература / References

Мангейм К. Диагноз нашего времени. М.: Юрист 1994. 693 с.

Руссо Ж.-Ж. Об общественном договоре или Принципы политического права // Руссо Ж.-Ж. Трактаты. М. 1969.

Руссо Ж.-Ж. Фрагменты и наброски // Руссо Ж.-Ж. Трактаты. М. 1969.

Кант И. Основы метафизики нравственности // Кант И. Сочинения: в 6 т. Т. 4. Ч. 1. М.: Мысль 1965. 544 с.

Зиммель Г. Кант // Зиммель Г. Избранное: в 2 т. Т. 1. М. 1996. С. 7–157.

Published

2018-12-10

How to Cite

Аркан, Ю. Л., & Наумова, Е. И. (2018). Romanticism vs. Enlightenment?. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 29(2), 70–74. Retrieved from https://philosophyjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/3216