Philosophy as de-anthropologized knowledge: a contribution of Russian empiriocriticism

Александр Рыбас

doi:10.21638/spbu17.2019.109

Authors

Александр Рыбас St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.109

Abstract

The article provides an analysis of the “problem” approach to understanding a human being. This approach was a characteristic feature of the followers of empiriocriticism in Russia at the turn of the 20th century. It is shown that this approach suggests the possibility of a procedural understanding of the objectness of philosophical knowledge which in turn requires the metaphysical rationality to be critically overcome. Russian positivism is discussed by means of analyzing the two main “irritants” of the philosophical tradition: antimetaphysical pathos and a new model of knowledge. Metaphysics, as an object of criticism of the Russian positivists, was considered to be a special strategy of comprehending absolute truth, or such a system of knowledge that was based on ignorance, that is, on a whole series of assumptions accepted on faith and never verified. It is shown that the criticism of metaphysics led the empiriocritics to develop their own alternative projects to prove the possibility of monistic philosophy. The most interesting experiments of constructing a system of “non-metaphysical all-unity” were the theories of empiriomonism and tektology of Aleksandr Bogdanov, scientific philosophy of Vladimir Lesevich, empiriosymbolism of Pavel Yushkevich, philosophy of life of Sergey Suvorov, as well as positive aesthetics of Aleksandr Lunacharsky. These theories are considered in the context of modelling a system of new, non-classical, or de-anthropologized, philosophical knowledge. The problem of man is described by means of both destruction and actualization of its main historical interpretations. The thesis of the Russian positivists that philosophy can exist only in the form of a historico-philosophical discourse which is held to create a possible reality rather than to reconstruct the existing philosophical doctrines is corroborated.

Keywords:

Russian philosophy, empiriocriticism, positivism, problem of man, subject, destruction of subjectivity, constructing a man, de-anthropologized knowledge

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References/ Литература

Steila, D. (2013), Nauka i revoliutsiia. Retseptsiia empiriokrititsizma v russkoi kul’ture (1877–1910) [Science and Revolution: A Reception of Empirio-criticism in the Russian Culture (1877–1910)], transl. from Italian by О. Popova, Akademicheskii Proekt Publ., Мoscow, Russia.

Soboleva, M. Е. (2018), “‘Kriticheskii pozitivizm’ protiv ‘novogo idealizma’ v Rossii nachala XX veka” [“Critical positivism” versus “new idealism” in Russia at the beginning of 20th century], Vestnik SPbGU. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, vol. 34, iss. 1, pp. 46–56.

Gusev, S. S. (1995), “Paradoks pozitivizma” [The paradox of positivism], in Zamaleev, A. F. and Novikov, A. I. (eds), Russkii pozitivizm: V. V. Lesevich, P. S. Iushkevich, A. A. Bogdanov [Russian positivism: V. V. Lesevich, P. S. Yushkevich, A. A. Bogdanov], Nauka, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 5–14.

Mikhailova, E. E. and Belchevichen, S. P. (2012), Pozitivizm i marksizm v Rossii: Problema sotsiokul’turnogo razvitiia [Positivism and Marxism in Russia: The problem of socio-cultural development], Tver branch of the Moscow Institute of Humanities and Economics, Tver, Russia.

Korobkova, S. N. (2014), “Stsientizm kak forma filosofskoi refleksii” [Scientism as a form of philosophical reflection], in Antokhin, Iu. A., ed., Nauchnaia sessiia GUAP. Sbornik dokladov, posviashchennykh Vsemirnomu Dniu aviatsii i kosmonavtiki [Scientific session of the SUAI. Collection of reports dedicated to the World Day of Aviation and Cosmonautics], in 3 pt., pt. 1, St. Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 70–73.

Lesevich, V. V. (2011), Chto takoe nauchnaia filosofiia? [What is scientific philosophy?], Direct-Media, Moscow, Russia.

Lesevich, V. V. (1995), “Pervye provozvestniki pozitivizma” [The first heralds of positivism], in Zamaleev, A. F. and Novikov, A. I., eds, Russkii pozitivizm: V. V. Lesevich, P. S. Iushkevich, A. A. Bogdanov [Russian positivism: V. V. Lesevich, P. S. Yushkevich, A. A. Bogdanov], Nauka, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 55–106.

Bogdanov, A. A. (2010), Padenie velikogo fetishizma: Sovremennyi krizis ideologii [The fall of the great fetishism: The current crisis of ideology], Кrasand, Moscow, Russia.

Bogdanov, A. A. (2003), Empiriomonizm: Stat’i po filosofii [Empiriomonism: Philosophy articles], Respublika, Moscow, Russia.

Plaggenborg, S. (2008), “Alexander Bogdanov: Vom Marxismus zur Anthropologie”, in Alexander Bogdanov. Theoretiker fur das 20. Jahrhundert, Verlag Otto Sagner, Munchen, Germany, pp. 179–197.

Soboleva, M. (2007), A. Bogdanov und der philosophische Diskurs in Russland zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts. Zur Geschichte des russischen Positivismus, Georg Olms Verlag, Hildesheim, Germany.

Yushkevich, P. S. (1995), “Sovremennaia energetika s tochki zreniia empiriosimvolizma” [Modern energetics in the terms of empiriosymbolism], in Zamaleev, A. F. and Novikov, A. I., eds, Russkii pozitivizm:V. V. Lesevich, P. S. Iushkevich, A. A. Bogdanov [Russian positivism: V. V. Lesevich, P. S. Yushkevich,A. A. Bogdanov], Nauka, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 107–164.

Bogdanov, A. A. (1989), Tektologiia: Vseobshchaia organizatsionnaia nauka [Tectology: General organizational science], Ekonomika Publ., Moscow, Russia.

Suvorov, S. (1905), “Osnovy filosofii zhizni” [Foundations of the philosophy of life], in Dorovatovskii, S. and Charushnikov, A., eds Ocherki realisticheskogo mirovozzreniia: Sbornik statei po filosofii, obshchestvennoi nauke i zhizni [Essays on the realistic worldview: A collection of articles on philosophy, social science and life], 2nd ed., Tipografiia Montvida, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 1–113.

Lunacharskii, A. V. (1905) “Osnovy pozitivnoi estetiki” [Foundations of positive aesthetics], in Dorovatovskii, S. and Charushnikov, A., eds Ocherki realisticheskogo mirovozzreniia: Sbornik statei po filosofii, obshchestvennoi nauke i zhizni [Essays on the realistic worldview: A collection of articles on philosophy, social science and life], 2nd ed., Tipografiia Montvida, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 114–182.

Mikhailova, E. E. (2009), “Russkii pozitivizm na puti ponimaniia cheloveka, ego kul’tury i istorii” [Russian positivism on the way of understanding man, his culture and history], Filosofiia i kul’tura [Philosophy and culture], no. 7 (19), pp. 55–61.

Gusev, S. S., Efimov, Iu. I. and Mangasaryan, V. N. (2009), Problema cheloveka v filosofii i sovremennoi nauke [The problem of man in philosophy and modern science], Izdatel’stvo RHGA, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Nietzsche, F. (1990), “Veselaia nauka” [The merry science (‘La gaya scienza’)], in Nietzsche, F. Sochineniia [Works], in 2 vol., vol. 1, Мysl, Мoscow, Russia, pp. 491–719.

Brodsky, A. I. and Rybas, A. E. (2013), Proekty Serebrianogo veka. Filosofskie idei russkogo moderna [Silver Age projects. Philosophical ideas of Russian art nouveau], Izdatel’stvo SPbGU, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Nietzsche, F. (2005), Volia k vlasti. Opyt pereotsenki vsekh tsennostei [The will to power. An attempted revaluation of all values], Kul’turnaia revoliutsiia Publ., Moscow, Russia.

Ukhtomskii, A. A. (1997), Zasluzhennyi sobesednik: etika, religiia, nauka [The honoured interlocutor: ethics, religion, science], Rybinskoe podvor’e, Rybinsk, Russia.

Bakhtin, M. M. (2003), “K filosofii postupka” [To the philosophy of action], in Bakhtin, M. M. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works], in 7 vols., vol. 1, Philosophical aesthetics of the 1920s, Russkie slovari, Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury, Moscow, Russia.

Soboleva, M. E. (2012), “Bor’’ba za istinnyi marksizm. Bogdanovskaia interpretatsiia monizma Spinozy” [The struggle for the true Marxism. Bogdanov’s interpretation of Spinoza’s monism], Veche. Zhurnal russkoi filosofii i kul’tury, vol. 24, pp. 137–147.

Marx, K. (1955), “ Tezisy o Feierbakhe” [Theses on Feuerbach], in Marx, K. and Engels, F. Sochineniia [Works], vol. 3, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury, Мoscow, Russia.

Vvedenskii, A. I. (1892), O predelakh i priznakakh odushevleniia: Novyi psikhofizicheskii zakon v sviazi s voprosom o vozmozhnosti metafiziki [On the bounds and signs of animation: New psychophysical law in connection with the question of the possibility of metaphysics], Tipografiia V. S. Balasheva, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Vvedenskii, A. I. (1996), Stat’i po filosofii [Philosophy articles], Izdatel’stvo SPbGU, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Vernadskii, V. I. (1991), Nauchnaia mysl’ kak planetnoe iavlenie [Scientific thought as a planetary phenomenon], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.

Bogdanov, A. A. (1990), “Novyi mir” [The new world], in Bogdanov, A. A. Voprosy sotsializma: Raboty raznykh let [Problems of socialism: Works of different years], Politizdat, Moscow, Russia.

Bogdanov, A. A. (2010), Filosofiia zhivogo opyta: Materializm, empiriokrititsizm, dialekticheskii materializm, empiriomonizm, nauka budushchego. Populiarnyye ocherki [The philosophy of living experience: Materialism, empiriocriticism, dialectical materialism, empiriomonism, the science of the future. Popular essays], URSS Publ., Мoscow, Russia.

Yushkevich, P. S. (2011), Mirovozzrenie i mirovozzreniia: Ocherki i kharakteristiki [Worldview and worldviews: Essays and characteristics], Librokom, Мoscow, Russia.