Sexuality in the networks of discourse: from Freud to Foucault

Authors

  • Вячеслав Михайлович Литвинский St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.114

Abstract

The article is devoted to the topic which relevance is determined by the socio-cultural revolution that from the beginning of the 20th century catchеd the family — the most fundamental institution of society as such and the only social institution of human reproduction. The author turns to the study of the phenomenon of sexuality in the Foucault’s project of “History of Sexuality” in those aspects that are associated with the reception of Freud’s legacy by Foucault’s philosophical thinking, favorably differing from the “return to Freud”, programs formulated by J. Lacan and J. Laplanche. The “genealogical method” of Foucault gave the historical study of sexuality a philosophically grounded character. Responding to Foucault’s appeal to translate sexuality into discourse, the author  of the article considers discourse and discursive practices as an instrument of historical research, shows the complexity of the study of sexuality, based on the urgency of the present, is determined by the ordinary non-intelligible assimilation and use of language: the desire for social recognition, the psychological temptation of simplicity of attitudes agreement and denial, the intentional indefiniteness of possessive pronouns, sounded in the voice and masked by the text. The idea of discourse, anthropological practices that unite the language with the specific circumstances of its use, serve as a fruitful cognitive tool for historical research. Psychoanalytic philosophical anthropology, or metapsychology, is not only a way of thinking, that revolutionized humanitarian knowledge in the 20th century, but is also implicitly associated with the figure of the psychoanalyst as a conceptual character whose attitude to the client’s language serves as a paradigm for exploring discourse practices in their historical existence and development. The reference to the conceptual interrelationship between Freud’s metapsychology and Foucault’s philosophy opens the prospects for a concrete study of sexuality in the context of traditional family values, the family as a mechanism for the reproduction of man and society.

Keywords:

psychoanalysis, sexuality, discourse, language, attitude to language, Freud, Foucault

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Vleminick J. de, Dorfman E. (eds) Sexuality and Psychoanalisis. Philosophical Critisism. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2010. 240 p.

Марков Б. В. Философская антропология: учебное пособие. 2-е изд., СПб.: Питер, 2008, 352 с.

Wrobel Sz. Foucault Reads Freud: The Dialogue with Unreason and Enlightenment // Polish Sociological Review. 2010. No. 171. P. 271–288.

Литвинский В. М. На пороге новой антропологии // Лапланш Ж. Жизнь и смерть в психоанализе. СПб.: Владимир Даль, 2011. С. 5–56.

Фуко М. История безумия в классическую эпоху. СПб.: Университетская книга, 1997. 576 c.

Фуко М. Воля к истине. По ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. М.: Касталь, 1996. 448 c.

Foucault M. Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings. 1972–1977 / ed. By C. Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980. 282 p.

Сартр Ж.-П. Идиот в семье. Гюстав Флобер от 1821 до 1857. СПб.: Алетейя, 1998. 648 с.

Вен П. Как пишут историю. Опыт эпистемологии. Приложение: Фуко совершает переворот в истории. М.: Научный мир, 2003. 394 с.

Чехов М. А. Путь актера: Жизнь и встречи. М.: ACT, 2007. 554 c.

References

Vleminick de, J. and Dorfman E (2010), Sexuality and Psychoanalisis. Philosophical Critisism, Leuven University Press, Leuven, Belgium.

Markov, B. V. (2008) Filosofskaia antropologiia. Uchebnoe posobie [Philosophical anthropology. Manual], Piter Publ., St. Petersburg, Russia.

Wrobel Sz. (2010), “Foucault Reads Freud: The Dialogue with Unreason and Enlightenmen”, Polish Sociological Review, no. 171, pp. 271–288.

Litvinskiy, V. M. (2011), “Na poroge novoi antropologii” [On the threshold of a new anthropology],

in Laplanshe, J. Zhizn’ i smert’ v psikhoanalize [Life and death in psychoanalysis], transl. by Bystrov V. Ju., Vladimir Dal’ Publ., St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 5–56

Foucault, M. (1997), Istoriia bezumiia v klassicheskuiu epokhu [History of Madness in the Classical Age], transl. by Staf I. К., Universitetskaia kniga Publ., St. Petersburg, Russia.

Foucault, M. (1998), Volia k istine. Po tu storonu znaniia, vlasti i seksual’nosti [Will to truth. Beyond Knowledge, Power and Sexuality], transl. by Tabachnikova Sv., Kastal Publ., Moscow, Russia.

Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings. 1972–1977, ed. By C. Gordon, Pantheon Books, New York, NY, USA.

Sartre, J.-P. (1998), Idiot v sem’e. Giustav Flober ot 1821 do 1857 [The family idiot. Gustave Flaubert from 1821 to 1857], transl. by Plekhanov E., Aleteiia Publ., St. Petersburg, Russia.

Veyne, P.-M. (2003), Kak pishut istoriiu. Opyt epistemologii. Prilozhenie: Fuko sovershaet perevorot v istorii [Writing history. Essay on epistemology. Appendix: Foucault makes a revolution in history], transl. by Torchinskij L. A., Nauchnyi mir Publ., Moscow, Russia.

Chekhov, M. A. (2007), Put’ aktera: Zhizn’ i vstrechi [The path of the actor. Life and meetings], AST Publ., Moscow, Russia.

Published

2019-03-29

How to Cite

Литвинский, В. М. (2019). Sexuality in the networks of discourse: from Freud to Foucault. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 35(1), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.114