The problem of moral choice in political ethics

Authors

  • Evgenii V. Derzhivitski
  • Igor Yu. Larionov St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.302

Abstract

In this paper, we identify and describe the particular characteristics of moral choice in political ethics. For that purpose, the main features of political ethics as applied ethics, as well as its difference from other areas of applied ethics, are revealed. We describe the method and the limits of interpretation of political ethics as professional ethics. We come to the conclusion that in some cases of political choice we cannot appeal to norms and principles of public morality. The reasons are the ineradicable properties and goals of political activity—that is, its significant impact on the welfare and lives of citizens of the state, a high degree of risk and uncertainty, and the continuous presence of open ethical questions. On that ground, we argue that in the case of moral choice political ethics should analyze each situation separately, since any attempt to create universal prescriptions and recommendations would inevitably fail as inappropriate. Hereafter, we propose the typology of ethical conflicts typical for political practice. The first type is the moral conflict caused by the necessity of political compromise that presupposes breaking previous promises. The second type is proper moral dilemmas that include the choice between life and death of other people. The third type presents the choice between some historically significant goals and the personal political career of a politician. In the discussion, we will provide real-life examples for each type of political moral conflict. The main research methods of the paper are categorical analysis of ethical concepts, comparative analysis, cultural-historical method, analysis of moral dilemmas, event analysis, political-psychological method, method of political-cultural comparative studies, and content analysis.

Keywords:

political ethics, moral conflict, moral choice in politics, compromise, lies in politics, moral motivation of politicians, the responsibility of politicians, political suicide

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References

1. Fott, D. (2014), Marcus Tullius Cicero, “On the Republic” and “On the Laws”, trans. by Fott, D., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 377 p.

2. Sutor, B. (2001), The little political ethics, in Political and economic ethics, FAIR-Press Publ., Moscow, pp. 27–174. (In Russian)

3. Walzer, M. (1973), Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 160–180.

4. Williams, B. (1981), Politics and moral character, in Williams, B. Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–70.

5. Kapustin, B. G. (2004), The moral politics and the political morality. Preface, in Kapustin, B. G. (ed.), Moral’ v politike. Khrestomatiia, MSU Publ., Moscow, pp. 3–38. (In Russian)

6. Ankersmit, F. R. (2002), Political Representation, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 266 p.

7. Edmonds, D. (2014), Would You Kill the Fat Man?: The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us about Right and Wrong, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 240 p.

8. Thomson, J. J. (1985), The Trolley Problem, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 1395–1415.

9. Lemmon, E. J. (1962), Moral Dilemmas, The Philosophical Review, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 139–158.

10. De Klerk, F. W. (1999), The Last Trek — A New Beginning. The Autobiography, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 412 p.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

How to Cite

Derzhivitski, E. V. ., & Larionov, I. Y. (2019). The problem of moral choice in political ethics. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 35(3), 406–416. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.302

Issue

Vol. 35 No. 3 (2019): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.