The origins of Platonic pedagogy: an introduction to the study of Minor Plato’s dialogues

Vladimir V. Prokopenko

doi:10.21638/spbu17.2019.309

Authors

Vladimir V. Prokopenko V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 6, pl. Svobody, 61022, Kharkiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2019.309

Abstract

The article deals with the question of the ideological content of Plato’s “minor” dialogues and their significance for understanding Plato’s philosophy. The author sees his goal in showing that the traditionally low assessment of these works by Plato is unfair. Thus, the article provides analysis of the “minor” dialogues in terms of their role in the implementation of Plato’s educational strategies. Plato is affirmed never to separate the problems of philosophy and education because philosophy itself was understood by Plato as the education of the soul. The article proposes to consider “Minor Plato’s” dialogues as part of the Corpus Platonicum regardless of the solution to chronology and authenticity problems, since these dialogues in one way or another belong to the heritage of the Academy. The article analyzes two dialogues, Clitophon and Theages which are still little studied in Russian literature. The connections between the considered dialogues and the great works of Plato — Republic, Symposium, and Theaetetus —are revealed. The author comes to the conclusion that the relationship between these dialogues should be viewed as a “challenge-response” relationship in which the dialogues’ back-andforth occurs. It has been established that not only do Plato’s major dialogues contain answers to questions posed in Minor Plato’s dialogues, but, conversely, Clitophon and Theages become keys to understanding Symposium and Theaetetus. The article proves that Plato made this dialogues back-and-forth in order to achieve better understanding of his philosophical ideas by students.

Keywords:

Plato Minor, pedagogic approach, dialogues roll-call, erotosophy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

References

1. Jaeger, W. (1947), Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture, vol. 2, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 461 p.

2. Guthrie, W. K. C. (1975), A History of Greek Philosophy, in 6 vols, vol. 4, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 624 p.

3. Irwin, T. (1995), Plato`s Ethics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 464 p.

4. Plato (1986), Dialogi [Dialogues], ed. by Losev, A. F., Mysl’ Publ., Moscow, 607 p. (In Russian)

5. Kanto-Sperber, M. (2006), Plato, in Grecheskaya filosofiya, vol. 1, Greko-latinskii kabinet Yu. A. Shichalina Publ., Moscow, pp. 204–332. (In Russian)

6. Shichalin, Yu. A. (2015), Plato: from Socrates to the presocratics?, Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Ser. I: Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies, vol. 2, no. 58, pp. 27–42. (In Russian)

7. Vlastos, G. (1991), Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 334 p.

8. Vasil’ eva, T. V. (2008), The Way to Plato, in Vasil’ eva, T. V., Poetika antichnoy filosofii, Akademicheskii proekt Publ.; Triksta Publ., Moscow, pp. 217–397. (In Russian)

9. Thesleff, H. (1982), Studies in Platonic Chronology, Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Helsink, 283 p.

10. Alieva, O. V. (2012), “Socratics” and Λογος προτρεπτικος in IV cent. B. C., Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Ser. I: Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies, vol. 3, no. 41, pp. 105–114. (In Russian)

11. Bowe, G. S. (2007), In Defense of Clitophon, Classical Philology, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 245–264.

12. Davis, M. (1998), On the Intention of Plato’s Clitophon, Mètis: Anthropologie Des Mondes Grecs Anciens, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 271–285.

13. Kremer, M. (2004), Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind, Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, 100 p.

14. Orwin, C. (1987), On Cleitophont, in Pangle, T. (ed) The Roots of Political Philosophy. Ten Forgotten Socratic Dialogues, transl, with interpretive essays, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, NY, pp. 111–131.

15. Slings, S. R. (ed.) (2004), Plato: Clitophon, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 380 p.

16. Roochnik, D. L. (1984), The Riddle of Cleitophon, Ancient Philosophy, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 132–145.

17. Taylor, A. E. (1926), Plato. The Man and His Work, Methuen & Co LTD., London, 536 p.

18. Nails, D. (2002), The people of Plato: a prosopography of Plato and other Socratics, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, 464 p.

19. Plato (1997), Clitophon, in Cooper, J. M. and Huthinson, D. S. (eds), Plato. Complete works, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, pp. 965–971.

20. Plato (2008), The Symposium, Howatson, M. C. and Sheffield, F. C. C. (eds), transl. by Howatson,M. C., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 128 p.

21. Burnet, J. (1950), Greek Philosophy. Thales to Plato, Macmillan and Co. Ltd, London, 360 p.

22. Solov’ev, V. S. (1899), Reasoning on Theages, in Tvoreniia Platona, vol. 1, K. T. Soldatenkov Publ., Moscow, pp. 47–62. (In Russian)

23. Pangle, T. (1987), On the Theages, in Pangle, T. (ed.), The Roots of Political Philosophy. Ten Forgotten Socratic Dialogues, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, NY, pp. 147–175.

24. Benardete, S. (1953), The Daimonion of Socrates: A Study of Plato`s Theages: a dissertation submitted to the faculty of the division of the social sciences in candidacy for the degree of master of arts, Chicago University, Chicago, IL, 44 p.

25. Xenophon, Memorabilia (1994), transl. by Bonnette, A. L., Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, NY, 171 p.

26. Plato (1997), “Theages”, in Cooper J. M. and Huthinson D. S. (eds), Plato. Complete works, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, pp. 627–639.