Pavel Florensky and “inactive effort”. Philosophy of religion as a source of concepts for epistemology

Authors

  • Jakub Mach University of Warsaw, 16, 3/11, ul. Bonifraterska, Warsaw, 00-203, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.108

Abstract

Pavel Florensky in “The Pillar and Ground of the Truth: An Essay in Orthodox Theodicy in Twelve Letters” in “Letter Two: Doubt” describes the complex epistemic structure of religious experience. The article shows that the central element of this structure is the act of “inactive effort”, which does not give a clear result, but gives rise to a “tone of hope” in the mind of the subject, the expectation of discovering the possibilities of comprehending the object, which
cannot be obtained in the way of the usual rational method of cognition. According to the thoughts of Florensky, the presence of such an act is due to the fact that the object of religious experience (in this case, dogmas) is beyond what is possible for rational cognition, and nevertheless it must be somehow captured and expressed by this cognition. As a result of the analysis of Florensky’s text, the article formulates an epistemological model of cognitive acts of this kind, which require great effort from the cognitive, but at the same time are devoid of any signs of action. In addition to the subject of cognition and its object, the structure of such an act contains a third element, the “tone of hope,” which allows the act of cognition carried out by the intellect to go beyond the intellect into the realm of transcendental. This model, obtained in the analysis of religious experience, may be useful for describing some cognitive events that are not related to religion. For example, in a situation where the conditions of cognition do not allow for obtaining a reliable result, but the subject continues to carry out cognitive acts according to the model of “inactive effort”, and suddenly, without sufficient reason, receives knowledge that exceeds all expectations. This opens up the possibility of significantly expanding the problem field of epistemology. 

Keywords:

P. Florensky, philosophy of religion, epistemology, cognitive act, inactive effort

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

1. Mach J. Epistemologiczne znaczenie filozoficznych konceptualizacji doświadczenia religijnego// Epistemologia doświadczenia religijnego w XX-wiecznej filozofii rosyjskiej i żydowskiej / red.J. Dobieszewski, S. Krajewski, J. Mach. Kraków: TAiWPN Universitas, 2018. S. 50–61.

2. Флоренский П. А. Столп и утверждение истины: Опыт православной теодицеи. М.: ACT, 2003. 640 c.

3. Мах Я. От философии религии до эпистемологии // Религия и познание. Эпистемология религиозного опыта в русской и еврейской мысли ХХ века / под ред. Я. Добешевски, С. Краевски, Я. Маха. Warszawa: Uniwersytat Warszawski, Wydzial Filozofii, 2018. С. 69–78.

4. Булгаков С. Н. Свет невечерний: Созерцания и умозрения. М.: Республика, 1994. 415 с.

References

1. Mach, J. (2018), “Epistemological significance of the philosophical conceptualization of religious experience”, in Dobieszewski, J., Krajewski, S., Mach, J. (eds) Epistemologia doświadczenia religijnego w 20-wiecznej filozofii rosyjskiej i żydowskiej, TAiWPN Universitas, Krakow, pp. 50–61.

2. Florensky, P. A. (2003), The Pillar and Ground of the Truth: An Essay in Orthodox Theodicy, AST Publ., Moscow, 640 p.(In Russian)

3. Mach, J. (2018), “From the philosophy of religion to epistemology”, in Dobieszewski, J., Krajewski, S., Mach, J. (eds) Religiya i poznanie. Epistemologiia religioznogo opyta v russkoi i evreiskoi mysli 20 veka, University of Warsaw, Institute of Philosophy, Warsaw, pp. 69–78. (In Russian)

4. Bulgakov, S. N. (1994), Unfading Light. Contemplations and speculations, Respublika Publ., Moscow, 415 p. (In Russian)

Published

2020-03-31

How to Cite

Mach, J. (2020). Pavel Florensky and “inactive effort”. Philosophy of religion as a source of concepts for epistemology. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 36(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.108