Invention of the future in project-time. An imaginary “encounter” between Georg Simmel and Henri Bergson, and its significance for architecture

Authors

  • Petar Bojanić University of Belgrade, 45, ul. Kraljice Natalije, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia
  • Ekaterina S. Cherepanova Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, 51, pr. Lenina, Ekaterinburg, 620083, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.111

Abstract

The article addresses the reconstructed dialogue with the texts of G. Simmel (G. Simmel “Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung”; “Überräumliche Projekten sozialer Formen”) and H. Bergson (H. Bergson “Histoire de l’idée de temps”) in order to analyze the question of how the design/creation of the future was understood by these philosophers, and how this question can be interpreted today. We would like to present some conditions and difficulties in revealing the future and the temporal nature of any project. First, we would like to insist on a weakness in languages spoken by a great number of people, which is that the future is difficult to linguistically stabilize and document: German and English do not have a future tense, using instead auxiliary verbs, “werden” (to become), “will”/be going to”. The study of the project as an intellectual (intention, idea, concept) and social phenomenon (design as a social action) allows us to illustrate how the future (project) becomes a task of activity in the present. The project transfers or shifts (Simmel) the future time to space which is always ready for the perception of projections, and is also an opportunity to organize future joint actions. We will argue that when the project is executed, when it is no longer — there is no longer any future. The project thus ensures the future. Or, to achieve complete circularity, we will introduce a third element: without the future, a group or a “we” cannot possibly exist. In our text, we would like to unreservedly insist that the idea of a project, or perhaps a sketch of any future theory of the project (or concept), has already been provided at the beginning of the last century within an imaginary encounter between Henri Bergson and Georg Simmel.

Keywords:

project, time, future, Henri Bergson, concept

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References

1. Losoncz, M. (2017), Phenomenologies of Empty Intentionality. Filozofska istraživanja, vol. 37, is. 3, pp. 529–544.

2. Libera, A. de (1999), L’art des Généralités Théories de L’Abstraction, Aubier, Paris, 703 p.

3. Kojève, A. (2014), The Notion of Authority, Verso Books, London, 224 p.

4. Krueger, J. (2011), Extended cognition and the space of social interaction, Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 20, is. 3, pp. 643–657.

5. Simmel, G. (1995), Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1901–1908, Bd. 1, Simmel, G. Gesamtausgabe, vol. 7, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 382 p.

6. Simmel, G. (1992), Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung, in Simmel, G., Gesamtausgabe, vol. 11, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1051 p.

7. Kant, I. (1999), Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 785 p.

8. Bergson, H. (2016), Histoire de l’idée de temps. Cours au Collège de France 1902–1903, PUF, Paris, 408 p.

9. Bataille, G. (1973), L’expèrience intèrieure, in Bataille, G., Oevres complètes, vol. 5, Gallimard, Paris, pp. 7–181.

10. Enjalbert, C. (2017), “Entretien avec Tadao Ando”, Philosophie magazine, no. 114, pp. 39–43.

11. Derrida, J. (1962), “Introduction”, in Husserl, E., L’Origine de la Géométrie, PUF, Paris, pp. 3–173.

12. Levinas, E. (1930), Théorie de l’intuition dans la phénoménologie de Husserl, Vrin, Paris, 224 p.

Published

2020-03-31

How to Cite

Bojanić, P., & Cherepanova, E. S. (2020). Invention of the future in project-time. An imaginary “encounter” between Georg Simmel and Henri Bergson, and its significance for architecture. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 36(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.111