Human in the ideology of globalism

Authors

  • Mukhtar A. Tolegen Sarsen Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University, 34, ul. 30-i Gvardeiskoi divizii, Ust-Kamenogorsk, 070002, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Yelena G. Ryakova Sarsen Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University, 34, ul. 30-i Gvardeiskoi divizii, Ust-Kamenogorsk, 070002, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Yelena V. Savchuk Sarsen Amanzholov East Kazakhstan University, 34, ul. 30-i Gvardeiskoi divizii, Ust-Kamenogorsk, 070002, Republic of Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.313

Abstract

In this article the authors reveals the peculiarities of human understanding and vision for the future of mankind in the ideology of globalism took shape and gained considerable influence on the minds of the people in the second half of the 20th century — early 21st century. Platforms and specialized institutes are organized to develop ideas and mechanisms for their implementation by transnational business elites and representatives of other social groups adjacent to them. Their worldview, formed in the context of a society of alienation, inevitably becomes part of the ideology. Turning to the analysis of the ideology of globalism from the point of view of the relationship to human and the humanity seems promising for an adequate understanding of the essence of globalism and its role in the formation of modern public consciousness, as well as the contours of the future society. Considering globalism as a sociocultural phenomenon, the authors identify the foundations for the formation of the globalist worldview and its ideological sources that lie in the liberal intellectual tradition. The key intellectual moves in the rhetoric of globalists are an appeal to economism, humanism, and the need to correct the world order in the spirit of liberal values. The authors of the article identify key milestones in the formation of the globalist worldview associated with socio-cultural transformations and changes in the configuration of the world socio-political structure, which are reflected in ideological constructions and scientific research. In the course of understanding texts and programs written in the spirit of globalism, the analysis of ideologies and terms, the system of arguments familiar to globalists, is carried out through the prism of understanding the role and place assigned by them to a human.

Keywords:

human, ideology, globalism, globalization, public consciousness, postliberalism, economism, world order, humanism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

Гусева, Н.В. (2016), Диалектика и варианты понимания исторического процесса, Мир Большого Алтая, № 3 (2), с. 564–573.

Кастельс, М. (2000), Информационная эпоха: экономика, общество и культура, М.: Изд. дом Высш. шк. экономики.

Бек, У. (2001), Что такое глобализация? М.: Прогресс-Традиция.

Гвишиани, Д. (2004), Мосты в будущее, М.: Едиториал УРСС.

Peccei, A. (1969), The Chasm Ahead, New York: Macmillan.

Бжезинский, З. (1972), Между двух веков. Роль Америки в технотронной эре, М.: Прогресс.

Печчеи, А. (1985), Человеческие качества, М.: Прогресс.

King, A. and Schneider, B. (1991), The First Global Revolution, New York: Pantheon Books.

Robertson, R. (1992), Globalization: Social theory and global culture, London: SAGE Publications.

Waters, M. (1995), Globalization, London: Routledge.

Киссинджер, Г. (1997), Дипломатия, пер. с англ. Львов, В.В., М.: Ладомир.

Huxley, J. (1927), Religion without Revelation, London: E.Benn.

Huxley, J. (1957), In New Bottles for New Wine, London: Chatto & Windus.

Esfandiary, F.M. (1973), UpWingers: A Futurist Manifesto, New York: John Day Co.

Esfandiary, F.M. (1989), Are You a Transhuman? New York: Warner Books.

Bostrom, N. (2002), Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards. Journal of Evolution and Technology, vol. 9, March. URL: http://jetpress.org/volume9/risks.html (дата обращения: 13.01.2022).

Hughes, J. (2004), Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future, Boulder: Westview Press.

Yudkowsky, E. (2007), Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk. Forthcoming in Global Catastrophic Risks, eds Bostrom, N. and Cirkovic, M., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 308–345.

Рифкин, Дж. (2014), Третья промышленная революция: Как горизонтальные взаимодействия меняют энергетику, экономику и мир в целом, М.: Альпина нон-фикшн.

Шваб, К. (2016), Четвертая промышленная революция, пер. АНО ДПО «Корпоративный университет Сбербанка», М.: Эскмо.

Weizsaecker, E. von and Wijkman, A. (2018), Come On! Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet, New York: Springer.

Gray, J. (1995), Enlightenment’s Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age, London: Routledge.

Рорти, Р. (1996), Случайность, ирония и солидарность, М.: Русское феноменологическое общество.

Berlin, I. (2000), Two concepts of liberty, in: Berlin, I.,The proper study of mankind, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, рр. 191–242.

Бауман, 3. (2004), Глобализация. Последствия для человека и общества, М: Весь Мир.

Маркс, К. и Энгельс, Ф. (1988), Немецкая идеология, М.: Политиздат.


References

Guseva, N.V. (2016), Dialectics and options for understanding the historical process, Mir Bol’shogo Altaia, no. 3 (2), pp. 564–573. (In Russian)

Castells, M. (2000), The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Moscow: HSE Publishing House. (In Russian)

Beck, U. (2001), What Is Globalization? Moscow: Progress-Traditsiia Publ. (In Russian)

Gvishiani, D. (2004), The bridges to the future, Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ. (In Russian)

Peccei, A. (1969), The Chasm Ahead, New York: Macmillan.

Brzezinski, Z. (1972), Between the two centuries. America’s role in the Technotron age, Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russian)

Peccei, A. (1985), The Human Quality, Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russian)

King, A. and Schneider, B. (1991), The First Global Revolution, New York: Pantheon Books.

Robertson, R. (1992), Globalization: Social theory and global culture, London: SAGE Publications.

Waters, M. (1995), Globalization, London: Routledge.

Kissinger, H. (1997), Diplomacy, Moscow: Ladomir Publ. (In Russian)

Huxley, J. (1927), Religion without Revelation, London: E.Benn.

Huxley, J. (1957), In New Bottles for New Wine, London: Chatto & Windus.

Esfandiary, F.M. (1973), UpWingers: A Futurist Manifesto, New York: John Day Co.

Esfandiary, F.M. (1989), Are You a Transhuman? New York: Warner Books.

Bostrom, N. (2002), Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards, Journal of Evolution and Technology, vol. 9, March. Available at: http://jetpress.org/volume9/risks.html (accessed: 13.01.2022).

Hughes, J. (2004), Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future, eds Bostrom, N. and Cirkovic, M., Boulder: Westview Press.

Yudkowsky, E. (2007), Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk, in: Forthcoming in Global Catastrophic Risks, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 308–345.

Rifkin, J. (2014), The Third Industrial Revolution; How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World, Moscow: Al’pina non-fikshn Publ. (In Russian)

Schvab, K. (2016), The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Moscow: Eskmo Publ. (In Russian)

Weizsaecker, E. von and Wijkman, A. (2018), Come On! Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet, New York: Springer.

Gray, J. (1995), Enlightenment’s Wake: Politics and Culture at the Close of the Modern Age, London: Routledge.

Rorti, R. (1996), Contingency, Irony and Solidarity, Moscow: Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo Publ. (In Russian)

Berlin, I. (2000), Two concepts of liberty, in: Berlin, I., The proper study of mankind, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, pp. 191–242.

Bauman, Z. (2004), Globalization: The Human Consequences, Moscow: Ves’ Mir Publ. (In Russian)

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1988), The German Ideology, Moscow: Politizdat Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2022-10-20

How to Cite

Tolegen, M. A., Ryakova, Y. G., & Savchuk, Y. V. (2022). Human in the ideology of globalism. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 38(3), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.313