Perverse heroism. Vyacheslav Ivanov’s dialogue with Nietzsche

Authors

  • Marta Lechowska Jagiellonian Universtiy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.204

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to analyse the theoretical base of tragic culture in the writings of F. Nietzsche and V. I. Ivanov. The result of the proposed analysis is the comparison of similarities and differences concerning the cultural role of tragedy in the philosophy of mentioned authors. The philosophers — Nietzsche, the implacable enemy of the historical Christianity and Ivanov, the Christian philosopher of culture, philologist and translator — both postulate creating and preserving tragic culture. According to both authors, the main task of culture is to confront the human being with the most terrible aspects of life. This ruthless requirement allows us to claim that perverse heroism is a general mood and the most important imperative of Nietzsche’s and Ivanov’s philosophy of culture. The imperative to preserve the tragic
principle in culture is in fact an imperative to become a superhuman. The starting point of the analysis is the theorem of Nietzsche who defines a tragic worldview as the opposite of a theoretical one. The essence of the theoretical approach is an overlooking of the tragic dimension of life, which allows man to establish a coherent, justified and safe picture of the world. The tragic approach, emphasizing the inevitability of suffering and the lack of metaphysical foundation, opposes the optimism of the theoretical one. Ivanov, as Nietzsche, was fascinated with Dionysian idea but he interpreted it quite differently. The Russian author accepted Dionysus not as the opposite, but as a prefiguration of Christ. Thus, he drew attention to the presence of the tragic moment in Christianity. The height of Ivanov’s dispute with Nietzsche is a completely different interpretation of the idea of superhuman, which presents a totally different understanding of self-transgression and vastly different value systems.

Keywords:

tragic culture, Christianity, philosophical anthropology, superhuman, godmanhood

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References

1. Van Gennep, A. (1960), The rites of passage, transl. from fr. by Vizedom, M. B. and Caffee, G. L., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

2. Fredericksen, D. and Hendrykowski, M. (2007), Canal, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza Publ.

3. Nietzsche, F. (1956a), The Birth of Tragedy and The Genealogy of Morals, transl. from ger. by Golffing, F., New York: Doubleday & Company.

4. Nietzsche, F. (2009), Wola mocy, transl. by Drzewiecki, K. and Frycz, S., Kraków: vis-à-vis etiuda.

5. Baran, B. (1994), Metaphysics of tragedy, in Nietzsche, F., Narodziny tragedii albo Grecy i pesymizm, transl. by Baran, B., Kraków: inter esse, pp. 7–13.

6. Nietzsche, F. (1956b), A critical backward glance, in Nietzsche, F., The birth of tragedy and the Genealogy of morals, transl. by Golffing, F., New York: Doubleday & Company, pp. 3–17.

7. Eliade, M. (1966), A history of religious ideas, transl. by Wierusz-Kowalski, J., Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza.

8. Wodziński, C. (1987), Lev Shestov, in Dostojewski i Nietzsche. Filozofia tragedii, transl. by Wodziński, C., Warszawa: Czytelnik, pp. 5–27.

9. Stammler, H. (1986), Vyacheslav Ivanov and Nietzsche, in Jackson, R. L. and Nelson, L. (eds), Vyacheslav Ivanov: Poet, Critic and Philosopher, New Haven: Yale Center for International and Area Studies, pp. 297–312.

10. Braginskaja, N. W. (1988), The tragedy and ritual of Vyacheslav Ivanov, in Meletinskij, E. M. (ed.), Arkhaicheskii ritual v fol’klornykh i ranneliteraturnykh pamiatnikakh, Nauka Publ., Моscow, pp. 366–399. (In Russian)

11. Ivanov, V. (1974), About the essence of the tragedy, in Ivanov, V., Sobranie sochinenii, eds Ivanov, D. V. and Deschartes, O., vol. 2, Brussel: Foyer Oriental Chrétien, pp. 190–202. (In Russian)

12. Ivanov, V. (1974), About an act and action, in Ivanov, V., Sobranie sochinenii, eds Ivanov, D. V. and Deschartes, O., vol. 2, Brussel: Foyer Oriental Chrétien, pp. 156–169. (In Russian)

13. Ivanov, V. (1987), Dostoevsky. Tragedy — myth — mysticism, in Ivanov, V., Sobranie sochinenii, eds Ivanov, D. V. and Deschartes, O., vol. 4, Brussel: Foyer Oriental Chrétien, pp. 483–586. (In Russian)

14. Ivanov, V. (1974), Two elements in contemporary symbolism, in Ivanov, V., Sobranie sochinenii, eds Ivanov, D. V. and Deschartes, O., vol. 2, Brussel: Foyer Oriental Chrétien, pp. 536–561. (In Russian)

15. Ivanov, V. (1987), The aesthetic principle of theatre, in Ivanov, V., Sobranie sochinenii, eds Ivanov, D. V. and Deschartes, O., vol. 4, Brussel: Foyer Oriental Chrétien, pp. 205–214. (In Russian)

16. Ivanov, V., Hellenic religion of a suffering god. Available at: http://www.rvb.ru/ivanov/1_critical/2_eshill/01text/02add/08.htm (accessed: 06.08. 2019). (In Russian)

17. Deschartes, O. (1971), Introduction, in Ivanov, V., Sobranie sochinenii, eds Ivanov, D. V. and Deschartes, O., vol. 1, Brussel: Foyer Oriental Chrétien, pp. 7–227. (In Russian)

18. Naldoniova, L. (2001), Dostoevsky and Nietzsche: The Anthropological Consciousness of the Creative Man, Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita. (Studia Slavica, XV).

19. Ivanov, V. (1974), New mask, in Ivanov, V., Sobranie sochinenii, eds Ivanov, D. V. and Deschartes, O., vol. 2, Brussel: Foyer Oriental Chrétien, pp. 76–82. (In Russian)

20. Ivanov, V. (1974), Anima, in Ivanov, V., Sobranie sochinenii, eds Ivanov, D. V. and Deschartes, O., vol. 2, Brussel: Foyer Oriental Chrétien, pp. 269–293. (In Russian)

21. Ivanov, V. (1979), Sporades, in Ivanov, V., Sobranie sochinenii, eds Ivanov, D. V. and Deschartes, O., vol. 3, Brussel: Foyer Oriental Chrétien, pp. 111–135. (In Russian)

22. Förster-Nietzsche, E., (1954), Introduction, in The philosophy of Nietzsche, New York: The Modern Library, pp. 9–33.

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Lechowska, M. (2020). Perverse heroism. Vyacheslav Ivanov’s dialogue with Nietzsche. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 36(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.204