Philosophical and pedagogic views of N. M. Karamzin

Authors

  • Lev E. Shaposhnikov Kozma Minin Nizhniy Novgorod State Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.208

Abstract

The paper analyses the evolution of N. M. Karamzin’s ideas from the position of moderate westernism and liberalism to organic conservatism. Special attention is given to Karamzin’s understanding of the philosophy of history, where the main emphasis was made on the splendor of monarchical Russia. N. M.Karamzin was critical about the early liberal reforms of Alexander I and proposed the introduction of a “sound” state system, based on national values and exercising caution to the new developments. The paper also analyses Karamzin’s conceptualization of the dynamics of the historical process. It is noted that he assign special importance to autocracy in the harmonious development of Russia, it is precisely the monarch who needs to create conditions for increasing the efficiency of the state apparatus. The monarch’s policy must, by the inevitability of punishment, compel officials (of high and lower ranks) to comply with the laws. A significant role in society should also belong to the Church, which, according to N. Karamzin, needs to be given more attention. Overall, the scholar sees the secret to the prosperity of Russia In the synergy of strong state leadership, government apparatus, and priests. The pedagogical views of Karamzin are another focus of the present work, as well as his understanding of national education and the interplay of the universal and nationally specific features in it. Opposing isolationism, the scholar, nevertheless, advanced the idea that Russia needs to have its own way in development by means of improving the educational system, introducing the continuity of its stages, and enhancing the quality of preparing teachers. The paper arrives at a conclusion about the relevance of N. Karamzin’s ideas for modern Russian society.

Keywords:

liberalism, conservatism, education, reforms, revolution, Europe, Russia, monarchy, Orthodox Christianity

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

1. Розанов, В. В.(2008), Собр. соч., в 30 т., т. 23., М.; СПб.: Республика, Росток.

2. Карамзин, Н. М. (2010), Избранные труды, М.: РОССПЭН.

3. Катков, М. Н. (2010), Собр. соч., в 6 т., т. 1, СПб.: Росток.

4. Карамзин, Н. М.(1802), О новых благородных училищах, заводимых в России, Вестник Европы, № 8, с. 358–366.

5. Корф, М. А.(1861), Жизнь графа М. М. Сперанского, т. 2., СПб.: Издание императорской публичной библиотеки.

6. Карамзин: pro et contra (2006), СПб.: Изд-во РХГА.

7. Розанов В. В. (2008), Собр. соч., в 30 т., т. 24., М.; СПб.: Республика, Росток.

8. Карамзин, Н. М. (1989), История государства Российского, в 12 т., т. 1., М.: Наука.

9. Аксаков, К. С. (1995), Эстетика и литературная критика, М.: Искусство.

References

1. Rosanov, V. V. (2008), Collected works, in 30 vols., vol. 23, Moscow and St. Petersburg: Respublika Publ., Rostok Publ. (In Russian)

2. Karamzin, N. M. (2010), Selected works, Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russian)

3. Katkov, M. N. (2010), Collected works, in 6 vols., vol. 1, St. Petersburg: Rostok Publ. (In Russian)

4. Karamzin, N. M. (1802), On the new noble schools being established in Russia, Vestnik Evropy, no. 8, pp. 358–366.

5. Korf, M. A. (1861), Life of count M. M. Speransky, vol. 2, St. Petersburg: Izdanie Imperatorskoi publichnoi biblioteki Publ. (In Russian)

6. Karamzin: pro et contra(2006), St. Petersburg: RHGA Publ. (In Russian)

7. Rosanov, V. V. (2008), Collected works, in 30 vols., vol. 24, Moscow and St. Petersburg: Respublika Publ., Rostok Publ. (In Russian)

8. Karamzin, N. M. (1989), History of the Russian state, in 12 vols., vol. 1, Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian)

9. Aksakov, K. S. (1995), Aesthetics and literary criticism, Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Shaposhnikov, L. E. (2020). Philosophical and pedagogic views of N. M. Karamzin. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 36(2), 300–312. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.208