Why are myths true: Plato on the veracity of myths

Authors

  • Irina Deretic University of Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.302

Abstract

Distinguishing myths in terms of their veracity had almost been neglected in Plato’s studies. In this article, the author focuses on Plato’s controversial claims about the truth-status of myths. An attempt is made to elucidate what he really had in mind when assessing the veracity of myths. The author claims that Plato, while discussing the epistemic status of myths, actually distinguished three kinds of myths in regard to what they narrate. Additionally, it is argued that he endorses three different kinds of truth value for myths: they can be either true or false, probable, or factually false but conveying some valuable truths. In the Republic II and III, Plato implicitly distinguishes the truth value of theological myths from the truth value of aetiological and normative ones, each of which are explained in detail in the article. In Plato’s view, the theological myths can be either true or false, because he determines the divine nature a priori. When ascribing the probable character to myths, Plato has in mind mostly aetiological myths. Given that we are unable to establish the truths on the origins and development of many phenomena, because they originated in the remote past, what we can do is to reconstruct plausible and consistent myths of these phenomena, which, among others, might contain the arguments and even proofs, such as the proof of the cosmic destruction in Plato’s own myth in the Politicus. In the third case, when Plato says that myths are lies, yet containing some truth, he had in mind myths which might be the product of our imagination like eschatological myths, for example. Being a kind of fiction, they are false, in the sense they do not correspond to any real state of affairs. Since they convey profound ethical norms or religious insights, they can be regarded as true.

 

Keywords:

Plato, myth, veracity, truth, falsehood, the Republic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

References

1. Plato (1997), Republic, in Cooper, J. M. (ed.), Plato, Complete works, Indianapolis: Ind, Hackett Pub, pp. 971–1223.

2. Gadamer, H. G. (1984), Platon und Dichter, in Gadamer, H. G., Gesammelte Werke, ed. by Mohr, J. C. B., vol. 5, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 249–262.

3. Annas, J. (1982), Plato on the Triviality of Literature, in Moravcsik, J. M. E. and Temko, P. (eds), Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts, Totowa, N. J.: Rowman and Littlefield.

4. Ferrari, G. R. F. (1990), Plato and Poetry, in Kennedy, G. A. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 92–148.

5. Asmis, E. (1992), Plato on poetic creativity, in Kraut, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 338–364.

6. Gould, T. (1990), Ancient quarrel between philosophy and poetry, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

7. Levin, H. (1959), Some Meanings of Myth, Daedalus, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 223–231.

8. Moss, J. (1992), What is imitative poetry and why is it bad?, in Ferrari, G. R. F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 415–444.

9. Cooper, J. M. and Hutchinson, D. S. (eds) (1997), Plato, Complete works, Indianapolis: Ind, Hackett Pub.

10. Brisson, L. (2004), How Philosophers Saved Myths: Allegorical Interpretation and Classical Mythology, Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

11. Battin, M. P. (1977), Plato on True and False Poetry, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 163–174.

12. Deretic, I. (2014), Platonova filozofska mitologija, Belgrade: Zavod za udžbenike.

13. Platon (1990), Werke in 8 Bänden (griechisch-deutsch), Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

14. Svetlov, R. V. (2014), Myth from the dialogue “statesman” and the first “battle for history”, Vestnik Russkoi Khristianskoi Gumanitarnoi Akademii, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 33–39. (In Russian)

15. Smith, N. D. (2019), Summoning Knowledge in Plato’s Republic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

16. Plato (1997), Laws, in Cooper, J. M. (ed.), Plato, Complete works, Indianapolis: Ind, Hackett Pub, pp. 1318–1616.

17. Plato (1997), Timaeus, in Cooper, J. M. (ed.), Plato, Complete works, Indianapolis: Ind, Hackett Pub, pp. 1224–1291.

18. Burnyeat, M. F. (2009), Eikos Muthos, in Partenie, C. (ed.), Plato’s Myths, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–186.

19. Plato (1997), Phaedo, in Cooper, J. M. (ed.), Plato, Complete works, Indianapolis: Ind, Hackett Pub, pp. 49–100.

20. Gill, C. (1993), Plato on Falsehood — not Fiction, in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, pp. 38–87.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

Deretic, I. (2020). Why are myths true: Plato on the veracity of myths. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 36(3), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.302

Issue

Vol. 36 No. 3 (2020): Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies

Section

Philosophy

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.