At the origins of the Leningrad philosophy of culture. Elmar V. Sokolov. The justification of morality in philosophical practice

Authors

  • Goulnara R. Khaydarova The N. G. Kuznetsov Naval Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.307

Abstract

The article retrospectively analyzes the stage of the origin of philosophy of culture as a discipline in Leningrad at the end of the 20 th century on the example of the prominent professor Elmar Sokolov, who brought a community of interested philosophers together. The problem of spirituality substantiation through involvement in the philosophical culture can be called a key and consolidating effort of thinkers with different political orientations. At the same time, a characteristic feature of the era was the idea of the unity of a philosophical culture that does not scatter into a multitude of diverse practices. At the opposite pole from official Marxism the dividing line passed between the religious type of spirituality and the secular cultural practice of philosophy, and, accordingly, between religious morality and “moral culture” as individual free aspiration. The concept of “moral culture” in various interpretations was developed by Professor Sokolov. The basis of morality for him is freedom, and the value is a productive “freedom for”, which implies the participation of the individual in the whole (family, society, and culture). Philosophical “self-care” leads to the desire for fullness of spiritual life, and freedom is supplemented by the “dictatorship of conscience”, which is not given rationally, logically, or socially, but is rooted in the love of goodness.

Keywords:

philosophy of culture, moral culture, individual freedom, reflection, consciousness, benevolence

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Литература

1. Каган, М. С., Перов, Ю. В., Прозерский, В. В. и Юровская Э. П. (ред.) (1995), Философия культуры: становление и развитие: учеб. пособие, СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та.

2. Соколов, Э. В. (2003), В миру и наедине с собой. URL: http://samlib.ru/s/sokolow_e_w/memory.shtml#_Toc42652489 (дата обращения: 13.07.2020).

3. Юнгер, Э. (2013), Эвмесвиль, М.: Ad Marginem.

4. Соколов, Э. В. (1990), Нравственная культура как условие формирования здорового общества, в Солонин, Ю. Н. (сост.), Какая философия нам нужна? Размышления о философии и духовных проблемах нашего общества, Л.: Лениздат, с. 123–151.

5. Исаков, А. Н. (2019), Метафизика марксизма, ESSE. Философские и теологические исследования, т. 4, № 1. URL: https://esse-journal.ru/?p=5710 (дата обращения: 13.07.2020).

6. Гегель, Г. В. Ф. (1977), Энциклопедия философских наук, М.: Мысль.

7. Артановский, С. Н. (2015), «Я никогда не говорил того, во что не верил. Но иногда мне приходилось молчать». Э. В. Соколов как человек и ученый, в Марков, Б. В. и Малинов, А. В. (сост.), Вспоминая философский факультет, СПб.: Санкт-Петербургское философское общество, с. 185–201.

8. Казин, А. Л. (2015), Александровский парк (главы из книги), в Марков, Б. В. и Малинов, А. В. (сост.), Вспоминая философский факультет, СПб.: Санкт-Петербургское философское общество, с. 119–172.

9. Солонин, Ю. Н. (1990), От составителя, в Солонин, Ю. Н. (сост.), Какая философия нам нужна? Размышления о философии и духовных проблемах нашего общества, Л.: Лениздат, с. 3–6.

10. Дильтей, В. (2001), Сущность философии, М.: Интрада.

11. Беньямин, В. (2019), Девять работ, М.: РИПОЛ-классик, Панглосс.

References

1. Kagan, M. S., Perov, Yu. V., Prozerskii, V. V. and Yurovskaia, E. P. (eds) (1995), Philosophy of culture: formation and development. Textbook, St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press. (In Russian)

2. Sokolov, E. V. (2003), In the world and alone. Available at: http://samlib.ru/s/sokolow_e_w/memory.shtml#_Toc42652489 (accessed: 13.07.2020). (In Russian)

3. Jünger, E. (2013), Eumeswil, Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ. (In Russian)

4. Sokolov, E. V. (1990), Moral culture as a condition for forming a healthy society, in Solonin, Yu. N. (ed.), What philosophy do we need? Reflections on the philosophy and spiritual problems of our society, Leningrad: Lenizdat Publ., pp. 123–151. (In Russian)

5. Isakov, A. N. (2019), Metaphysics of Marxism, ESSE. Filosofskie i teologicheskie issledovaniia, vol. 4, no. 1. Available at: https://esse-journal.ru/?p=5710 (accessed: 13.07.2020). (In Russian)

6. Hegel, G. V. F. (1977), Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften, Moscow: Mysl’ Publ. (In Russian)

7. Artanovskij, S. N. (2015), “I never said anything I didn’t believe in. But sometimes I had to be silent”. E. V. Sokolov as a person and a scientist, in Markov, B. V. and Malinov, A. V. (eds), Remembering philosophy department, St. Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo Publ., pp. 185–201. (In Russian)

8. Kazin, A. L. (2015), Alexander Park (chapters from the book), in Markov, B. V. and Malinov, A. V. (eds), Remembering philosophy department, St. Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo Publ., pp. 119–172. (In Russian)

9. Solonin, Yu. N. (1990), From the editor, in Solonin Yu. N. (ed.), What philosophy do we need? Reflections on the philosophy and spiritual problems of our society, Leningrad: Lenizdat Publ., pp. 3–6. (In Russian)

10. Dilthey, W. (2001), Das Wesen der Philosophie, Moscow: Intrada Publ. (In Russian)

11. Benjamin, W. (2019), Nine works, Moscow: RIPOL klassik Publ., Pangloss Publ. (In Russian)

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

Khaydarova, G. R. (2020). At the origins of the Leningrad philosophy of culture. Elmar V. Sokolov. The justification of morality in philosophical practice. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 36(3), 497–510. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2020.307